Skip to main content
Log in

Long-term outcome of laparoscopic antireflux surgery in the elderly

  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

The aim of this retrospective study was to compare results and five-year surgical outcome of laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS) in patients younger than 65 years and elderly patients aged 65 years or older. From January 1992 to December 1998, 2684 patients underwent LARS in 31 surgical units; 369 elderly patients (group 1) were compared with 2315 younger patients (group 2). Elderly patients have a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists score (mean, 2.38 versus 1.98). The conversion rate was higher in group 1 (10.2%, n = 38 versus 6.1%, n = 142), as was the morbidity rate (7.6% in group 1 versus 4.5% in group 2). Mean hospital stay was longer for group 1 (7.6 ± 5.6 days versus 5.9 ± 2.8 days). Functional evaluation was excellent in both groups (91-93%) at 3 months and 2 and 5 years. LARS in the elderly is a safe and efficient procedure. Good results appear to be sustainable in the long term.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Peters JH, DeMeester TR. Indications, principles of proce-dures selection, and technique of laparoscopic Nissen fundo-plication. Semin Laparosc Surg 1995;2:27–44.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jamal MM, Quseem T. Medical management of gastro-esophageal reflux disease. In: Zucker KA, ed. Surgical Lapa-roscopy, 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa:Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001, pp 335–349.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hinder RA, Filipi CJ, Wetscher G, et al. Laparoscopic Nis-sen fundoplication is an effective treatment for gastroesoph-ageal reflux disease. Ann Surg 1994;220:472–483.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hunter JG, Trus TL, Branum GD, et al. A physiologic ap-proach to laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal disease. Ann Surg 1996;223:673–687.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Swanstrom L, Wayne R. Spectrum of gastrointestinal symp-toms after laparoscopic fundoplication. Am J Surg 1994;167:538–541.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Brunt LM, Quasebarth MA, Dunnegan DL, Soper NJ. Is laparoscopic antireflux surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease in the elderly safe and effective? Surg Endosc 1999; 13:838–842.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Khajanchee YS, Urbach DR, Butler N, et al. Laparoscopic antireflux surgery in the elderly. Surgical outcome and effect on quality of life. Surg Endosc 2002;16:25–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Trus TL, Laycock WS, Wo JM, et al. Laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery in the elderly. Am J Gastroenterol 1998;93:351–353.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bammer T, Hinder RA, Klaus A, et al. Safety and long-term outcome of laparoscopic antireflux surgery in patients in their eighties and older. Surg Endosc 2002;16:40–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhu H, Pace F, Sangaletti O, Porro GB. Features of symp-tomatic gastroesophageal reflux in elderly patients. Scand J Gastroenterol 1993;28:235–238.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hetzel DJ, Dent J, Reed WD, et al. Healing and relapse of severe peptic esophagitis after treatment with omeprazole. Gastroenterology 1988;95:903–912.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. DeMeester TR, Stein HJ. Minimizing the side effects of anti-reflux surgery. World J Surg 1992;16:335–336.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Spivak H, Lelcuk S, Hunter JG. Laparoscopic surgery of the gastroesophageal junction. World J Surg 1999;23:356–367.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Stein HJ, Feussner H, Siewert JR. Anti-reflux surgery: a cur-rent comparison of open and laparoscopic approaches. Hep-atogastroenterology 1998;45:1328–1337.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sakllad M. Grading of patients for surgical procedure. Anaesthesiology 1941;2:281–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zimmerman J, Shohat V, Tsvang E, et al. Esophagitis is a major cause of upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage in the elderly. Scand J Gastroenterol 1997;32:906–909.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Allen R, Rappaport W, Hixson L, et al. Referral patterns and the results of antireflux operations in patients more than sixty years of age. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1991;173:359–362.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Collen MJ, Abdulian JD, Chen YK. Gastroesophageal reflux disease in the elderly: more severe disease that requires ag-gressive therapy. Am J Gastroenterol 1995;90:1053–1057.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wo JM, Branum GD, Hunter JG, et al. Clinical features of type III (mixed) paraesophageal hernia. Am J Gastroenterol 1996;91:914–916.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Trus TL, Bax T, Richardson WS, et al. Complications of laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair. J Gastrointest Surg 1997;1:221–228.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Pierre Arnaud M.D..

Additional information

The study participants are listed at the end of the article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brehant, O., Pessaux, P., Arnaud, JP. et al. Long-term outcome of laparoscopic antireflux surgery in the elderly. J Gastrointest Surg 10, 439–444 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2005.06.017

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2005.06.017

Key words

Navigation