Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mapping the rectum: Spatial analysis of transanal endoscopic microsurgical outcomes using GIS technology

  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is a technically challenging procedure hindered by rectal anatomic constraints. To study the relationship of lesion position with performance of TEM, a novel approach of spatial analysis using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) was developed. A retrospective review was conducted on 144 consecutive TEMs, analyzing clinical, pathologic, and positional characteristics. Two- and three-dimensional maps of rectal topology were developed. GIS was used for spatial analysis, accounting for regional position and clustering of lesions. Lesions were located at a mean distance of 9.3 ± 4.9 (SD) cm from the dentate line, with an average size of 3.1 ± 1.4 cm. Proximal regions were associated with prolonged operative time. Regions between the rectosigmoid junction and the peritoneal reflection were associated with peritoneal breach. In spatial regression analysis, regional characteristics that were significantly associated with operative time included distance, presence of cancers, and positive margins; peritoneal breach was significantly associated with lesion size and location; conversions were associated with distance (P < 0.05). Specific knowledge of lesion size and location in the context of anatomic relationships is important for optimizing operative intervention. GIS provides a valuable tool in organizing spatial information and can be extended into clinical research topics involving the distinction of anatomic relationships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Saclarides TJ. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Surg Clin North Am 1997;77:229–239.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mayer J, Mortensen NJ. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: a forgotten minimally invasive operation. Br J Surg 1995;82:435–437.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Boulos MNK. Towards evidence-based, GIS-driven national spatial health information infrastructure and surveillance services in the United Kingdom. Int J Health Geogr 2004;3:1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ganai S, Kanumuri P, Rao RS, Alexander AI. Local recurrence following transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal polyps and early cancers. Ann Surg Oncol 2006. In press.

  5. Schoen RE, Gerber LD, Margulies C. The pathologic measurement of polyp size is preferable to the endoscopic estimate. Gastrointest Endosc 1997;46:492–496.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Buess G, Mentges B, Manncke K, et al. Technique and results of transanal endoscopic microsurgery in early rectal cancer. Am J Surg 1992;163:63–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Buess GF, Raestrup H. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Surg Oncol Clin North Am 2001;10:709–731.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Nivatvongs S, Stern HS, Fryd DS. The length of the anal canal. Dis Colon Rect 1981;24:600–601.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Madigan MR, Halls JM. The extent of sigmoidoscopy shown on radiographs with special reference to the rectosigmoid junction. Gut 1968;9:355–362.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jorge JMN, Wexner SD. Anatomy and physiology of the rectum and anus. Eur J Surg 1997;163:723–731.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mahmoud N, Rombeau J, Ross HM, Fry RD. Colon and rectum. In: Townsend Jr CM, ed. Sabiston Textbook of Surgery, 17th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders, 2004, 1401–1404.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kodner IJ, Fry RD, Fleshman JW, et al. Colon, rectum, and anus. In: Schwartz SI, ed. Principles of Surgery, 7th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1999, pp 1265–1271.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ebdon D. Statistics in Geography, 2nd ed. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bailey TC, Gatrell AC. Interactive Spatial Data Analysis. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Parks AG, Stuart AE. The management of villous tumours of the large bowel. Br J Surg 1973;60:688–695.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sutherland F, Harris J. Claude Couinaud: a passion for the liver. Arch Surg 2002;137:1305–1310.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mentges B, Buess G, Schäfer D, et al. Local therapy of rectal tumors. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:886–892.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mentges B, Buess G, Effinder G, et al. Indications and results of local treatment of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1997;84:348–351.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Neary P, Makin GB, White TJ, et al. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: a viable operative alternative in selected patients with rectal lesions. Ann Surg Oncol 2003;10:1106–1111.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Langer C, Liersch T, Suss M, et al. Surgical cure for early rectal carcinoma and large adenoma: transanal endoscopic microsurgery (using ultrasound or electrosurgery) compared to conventional local and radical resection. Int J Colorectal Dis 2003;18:222–229.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sailer M, Leppert R, Bussen D, et al. Influence of tumor position on accuracy of endorectal ultrasound staging. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40:1180–1186.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Roth NM, Kiani MF. A ’’geographic information systems’’ based technique for the study of microvascular networks. Ann Biomed Eng 1999;27:42–47.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bartling WC, Schleyer TK. An application of Geospatial Information System (GIS) technology to anatomic dental charting. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2003;786.

  24. Gavagan JA, Whiteford MH, Swanstrom LL. Full-thickness intraperitoneal excision by transanal endoscopic microsurgery does not increase short-term complications. Am J Surg 2004;187:630–634.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Baystate Medical Center/Tufts University School of Medicine, Springfield, Massachusetts

    Sabha Ganai M.D., Jane L. Garb M.S., Prathima Kanumuri M.D., Roshni S. Rao M.D., Albert I. Alexander M.D. & Richard B. Wait M.D., Ph.D.

Authors
  1. Sabha Ganai M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jane L. Garb M.S.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Prathima Kanumuri M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Roshni S. Rao M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Albert I. Alexander M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Richard B. Wait M.D., Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard B. Wait M.D., Ph.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ganai, S., Garb, J.L., Kanumuri, P. et al. Mapping the rectum: Spatial analysis of transanal endoscopic microsurgical outcomes using GIS technology. J Gastrointest Surg 10, 22–31 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2005.08.030

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2005.08.030

Key words

Search

Navigation