Skip to main content
Log in

Perioperative outcome of laparoscopic left lateral liver resection is improved by using staple line reinforcement technique: A case report

  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Current laparoscopic stapling technology still cannot prevent bile leakage (<55%) along the resection margin. A new staple line reinforcement technique was used in the present case. This technique incorporates an absorbable polymer membrane into the stapler system, such that it buttresses the transected solid organ. The objectives of this novel procedure are to decrease hemorrhage at the staple line and to prevent bile duct leakage after liver resection. A 47-year-old man followed for status post biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch presented with epigastric pain. On imaging, he was found to have a lesion in segment 2–3 of the left lobe of the liver, which measured at least 3 cm in diameter. He was admitted to the hospital to undergo a laparoscopic left lateral liver resection. This procedure involved laparoscopic ultrasonography of the liver and transection of the left liver lobe with endoscopic linear staplers. The staple height of 3.5, 60 mm long, reinforced with an absorbable polymer membrane was used for liver transection to catch the portal branches. This required multiple firings in the liver parenchyma and additional division of some tissue using the Harmonic scalpel. The larger branch in the middle of segment 2–3 and the left hepatic vein were both transected with the novel staple line reinforcement technique. Bleeding or any bile leakage in this area could not be visualized. No drains were left. The patient’s postoperative course was uncomplicated, and he was discharged on postoperative day 3. Pathology results showed a cavernous hemangioma of 4.5 cm in diameter. Staple line reinforcement with the absorbable polymer membrane has the potential to decrease staple line hemorrhage and bile leakage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Montorsi M, Santambrogio R, Bianchi P, et al. Laparoscopy with laparoscopic ultrasound for pretreatment staging of hepatocellular carcinoma: A prospective study. Laparoscopic Ultrasound 2001;5:312–315.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Descottes B, Lachachi F, Durand-Fontanier S, Sodji M, Pech de Laclause B, Valleix D. Traitement laparoscopique des tumeurs solides et kystiques du foie. Étude de 33 cas. Ann Chir 2000;125:941–947.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kamel IR, Choti MA, Horton KM, et al. Surgically staged focal liver lesions: Accuracy and reproducibility of dual-phase helical CT for detection and characterization. Radiology 2003;227:752–757.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Descottes B, Glineur D, Lachachi F, et al. Laparoscopic liver resection of benign liver tumors. Surg Endosc 2003;17:23–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cherqui D, Husson E, Hammoud R, et al. Laparoscopic liver resections: A feasibility study in 30 patients. Ann Surg 2000; 232:753–762.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mouiel J, Kathkouda N, Gugenheim J, Fabiani P. Possibilities of laparoscopic liver resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2000;7:1–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gramática L Jr, Herrera MF, Mercado-Luna A, Sierra M, Verasay G, Brunner N. Videolaparoscopic resection of insulinomas: Experience in two institutions. World J Surg 2002; 26:1297–1300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Furihata M, Tagaya N, Kubota K. Laparoscopic enucleation of insulinoma in the pancreas. Case report and review of the literature. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2001;11:279–283.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fernández-Cruz L, Sáenz A, Astudillo E, et al. Outcome of laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: Endocrine and nonendocrine tumors. World J Surg 2002;26:1057–1065.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Brolin RE. Laboratory evaluation of four techniques of stapled gastroplasty. Surgery 1985;97:66–71.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Katz AR, Mukherjee DP, Kaganov AL, Gordon S. A new synthetic mono.lament absorbable suture made from polytrimethylene carbonate. Surg gynecol obstet 1985;161:213–222.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bourne RB, Bitar H, Andreae PR, Martin LM, Finlay JB, Marquis F. In-vivo comparison of four absorbable sutures: Vicryl, Dexon Plus, Maxon and PDS. Can J Surg 1988;31:43–45.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sanz LE, Patterson JA, Kamath R, Willett G, Ahmed SW, Butter.eld AB. Comparison of Maxon suture with Vicryl, chromic catgut, and PDS sutures in fascial closure in rats. Obstet Gynecol 1988;71:418–422.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Metz SA, Chegini N, Masterson BJ. In vivo and in vitro degradation of mono.lament absorbable sutures, PDS and Maxon. Biomaterials 1990;11:41–45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kangas J, Paasimaa S, Makela P, et al. Comparison of strength of poly-L/D-lactide (PLDLA) 96/4 and polyglyconate sutures: In vitro, in the subcutis, and in the Achilles tendon of rabbits. Inc J Biomed Mater Res 2001;58:121–126.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kawamura M, Kase K, Sawafuji M, Watanabe M, Horinouchi H, Kobayashi K. Staple-line reinforcement with a new type of polyglycolic acid felt. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2001;11:43–46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Miller JI, Landreneau RJ, Wright CE, Santucci TS, Sammons BH. A comparative study of buttressed versus nonbuttressed staple line in pulmonary resections. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:319–322.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Murray KD, Ho CH, Hsia JY, Little AG. The in.uence of pulmonary staple line reinforcement on air leaks. Chest 2002; 122:2146–2149.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Itoh E, Matsuda S, Yamauchi K, et al. Synthetic absorbable film for prevention of air leaks after stapled pulmonary resection. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;53:640–645.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Fischel RJ, McKenna RJ. Bovine pericardium versus bovine collagen to buttress staples for lung reduction operations. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;65:217–219.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hazelrigg SR, Boley TM, Naunheim KS, et al. Effect of bovine pericardial strips on air leak after stapled pulmonary resection. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;63:1573–1575.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Shikora SA, Kim JJ, Tarnoff ME. Reinforcing gastric staplelines with bovine pericardial strips may decrease the likelihood of gastric leak after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg 2003;13:37–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chae FH, McIntyre RC, Stiegmann GV. Laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc 1999;13:547–549.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Shamji MF, Maziak DE, Shamji FM, Matzinger FR, Perkins DG. Surgical staple metalloptysis after apical bullectomy: A reaction to bovine pericardium? Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 74:258–261.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Provencher S, Deslauriers J. Late complication of bovine pericardium patches used for lung volume reduction surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2003;23:1059–1061.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ahmed S, Marzouk K, Bhuiya T, Iqbal M, Rossol L. Asymptomatic expectoration of surgical staples complicating lung volume reduction surgery. Chest 2001;119:307–308.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Oey I, Waller D. Metalloptysis: A late complication of lung volume reduction surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:1694–1695.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michel Gagner M.D., F.A.C.S., F.R.C.S.C..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Consten, E.C.J., Gagner, M. Perioperative outcome of laparoscopic left lateral liver resection is improved by using staple line reinforcement technique: A case report. J Gastrointest Surg 9, 360–364 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2004.07.016

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2004.07.016

Key words

Navigation