Skip to main content
Log in

Abdominal drainage was unnecessary after hepatectomy using the conventional clamp crushing technique

  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

A prophylactic abdominal drainage catheter is routinely inserted by many surgeons in patients after hepatic resection. Between January 2002 and September 2004, 462 consecutive patients who had undergone hepatic resection using a clamp crushing method by the same surgical team were retrospectively divided into the drainage group (n = 357) and the nondrainage group (n = 105). There was no difference in hospital mortality between the two groups of patients (drainage group, 0.6% vs. nondrainage group, 0%; P = 1.0). However, there was a greater incidence of surgical complications in the drainage group (31.4% vs. 8.6%, P < 0.001), and greater incidence of wound complications and subphrenic complications in the drainage group compared to the nondrainage group (24.4% vs. 4.8%, P < 0.001). In addition, the mean (+- SEM) postoperative hospital stay of the drainage group was 13 +- 6.5 days, which was significantly longer than that of the nondrainage group (9.7 +- 3.3 days, P = 0.001). On multivariate analysis, abdominal drainage and intraoperative bleeding were the independent risk factors that were significantly associated with the incidence of drainage-related complications. The results suggested that routine abdominal drainage is unnecessary after hepatic resection when the conventional clamp crushing method is used during parenchyma transection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Moss JP. Historical and current perspectives on surgical drainage. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1981;152(4):517–527.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Robinson JO. Surgical drainage: An historical perspective. Br J Surg 1986;73(6):422–426.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dougherty SH, Simmons RL. The biology and practice of surgical drains. Part 1. Curr Probl Surg 1992;29(8):559–623.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Budd DC, Cochran RC, Fouty WJ Jr. Cholecystectomy with and without drainage. A randomized, prospective study of 300 patients. Am J Surg 1982;143(3):307–309.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lewis RT, Goodall RG, Marien B, Park M, Lloyd-Smith W, Wiegand FM. Simple elective cholecystectomy: To drain or not. Am J Surg 1990;159(2):241–245.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Monson JR, Guillou PJ, Keane FB, Tanner WA, Brennan TG. Cholecystectomy is safer without drainage: The results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Surgery 1991;109(6):740–746.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim J, Lee J, Hyung WJ, et al. Gastric cancer surgery without drains: A prospective randomized trial. J GASTROINTEST SURG 2004;8(6):727–732.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cerise EJ, Pierce WA, Diamond DL. Abdominal drains: Their role as a source of infection following splenectomy. Ann Surg 1970;171(5):764–769.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Heslin MJ, Harrison LE, Brooks AD, Hochwald SN, Coit DG, Brennan MF. Is intra-abdominal drainage necessary after pancreaticoduodenectomy?.J GASTROINTEST SURG 1998;2(4):373–378.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Conlon KC, Labow D, Leung D, et al. Prospective randomized clinical trial of the value of intraperitoneal drainage after pancreatic resection. Ann Surg 2001;234(4):487–493.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pai D, Sharma A, Kanungo R, Jagdish S, Gupta A. Role of abdominal drains in perforated duodenal ulcer patients: A prospective controlled study. Aust N Z J Surg 1999;69(3):210–213.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hoffmann J, Shokouh-Amiri MH, Damm P, Jensen R. A prospective, controlled study of prophylactic drainage after colonic anastomoses. Dis Colon Rectum 1987;30(6):449–452.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Merad F, Yahchouchi E, Hay JM, Fingerhut A, Laborde Y, Langlois-Zantain O. Prophylactic abdominal drainage after elective colonic resection and suprapromontory anastomosis: A multicenter study controlled by randomization. Arch Surg 1998;133(3):309–314.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sagar PM, Hartley MN, Macfie J, Mancey-Jones B, Sedman P, May J. Randomized trial of pelvic drainage after rectal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38(3):254–258.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Merad F, Hay JM, Fingerhut A, et al. Is prophylactic pelvic drainage useful after elective rectal or anal anastomosis? A multicenter controlled randomized trial. Surgery 1999; 125(5):529–535.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bona S, Gavelli A, Huguet C. The role of abdominal drainage after major hepatic resection. Am J Surg 1994;167(6):593–595.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Franco D, Karaa A, Meakins JL, Borgonovo G, Smadja C, Grange D. Hepatectomy without abdominal drainage. Results of a prospective study in 61 patients. Ann Surg 1989; 210(6):748–750.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Belghiti J, Kabbej M, Sauvanet A, Vilgrain V, Panis Y, Fekete F. Drainage after elective hepatic resection. A randomized trial. Ann Surg 1993;218(6):748–753.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Fong Y, Brennan MF, Brown K, Heffernan N, Blumgart LH. Drainage is unnecessary after elective liver resection. Am J Surg 1996;171(1):158–162.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu CL, Fan ST, Lo CM, et al. Abdominal drainage after hepatic resection is contraindicated in patients with chronic liver diseases. Ann Surg 2004;239(2):194–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Andersson R, Saarela A, Tranberg KG, Bengmark S. Intraabdominal abscess formation after major liver resection. Acta Chir Scand 1990;156(10):707–710.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Gillmore D, McSwain NE Jr., Browder IW. Hepatic trauma: To drain or not to drain? J Trauma 1987;27(8):898–902.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. StrasbergSM, Belghiti J,Clavien PA. The Brisbane 2000 terminology of liver anatomy and resections. HPB 2000;2:333–339.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fong Y, Fortner J, Sun RL, Brennan MF, Blumgart LH. Clinical score for predicting recurrence after hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: Analysis of 1001 consecutive cases. Ann Surg 1999;230(3):309–318.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Scheele J, Stangl R, Altendorf-Hofmann A, Gall FP. Indicators of prognosis after hepatic resection for colorectal secondaries. Surgery 1991;110(1):13–29.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Choti MA, Sitzmann JV, Tiburi MF, et al. Trends in longterm survival following liver resection for hepatic colorectal metastases. Ann Surg 2002;235(6):759–766.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fong Y, Cohen AM, Fortner JG, et al. Liver resection for colorectal metastases. J Clin Oncol 1997;15(3):938–946.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Liu CL, Fan ST, Lo CM, Chan SC, Yong BH, Wong J. Safety of donor right hepatectomy without abdominal drainage: A prospective evaluation in 100 consecutive liver donors. Liver Transpl 2005;11(3):314–319.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Voros D, Gouliamos A, Kotoulas G, Kouloheri D, Saloum G, Kalovidouris A. Percutaneous drainage of intra-abdominal abscesses using large lumen tubes under computed tomographic control. Eur J Surg 1996;162(11):895–898.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Elboim CM, Goldman L, Hann L, Palestrant AM, Silen W. Significance of post-cholecystectomy subhepatic fluid collections. Ann Surg 1983;198(2):137–141.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Gerzof SG, Johnson WC, Robbins AH, Nabseth DC. Intrahepatic pyogenic abscesses: Treatment by percutaneous drainage. Am J Surg 1985;149(4):487–494.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Mueller PR, vanSonnenberg E, Ferrucci JT Jr. Percutaneous drainage of 250 abdominal abscesses and fluid collections. Part II: Current procedural concepts. Radiology 1984; 151(2):343–347.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. vanSonnenberg E, Mueller PR, Ferrucci JT Jr. Percutaneous drainage of 250 abdominal abscesses and fluid collections. Part I: Results, failures, and complications. Radiology 1984;151(2):337–341.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Hemming A, Davis NL, Robins RE. Surgical versus percutaneous drainage of intra-abdominal abscesses. Am J Surg 1991;161(5):593–595.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Noyes LD, Doyle DJ, McSwain NE Jr. Septic complications associated with the use of peritoneal drains in liver trauma. J Trauma 1988;28(3):337–346.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Fabian TC, Croce MA, Stanford GG, et al. Factors affecting morbidity following hepatic trauma. A prospective analysis of 482 injuries. Ann Surg 1991;213(6):540–547.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hui-Chuan Sun M.D., Ph.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lu, L., Sun, HC., Qin, LX. et al. Abdominal drainage was unnecessary after hepatectomy using the conventional clamp crushing technique. J Gastrointest Surg 10, 302–308 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2005.06.002

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2005.06.002

Key words

Navigation