Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Case-control comparison of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy

  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is becoming an increasingly used modality in the surgical treatment of pancreatic disease. The assumption is that this will lead to shorter hospitalization and faster recovery. However, actual comparative data between open and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is lacking. The purpose of this study is to compare these surgical procedures. All patients who underwent either laparoscopic or open distal pancreatectomy/splenectomy were reviewed. Fifteen patients underwent laparoscopic resection, whereas 41 underwent an open resection. The 15 laparoscopic patients were matched to 15 open patients for age, gender, and pancreatic pathology. Data gathered included length of stay, pancreatic leak, postoperative complications, and return to normal activity. Of the 15 laparoscopic patients, three were converted to open operations. Laparoscopic patients had a median length of stay of 5 days (range, 3–9) compared with 8 days (range, 6–23) for the open patients (P = 0.02). The pancreatic leak rate was 13% in each group. Overall postoperative complication rate was 20% in the laparoscopic group compared with 27% in the open group. Laparoscopic patients reported a return to normal activity in 3 weeks (range, 2–7) compared with 6 weeks (range, 4–10) for open patients (P =0.03). Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy/splenectomy does lead to shorter hospital stay and faster return to normal activity. Pancreatic leak rate and overall complication rate appear similar.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Opie EL. The relation of cholelithiasis to disease of the pancreas and to fat-necrosis. Johns Hopkins Hosp Bull 1901; 12:19–21.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Opie EL. The etiology of acute hemorrhagic pancreatitis. Johns Hopkins Hosp Bull 1901;12:182–188.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ranson JH. The timing of biliary surgery in acute pancreatitis. Ann Surg 1979;189:654–663.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kelly TR. Gallstone pancreatitis: the timing of surgery. Surgery 1980;88:345–350.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Paloyan D, Simonowitz D, Skinner DB. The timing of biliary tract operations in patients with pancreatitis associated with gallstones. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1975;141:737–739.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Steinberg W, Tenner S. Acute pancreatitis. N Engl J Med 1994;330:1198–1210.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Davidson BR, Neoptolemos JP, Carr-Locke DL. Endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct calculi in patients with gall bladder in situ considered unfit for surgery. Gut 1988;29:114–120.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Connor S, Alexakis N, Raraty MG, Ghaneh P, Evans J, Hughes M, Garvey CJ, Sutton R, Neoptolemos JP. Early and late complications after pancreatic necrosectomy. Surgery 2005;137:499–505.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Beger HG, Rau B, Mayer J, Pralle U. Natural course of acute pancreatitis. World J Surg 1997;21:130–135.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Neoptolemos JP, Carr-Locke DL, London NJ, Bailey IA, James D, Fossard DP. Controlled trial of urgent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic sphincterotomy versus conservative treatment for acute pancreatitis due to gallstones. Lancet 1988;2(8618):979–983.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fan ST, Lai EC, Mok FP, Lo CM, Zheng SS, Wong J. Early treatment of acute biliary pancreatitis by endoscopic papillotomy. N Engl J Med 1993;328:228–232.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Folsch UR, Nitsche R, Ludtke R, Hilgers RA, Creutzfeldt W. Early ERC and papillotomy compared with conservative treatment for acute biliary pancreatitis. N Engl J Med 1997;336:237–242.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Chang L, Lo S, Stabile BE, Lewis RJ, Toosie K, de Virgilio C. Preoperative versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in mild to moderate gallstone pancreatitis: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 2000;231:82–87.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Nealon WH, Bawduniak J, Walser EM. Appropriate timing of cholecystectomy in patients who present with moderate to severe gallstone pancreatitis-associated acute pancreatitis with peripancreatic fluid collections. Ann Surg 2004;239:741–751.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Uhl W, Muller CA, Krahenbuhl L, Schmid SW, Scholzel St, Buchler MW. Acute gallstone pancreatitis: timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in mild and severe disease. Surg Endosc 1999;13:1070–1076.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Uomo G, Manes G, Laccetti M, Cavallera A, Rabitti PG. Endoscopic sphincterotomy and recurrence of acute pancreatitis in gallstone patients considered unfit for surgery. Pancreas 1997;14:28–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hui CK, Lai KC, Yuen MF, Wong WM, Chan AOO, Ng M, et al. The role of cholecystectomy in reducing recurrent gallstone pancreatitis. Endoscopy 2004;36:206–211.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kaw M, Al-Antably Y, Kaw P. Management of gallstone pancreatitis: cholecystectomy or ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;56:61–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Vazquez-Lglesias JL, Gonzalez-Conde B, Lopez-Roses L, Estevez-Prieto E, Alonso-Aguirre P, et al. Endoscopic sphinctertomy for prevention of the recurrence of acute biliary pancreatitis in patients with gallbladder in situ: long-term follow-up of 88 patients. Surg Endosc 2004;18:1442–1446.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hernandez V, Pascual I, Almela P, et al. Recurrence of acute gallstone pancreatitis and relationship with cholecystectomy or endoscopic sphincterotomy. Am J Gastroenterol 2004;99:2417–2423.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hammarstrom LE, Stridbeck H, Ihse I. Long-term followup after endoscopic treatment of bile duct calculi in cholecystectomized patients. World J Surg 1996;20:272–276.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hammarstrom LE, Stridbeck H, Ihse I. Effect of endoscopic sphincterotomy and interval cholecystectyomy on late outcome after gallstone pancreatitis. Br J Surg 1998;85:333–336.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Targarona EM, Ayuso RM, Bordas JM, et al. Randomised trial of endoscopic sphincterotomy with gallbladder left in situ versus open surgery for common bile duct calculi in high-risk patients. Lancet 1996;347:926–929.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Heider R, Meyer AA, Galanko JA, Behrns KE. Percutaneous drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts is associated with a higher failure rate than surgical treatment in unselected patients. Ann Surg 1999;229:781–789.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Vitas GJ, Sarr MG. Selected management of pancreatic pseudocysts: operative versus expectant management. Surgery 1992;111:123–130.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Yeo CJ, Bastidas JA, Lynch-Nyhan A, Fishman EK, Zinner MJ, Cameron JL. The natural history of pancreatic pseudocysts documented by computed tomography. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1990;170:411–417.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ashley SW, Perez A, Pierce EA, et al. Necrotizing pancreatitis: contemporary analysis of 99 consecutive cases. Ann Surg 2001;234:572–580.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of General Surgery, K-8, Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 West Grand Blvd., 48202-2689, Detroit, MI

    Vic Velanovich M.D.

Authors
  1. Vic Velanovich M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vic Velanovich M.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Velanovich, V. Case-control comparison of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 10, 95–98 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2005.08.009

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2005.08.009

Key words

Search

Navigation