Skip to main content
Log in

Omeprazole does not reduce gastroesophageal reflux: new insights using multichannel intraluminal impedance technology

  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery


Proton pump inhibitors are the mainstay of medical management in gastroesophageal reflux disease. Although they provide relief from most symptoms, refluxmay persist.Wehypothesize that omeprazole does not reduce the total amount of gastroesophageal reflux but simply alters its pH characteristics. Six asymptomatic volunteers had combined 24-hour impedance pH monitoring before and after 7 days of omeprazole (20 mg BID). Multichannel intraluminal impedance was used to identify reflux episodes, which were classified as acid (pH < 4), weak acid (pH > 4 but decrease > 1 pH unit) and nonacid (pH > 4 and decrease<1 pHunit) bypH measurements 5 cmabove the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). A gastric pH sensor located 10 cm below the LES was used to verify the action of omeprazole. Impedance detected a total of 116 reflux episodes before and 96 episodes after omeprazole treatment. The median number of reflux episodes (18 versus 16, P = 0.4), median duration of reflux episodes (4.7 versus 3.6 minutes, P = 0.5), and total duration of reflux episodes (27.2 versus 42.4 minutes, P = 0.5) per subject were similar before and after omeprazole. Acid reflux episodes were reduced from 63% before to 2.1% after omeprazole (P = 0.0001), whereas nonacid reflux episodes increased (15% to 76%, P = 0.0001). Weak acid reflux episodes did not change (22.4% to 21.8%, P = 1.0). The proportion of reflux episodes greater than pH 4 increased from 37% to 98% (P = 0.0001). In normal subjects, omeprazole treatment does not affect the number of reflux episodes or their duration; rather it converts acid reflux to less acid reflux, thus exposing esophagus to altered gastric juice. These observations may explain the persistence of symptoms and emergence of mucosal injury white on proton pump inhibitor therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others


  1. Wetscher GJ, Glaser K, Hinder RA, Perdikis G, Klingler P, Bammer T, et al. Respiratory symptoms in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease following medical therapy and following antireflux surgery. Am J Surg 1997;174:639–642.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Oberg S, Johansson J, Wenner J, Johnsson F, Zilling T, von Holstein CS, et al. Endoscopic surveillance of columnarlined esophagus: frequency of intestinal metaplasia detection and impact of antireflux surgery. Ann Surg 2001;234:619–626.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Devault KR, Castell DO. Updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94:1434–1442.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Johnson LF, DeMeester TR. Twenty-four-hourpH monitoring of the distal esophagus. A quantitative measure of gastroesophageal reflux. Am J Gastroenterol 1974;62:325–332.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tutuian R, Vela MF, Balaji NS, Wise JL, Murray JA, Peters JH, et al. Esophageal function testing with combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and manometry: multicenter study in healthy volunteers. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2003;1:174–182.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shay S, Vela M, Tutuian R, Balaji N, Wise J, Adhami T, et al. Twenty-four hour multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH (24h MII-pH): a multicenter report of normal values from 45 healthy volunteers. Gastroenterology 2002;122:A-577.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Skopnik H, Silny J, Heiber O, Schulz J, Rau G, Heimann G. Gastroesophageal reflux in infants: evaluation of a new intraluminal impedance technique. J Pediatric Gastroenterol Nutr 1996;23:591–598.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sifrim D, Holloway R, Silny J, Xin Z, Tack J, Lerut A, et al. Acid, nonacid, and gas reflux in patients with gastroesophageal re.ux disease during ambulatory 24-hour pH-impedance recordings. Gastroenterology 2001;120:1588–1598.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tutuian R, Vela MF, Shay SS, Castell DO. Multichannel intraluminal impedance in esophageal function testing and gastroesophageal reflux monitoring. J Clin Gastroenterol 2003;37:206–215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wenzl TG, Silny J, Schenke S, Peschgens T, Heimann G, Skopnik H. Gastroesophageal reflux and respiratory phenomena in infants: status of the intraluminal impedance technique. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1999;28:423–428.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wenzl TG, Schenke S, Peschgens T, Silny J, Heimann G, Skopnick H. Association of apnea and nonacid gastroesophageal reflux in infants: investigations with the intraluminal impedance technique. Pediatr Pulmonol 2001;31:144–149.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. DeMeester TR. Barrett’s esophagus: the process of intestinalization. Probl Gen Surg 2001;18:31–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chandrasoma PT, Der R, Dalton P, Kobayashi G, Ma Y, Peters J, et al. Distribution and significance of epithelial types in columnar-lined esophagus. Am J Surg Pathol 2001;25:1188–1193.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fitzgerald RC, Omary MB, Triadafilopoulos G. Dynamics effects of acid on Barrett’s esophagus: an ex vivo proliferation and differentiation model. J Clin Invest 1996;98:2120–2128.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Theodorou D, Streets C, Chandrasoma P, Balaji NS, Bruce D, Gattolin A, et al. Comparison of the pH and the intestinal metaplasia density across long segment Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterology 2002;122:A-51.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Vela MF, Camacho-Lobato L, Srinivasan R, Tutuian R, Katz PO, Castell DO. Simultaneous intraesophageal impedance and pH measurement of acid and nonacid gastroesophageal reflux: effect of omeprazole. Gastroenterology 2001;120:1599–1606.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cucchiara S, Minella R, Campanozzi A, Salvia G, Borrelli O, Ciccimarra E, et al. Effects of omeprazole on mechanisms of gastroesophageal reflux in childhood. Dig Dis Sci 1997;42:293–299.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Decktor DL, Krawet SH, Rodriguez SL, Robinson M, Castell DO. Dual site ambulatory pH monitoring: a probe across the lower esophageal sphincter does not induce gastroesophageal reflux. Am J Gastroenterol 1996;91:1162–1166.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tamhankar, A.P., Peters, J.H., Portale, G. et al. Omeprazole does not reduce gastroesophageal reflux: new insights using multichannel intraluminal impedance technology. J Gastrointest Surg 8, 888–896 (2004).

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

Key words