Skip to main content
Log in

Does the intraoperative peritoneal lavage cytology add prognostic information in patients with potentially curative gastric resection?

  • 2005 SSAT Annual Meeting
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Peritoneal recurrence is the foremost pattern of failure after potentially curative resection for gastric cancer. Our aim was to evaluate the prognostic value of intraperitoneal free cancer cells (IFCCs) in peritoneal lavage of patients who underwent potentially curative resection for gastric carcinoma. Two hundred twenty patients with gastric cancer stage I, II, or III were prospectively evaluated with peritoneal lavage and cytologic examination. Aspirated fluid from the abdominal cavity was centrifuged and subjected to Papanicolaou staining. The mean age was 60.9 years (range, 21–89 years), and 63.6% were men. IFCCs were detected in 6.8% of the patients; suspicious in 2.7%, and negative in 84.5%. No judgment could be given in 5.9% of the cases. Invasion of the gastric serosa (pT3) was observed in all positive cytology patients. Patients with IFCCs had a mean survival time of 10.5 months, while those with negative IFCC had a mean survival time of 61 months (P = 0.00001). There was no correlation between the presence of IFCCs and tumor size, histology, pN, or tumor site. Our conclusions are that (1) positive cytology indicates a poor prognosis in patients who underwent potentially curative gastric resection and (2) peritoneal lavage cytology improves staging in assessing these patients and may alter their therapeutic approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Parkin DM, Pisani P, Ferlay J. Statistics are given for global patterns of cancer incidence and mortality for males and females in 23 regions of the world. CA Cancer J Clin 1999;49:33–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Howson CP, Hiyama T, Wynder EL. The decline in gastric cancer: epidemiology of an unplanned triumph. Epidemiol Rev 1986;8:1–27.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Allum WH, Powell DJ, McConkey CC, Fielding JWL. Gastric cancer: a 25 year review. Br J Surg 1989;76:536–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Koga S, Kishimoto H, Tanaka K, Kawaguchi H. Clinical and pathologic evaluation of patients with recurrence of gastric cancer more than five years postoperatively. Am J Surg 1978;136:317–321.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jaehne J, Meyer HJ, Soudah B, et al. Peritoneal lavage in gastric carcinoma. Dig Surg 1989;6:26–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nakajima T, Harashima S, Hirata M, Kajitani T. Prognostic and therapeutic values of peritoneal cytology in gastric cancer. Acta Cytol 1978;22:225–229.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Iitsuka Y, Kaneshima S, Tanida O, et al. Intraperitoneal free cancer cells and their viability in gastric cancer. Cancer 1979; 44:1476–1480.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Koga S, Kaibara N, Iitsuka Y, et al. Prognostic significance of intraperitoneal free cancer cells in gastric cancer patients. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 1984;108:236–238.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaibara N, Iitsuka Y, Kimura A, et al. Relationship between area of serosal invasion and prognostic in patients with gastric carcinoma. Cancer 1987;60:136–139.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Iitsuka Y, Shiota S, Matsui T, et al. Relationship between the cytologic characteristics of intraperitoneal free cancer cells and the prognosis in patients with gastric cancer. Acta Cytol 1990;34:437–442.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ribeiro U Jr, Gama-Rodrigues J, Bitelman B, et al. Value of peritoneal lavage cytology during laparoscopic staging of patients with gastric carcinomas. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1998; 8:132–135.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ribeiro U Jr, Gama-Rodrigues JJ, Safatle-Ribeiro AV, et al. Prognostic significance of intraperitoneal free cancer cells obtained by laparoscopic peritoneal lavage in patients with gastric cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 1998;2:244–249.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Burke EC, Karpeh MS Jr, Conlon KC, Brennan MF. Peritoneal lavage cytology in gastric cancer: an independent predictor of outcome. Ann Surg Oncol 1998;5:411–415.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bonenkamp JJ, Songun I, Hermans J, et al. Prognostic value of positive cytology findings from abdominal washings in patients with gastric cancer. Br J Surg 1996;83:672–674.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bentrem D, Wilton A, Mazumdar M, et al. The value of peritoneal cytology as a preoperative predictor in patients with gastric carcinoma undergoing a curative resection. Ann Surg Oncol 2005;12:347–353.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Elaraj D, Ettinghausen SE. Cytological analysis of peritoneal washings: now part of the standard preoperative staging evaluation for patients with respectable gastric cancer? Ann Surg Oncol 2005;12:339–341.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Oliveira DR, Ribeiro U Jr, Bitelman B, et al. Gastric malignancy: preoperative staging by laparoscopy. Rev Hosp Clín Fac Med São Paulo 1993;48:4–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bando E, Yonemura Y, Takeshita Y, et al. Intraoperative lavage for cytological examination in 1,297 patients with gastric carcinoma. Am J Surg 1999;178:256–262.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Suzuki T, Ochiai T, Hayashi H, et al. Importance of positive peritoneal lavage cytology findings in the stage grouping of gastric cancer. Surg Today 1999;29:111–115.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kodera Y, Yamamura Y, Shimizu Y, et al. Peritoneal washing cytology: prognostic value of positive findings in patients with gastric carcinoma undergoing a potentially curative resection. J Surg Oncol 1999;72:60–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Runyon BA, Hoefs JC, Morgan TR. Ascitic fluid analysis in malignancy-related ascites. Hepatology 1988;8:1104–1109.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Benevolo M, Mottolese M, Cosimelli M, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic value of peritoneal immunocytology in gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16:3406–3411.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kodera Y, Nakanishi H, Ito S, et al. Quantitative detection of disseminated free cancer cells in peritoneal washes with real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction: a sensitive predictor of outcome for patients with gastric carcinoma. Ann Surg 2002;235:499–506.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Markman M. Melphalan and cytarabine administered intraperitoneally as single agents and combination intraperitoneal chemotherapy with cisplatin and cytarabine. Semin Oncol 1985;12:33–37.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Funami Y, Tokumoto N, Miyauchi H, et al. Prognostic value of peritoneal lavage cytology and chemotherapy during surgery for advanced gastric cancer. Int Surg 1999;84:220–224.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Fujimoto S, Takahashi M, Mutou T, et al. Successful intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemoperfusion for the prevention of postoperative peritoneal recurrence in patients with advanced gastric carcinoma. Cancer 1999;85:529–534.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ulysses Ribeiro Jr. M.D..

Additional information

Supported by a travel grant from the Foundation of Support to the Research of the State of São Paulo (FAPESP) Foundation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ribeiro, U., Safatle-Ribeiro, A.V., Zilberstein, B. et al. Does the intraoperative peritoneal lavage cytology add prognostic information in patients with potentially curative gastric resection?. J Gastrointest Surg 10, 170–177 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2005.11.001

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2005.11.001

Key words

Navigation