Abstract
Flexible endoscope-based endoluminal and transgastric surgery for cholecystectomy, appendectomy, bariatric, and antireflux procedures show promise as a less invasive form of surgery. Current endoscopes and instruments are inadequate to perform such complex surgeries for a variety of reasons: they are too flexible and are insufficient to provide robust grasping and anatomic retraction. The lack of support for a retroflexed endoscope in the peritoneal cavity makes it hard to reach remote structures and makes vigorous retraction of tissues and organs difficult. There is also a need for multiple channels in scopes to allow use of several instruments and to provide traction/countertraction. Finally, secure means of tissue approximation are critical. The aim was to develop and test a new articulating flexible endoscopic system for endoluminal and transgastric endosurgery. A multidisciplinary group of gastrointestinal physicians and surgeons worked with medical device engineers to develop new devices and instruments. Needs assessments and design parameters were developed by consensus. Prototype devices were tested using inanimate models until usable devices were arrived at. The devices were tested in nonsurvival pigs and dogs. The devices were accessed through an incision in the wall of the stomach and manipulated in the peritoneal cavity to accomplish four different tasks: right upper quadrant wedge liver biopsy, right lower quadrant cecal retraction, left lower quadrant running small bowel, and left lower quadrant exposure of esophageal hiatus. In another three pigs, transgastric cholecystectomy was attempted. The positions of the device, camera, and endosurgical instruments, with and without ShapeLock technology, were recorded using laparoscopy and endoscopy and procedure times and success rates were measured. Instrument design parameters and their engineering solutions are described. Flexible multilumen guides which could be locked in position, including a prototype which allowed triangulation, were constructed. Features of the 18-mm devices include multidirectional mid body and/or tip angulation, two 5.5-mm accessory channels allowing the use of large (5-mm) flexible endosurgical instruments, as well as a 4-mm channel for an ultraslim prototype video endoscope (Pentax 4 mm). Using the resulting devices, the four designated transgastric procedures were performed in anesthetized animals. One hundred percent of the transgastric endosurgical procedures were accomplished with the exception of a 50% success for hiatal exposure, a 90% success rate for wedge liver biopsy, and a 33.3% success rate for cholecystectomy. A new endosurgical multilumen device and advanced instrumentation allowed effective transgastric exploration and procedures in the abdominal cavity including retraction of the liver and stomach to allow exposure of the gallbladder, retraction of the cecum, manipulation of the small bowel, and exposure of the esophageal hiatus. This technology may serve as the needed platform for transgastric cholecystectomy, gastric reduction, fundoplication, hiatus hernia repair, or other advanced endosurgical procedures.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Robinson TN, Steigmann GV. Minimally invasive surgery. Endoscopy 2004;36:48–51.
Chand B, Felsher J, Ponsky J. Future trends in flexible endoscopy. Semin Laparosc Surg 2003;10:49–54.
Beger HG, Schwarz A, Bergmann U. Progress in gastrointestinal tract surgery: the impact of gastrointestinal endoscopy. Surg Endosc 2003;17:342–350.
Portale G, Filipi CJ, Peters JH. A current assessment of endoluminal approaches to the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Surg Innov 2004;11:225–234.
Rajan E, Gostout CJ, Feitoza AB, et al. Widespread EMR: a new technique for removal of large areas of mucosa. Gastrointest Endosc 2004;60:623–627.
Soetikno RM, Gotoda T, Nakanishi Y, Soehendra N. Endoscopic mucosal resection. Gastrointest Endosc 2003;57:567–579.
Fritscher-Ravens A, Mosse CA, Muckherjee D, Mills T, Park PO, Swain CP. Transluminal endosurgery: single lumen access anastomotic device for flexible endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2003;58:585–591.
Cope C, Ginsberg GG. Long term patency of experimental magnetic compression anastamosis achieved with covered stents. Gastrointest Endosc 2001;53:780–784.
Richards WO, Rattner DW. Endoluminal and transluminal surgery: no longer if, but when. Surg Endosc 2005;19:461–463.
Kalloo AN, Singh VK, Jagannath SB, et al. Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity. Gastrointest Endosc 2004;60:114–117.
Hu B, Chung SC, Sun LC, et al. Transoral obesity surgery: endoluminal gastroplasty with an endoscopic suture device. Endoscopy 2005;37:411–414.
Fritscher-Ravens A, Mosse CA, Muckherjee D, Mills T, Park PO, Swain CP. Transgastric Gastropexy and hiatal hernia repair for GERD under EUS control: a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 2004;59:89–95.
Park PO, Bergstrom M, Ikeda K, Fritscher-Ravens A, Swain P. Experimental studies of transgastric gallbladder surgery: Cholecystectomy and cholecystogastric anastomosis (videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2005;61:601–606.
Jagannath SB, Kantsevoy SV, Vaughn CA, et al. Peroral transgastric endoscopic ligation of fallopian tubes with long-term survival in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 2005;61:449–453.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Partially funded and supported by USGI Medical, San Clemente, California.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Swanstrom, L.L., Kozarek, R., Pasricha, P.J. et al. Development of a new access device for transgastric surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 9, 1129–1137 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2005.08.005
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2005.08.005