Skip to main content
Log in

Outcomes of cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis

  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for treatment of symptomatic common bile duct stones (CBDS) after endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) is associated with increased conversion and complications compared with other indications. We examined factors associated with conversion and complications of LC after ES. A retrospective study of 32 patients undergoing ES for CBDS followed by cholecystectomy was undertaken. Surgical outcomes for this group were compared with a control population of 499 LCs for all other indications. Factors associated with open cholecystectomy and complications in the ES group were analyzed. Patients undergoing LC preceded by ES had a significantly higher complication (odds ratio [OR] = 7.97; 95% CI, 2.84–22.5) and conversion rate (OR = 3.45; 95% CI, 1.56–7.66) compared with LC for all other indications. Pre-ES serum bilirubin greater than 5 mg/dL was predictive of conversion (positive predictive value = 63%, P < 0.005). Patients with symptomatic CBDS that undergo LC after ES have higher complication and conversion rates than patients undergoing LC without ES. Pre-ES serum bilirubin is useful in identifying patients who may not have a successful laparoscopic approach at cholecystectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cuschieri A, Croce E, Faggioni A, et al. EAES ductal stone study. Preliminary findings of multi-center prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage vs single-stage management. Surg Endosc 1996;10:1130–1135.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lezoche E, Paganini AM, Carlei F, et al. Laparoscopic treatment of gallbladder and common bile duct stones: A prospective study. World J Surg 1996;20:535–541.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Tokumura H, Umezawa A, Cao H, et al. Laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones: Transcystic approach and choledochotomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2002; 9:206–212.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Poon RT, Liu CL, Lo CM, et al. Management of gallstone cholangitis in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 2001;136:11–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hammarstrom LE, Holmin T, Stridbeck H. Endoscopic treatment of bile duct calculi in patients with gallbladder in situ: Long-term outcome and factors. Scand J Gastroenterol 1996;31:294–301.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kullman E, Borch K, Dahlin LG, Liedberg G. Long-term follow-up of patients with gallbladder in situ after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis. Eur J Surg 1991;157:131–135.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Schreurs WH, Vles WJ, Stuifbergen WH, Oostvogel HJ. Endoscopic management of common bile duct stones leaving the gallbladder in situ. A cohort study with long-term followup. Dig Surg 2004;21:60–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Boerma D, Rauws EA, Keulemans YC, et al. Wait-and-see policy or laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile-duct stones. A randomised trial. Lancet 2002;360:761–765.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Neoptolemos JP, Shaw DE, Carr-Locke DL. A multivariate analysis of preoperative risk factors in patients with common bile duct stones. Implications for treatment. Ann Surg 1989; 209:157–161.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sarli L, Iusco DR, Roncoroni L. Preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the management of cholecystocholedocholithiasis: 10-year experience. World J Surg 2003;27:180–186.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Brodsky A, Matter I, Sabo E, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: Can the need for conversion and the probability of complications be predicted? A prospective study. Surg Endosc 2000;14:755–760.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Suter M, Meyer A. A 10-year experience with the use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: Is it safe? Surg Endosc 2001;15:1187–1192.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Eldar S, Sabo E, Nash E, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: Prospective trial. World J Surg 1997; 21:540–545.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Eldar S, Sabo E, Nash E, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the various types of gallbladder inflammation: A prospective trial. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1998;8:200–207.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Krastev Z, Vladimirov B, Mateva L, Alexiev A. Quantitative assessment of severity of biliary tract infection. Hepatogastroenterology 1996;43:792–795.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Isogai M, Yamaguchi A, Harada T, et al. Cholangitis score: A scoring system to predict severe cholangitis in gallstone pancreatitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2002;9:98–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Flum DR, Dellinger EP, Cheadle A, et al. Intraoperative cholangiography and risk of common bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. JAMA 2003;289:1639–1644.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mary T. Hawn M.D., M.P.H..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Allen, N.L., Leeth, R.R., Finan, K.R. et al. Outcomes of cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis. J Gastrointest Surg 10, 292–296 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2005.05.013

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2005.05.013

Key words

Navigation