Skip to main content
Log in

Gastroesophageal and pharyngeal reflux detection using impedance and 24-hour pH monitoring in asymptomatic subjects: Defining the normal environment

  • 2004 SSAT Annual Meeting
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Airway symptoms are often caused by aspiration of refluxed materials into the larynx. In this study we sought to define the frequency, character, and proximal extent of refluxed contents — including nonacid reflux—in normal subjects using intraluminal impedance to improve our understanding of the relationship between reflux and aspiration. Ten subjects, who had no symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease or airway disease, underwent impedance/pH monitoring with a catheter that allowed simultaneous esophageal and pharyngeal monitoring. Impedance detected 496 gastroesophageal reflux episodes in the 10 subjects during 240 hours of study. The majority, 399 (81% of the total) were acid reflux episodes (pH<4). Ninety-seven were nonacid (pH>4).Most reflux episodes (348 of 496) reached the mid esophagus (9 cm above lower esophageal sphincter). There were 51 reflux episodes that reached the pharynx (PR). Only 13 (25%) of PR were acidic (pH < 4), while 38 were nonacid. Twenty-six PR episodes were liquid and 25 were mixed (liquid and gas). The median number of PR episodes measured with impedance was 5 (0-10). In asymptomatic subjects, most episodes of gastroesophageal reflux are acidic and reach the midesophagus. Reflux into the PR appears to be more common than previously believed, and most of these episodes are not acidic. Thus, traditional 24-hour pH monitoring may underestimate the presence of pharyngeal reflux. The combination of impedance with pH monitoring markedly enhances our ability to accurately detect potential microaspiration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Girelli CM, Cuvello P, Limido E, Rocca F. Duodenogastric reflux: an update. Am J Gastroenterol 1996;91:648–653.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Velasco N, Pope CE, Gannan RM, et al. Measurement of esophageal reflux by scintigraphy. Dig Dis Sci 1984;29:977–982.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sifrim D, Holloway R, Silny J, et al. Acid, nonacid and gas reflux in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease during ambulatory 24-hour pH-impedance recordings. Gastroenterology 2001;120:1588–1598.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Stein HJ, Kauer WKH, Feussner H, et al. Bile acids as components of duodenogastric refluxate: detection, relationship to bilirubin, mechanism of injury, and clinical relevance. Hepatogastroenterology 1999;46:66–73.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kauer WK, Peters JH, DeMeester TR, et al. Mixed reflux of gastric and duodenal juices is more harmful to the esophagus than gastric juice alone. The need for surgical therapy reemphasized. Ann Surg 1995;222:525–531.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rosen R, Nurko S. The importance of multichannel intraluminal impedance in the evaluation of children with persistent respiratory symptoms. Am J Gastroenterol 2004;99:2452–2458.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sifrim D, Silny J, Holloway RH, Janssens JJ. Patterns of gas and liquid reflux during transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation: a study using intraluminal electrical impedance. Gut 1999;44:47–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Shay S, Tutuian R, Sifrim D, et al. Twenty-four hour ambulatory simultaneous impedance and pH monitoring: a multicenter report of normal values from 60 healthy volunteers. Am J Gastroenterol 2004;99:1037–1043.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sifrim D, Holloway R, Silny J, et al. Composition of the postprandial refluxate in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:647–655.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Castell DO, Vela M. Combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH-metry: an evolving technique to measure type and proximal extent of gastroesophageal reflux. Am J Med 2001;111:157S-159S. (Suppl 8A).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shay SS, Bomeli S, Ritcher J. Multichannel intraluminal impedance accurately detects fasting recumbent reflux events and their clearning. Am J Physiol (Gastrointest Liver Physiol) 2002;283:G376-G383.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Balaji NS, Blom D, DeMeester TR, Peters JH. Redefining gastroesophageal reflux (GER). Surg Endosc 2003;17:1380–1385.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Embanks TR, Omelanczuk PE, Maronian N, et al. Pharyngeal pH monitoring in 222 patients with suspected laryngeal reflux. J GASTROINTEST SURG 2001;5:183–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. DiBaise JK, Lof J, Quigley EM. Can symptoms predict esophageal motor function or acid exposure in gastroesphageal reflux disease? A comparison of esophageal manometric and twenty-four-hour pH parameters in typical and extraesophageal gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Clin Gastroenterol 2001;32:128–132.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Shaker R, Milbrath M, Ren J, et al. Esophagopharyngeal distribution of refluxed gastric acid in patients with reflux laryngitis. Gastroenterology 1995;109:1575–1582.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Patti MG, Debas HT, Pellegrini CA. Clinical and functional characterization of high gastroesophageal reflux. Am J Surg 1993;165:163–166.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Patti MG, Arcerito M, Tamburini A, et al. Effect of laparoscopic fundoplication on gastroesophageal reflux diseaseinduced respiratory symptoms. J GASTROINTEST SURG 2000; 4:143–149.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pelligrini CA, DeMeester TR, Johnson LF, Skinner DB. Gastroesophageal reflux and pulmonary aspiration: incidence, functional abnormality, and results of surgical therapy. Surgery 1979;86:110–119.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kauer WK, Stein HJ, Mobius C, Siewert JR. Assessment of respiratory symptoms with dual pH monitoring in patients with gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Br J Surg 2004;91:867–871.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Oelschlager BK, Enbanks TR, Oleyaikov D, et al. Symptomatic and physiologic outcomes after operative treatment for extraesophageal reflux. Surg Endosc 2002;16:1032–1036. Epub 2002 May 03.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Vela MF, Camacho-Lobato L, Srinivasan R, et al. Simultaneous intraesophageal impedance and pH measurement of acid and nonacid gastroesophageal reflux: effect of omeprazole. Gastroenterology 2001;120:1599–1606.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brant K. Oelschlager M.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oelschlager, B.K., Quiroga, E., Isch, J.A. et al. Gastroesophageal and pharyngeal reflux detection using impedance and 24-hour pH monitoring in asymptomatic subjects: Defining the normal environment. J Gastrointest Surg 10, 54–62 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2005.09.005

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2005.09.005

Key words

Navigation