Abstract
In 2001, a dedicated minimally invasive surgery (MIS) program was established at a large university hospital. Changes included improvement and standardization of equipment and instruments, patient care protocols, standardized orders, and staff education. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of this program on an academic surgery practice. From January 1999 through October 2003, hospital and departmental databases were reviewed for all records pertaining to general surgery cases. Data trends were analyzed by regression analysis and are expressed as mean +- SEM. In 1999, 15.0 +- 0.1% of all general surgery cases were MIS cases compared with 30.2 +- 0.1% in 2003 (P < 0.0001). During this period, the number of patients requiring conversion from a laparoscopic to an open approach decreased from 14.4% to 4.0% (P < 0.0007). In 1999, 30% of appendectomies were laparoscopic, compared with 92% in 2003 (P < 0.0001). This increase in the rate of laparoscopic appendectomy resulted in a decrease in average length of hospital stay for all patients with acute appendicitis, from 5.5 +- 1.0 days in 1999 to 2.7 +- 0.2 days in 2003 (P < 0.0001), and a decrease in total hospital cost per case, from $6569 +- 400 in 1999 to $4819 +- 175 in 2002 (P < 0.001). Total operating room time per case for cholecystectomy decreased from 131 +- 3.7 to 108 +- 3.2 minutes (P < 0.0001), and actual surgery time decreased from 95 +- 4.1 to 74 +- 4.0 minutes (P = 0.0006). Implementation of a dedicated MIS program resulted in a significant increase in the number of MIS cases and percentage of general surgery cases performed by MIS. This increase in the utilization of MIS resulted in reduced length of stay and cost and has been accompanied by improvements in operating room efficiency. Changes in practice associated with development of an MIS program have had measurable institutional benefits.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kenyon TA, Lenker MP, Bax TW, et al. Cost and benefit of the trained laparoscopic team. A comparative study of a designated nursing team vs. a nontrained team. Surg Endosc 1997;11:812–814.
Kenyon TA, Urbach DR, Speer JB, et al. Dedicated minimally invasive surgery suites increase operating room efficiency. Surg Endosc 2001;15:1140–1143.
Fowler DL, Hogle N. The impact of a full-time director of minimally invasive surgery: Clinical practice, education, and research. Surg Endosc 2000;14:444–447.
Cervini P, Smith LC, Urbach DR. The surgeon on call is a strong factor determining the use of a laparoscopic approach for appendectomy. Surg Endosc 2002;16:1774–1777.
Allen JW, Polk HC Jr. A study of added costs of laparoscopic cholecystectomy based on surgery preference cards. Am Surg 2002;68:474–476.
Uchiyama K, Takifuji K, Tani M, et al. Effectiveness of the clinical pathway to decrease length of stay and cost for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 2002;16:1594–1597.
Chan SW, Hensman C, Waxman BP, et al. Technical developments and a team approach leads to an improved outcome: Lessons learnt implementing laparoscopic splenectomy. Aust N Z J Surg 2002;72:523–527.
Muller BP, Holzinger F, Leepin H, Klaiber C. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: quality of care and benchmarking. Results of a single-institution specialized in laparoscopy compared with those of a nationwide study in Switzerland. Surg Endosc 2003;17:300–305.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Glasgow, R.E., Adamson, K.A. & Mulvihill, S.J. The benefits of a dedicated minimally invasive surgery program to academic general surgery practice. J Gastrointest Surg 8, 869–873 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2004.08.002
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2004.08.002