Skip to main content
Log in

Magnetic resonance imaging provides accurate and precise volume determination of the regenerating mouse liver

  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Direct and repetitive noninvasive determination of the time course and the strain-specific hepatic regenerative capacity after partial hepatectomy can extend our knowledge about the basic mechanisms of liver regeneration and repair. The aim of this study was to develop a magnetic resonance (MR)-based volumetric procedure to measure the hepatic volume in the regenerating mouse liver. In Balb-C mice (n = 14), varying amounts of liver tissue were resected and MR imaging was performed 24 hours later in a 1.5 TeslaMagnet Unit. Three dimensional (3D) T1- (volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination [VIBE] sequence) and T2-weighted images were acquired with continuous 1-mm thin slices. Animals with and without intravenous administration of paramagnetic contrast agents were compared. Immediately after MR examination, mice were euthanized and livers were weighted. The liver volume was determined on MR images using Cavalieri’s method and linear regression analysis was performed from the data obtained. Correlation coefficients between the liver volume measured by MR and the liver weight were 0.98 (T1) and 0.94 (T2) in the group without paramagnetic contrast injection and 0.70 (T1) and 0.96 (T2) after paramagnetic contrast application. We conclude that MR-based liver volumetry allows precise liver volume measurement during hepatic regeneration after partial hepatectomy in mice and can be a valuable tool with regard to experimental hepatology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Higgins GM, Anderson RM. Experimental pathology of the liver: Restoration of the liver of the white rat following partial surgical removal. Arch Pathol 1931;12:186–202.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rahman TM, Hodgson HJ. Animal models of acute hepatic failure. Int J Exp Pathol 2000;81:145–157.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Paulsen JE. Variations in regenerative growth of mouse liver following partial hepatectomy. In Vivo 1990;4:235–238.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Michalopoulos GK, DeFrances MC. Liver regeneration. Science 1997;276:60–66.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bennett LM, Farnham PJ, Drinkwater NR. Strain-dependent differences in DNA synthesis and gene expression in the regenerating livers of CB57BL/6J and C3H/HeJ mice. Mol Carcinog 1995;14:46–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Poltoranina VS, Sorokina TV. [Alpha-fetoprotein synthesis during liver regeneration in adult mice of different strains]. Biull Eksp Biol Med 1978;86:71–75.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Albrecht JH, Poon RY, Ahonen CL, Rieland BM, Deng C, Crary GS. Involvement of p21 and p27 in the regulation of CDK activity and cell cycle progression in the regenerating liver. Oncogene 1998;16:2141–2150.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Patrizio G, Pietroletti R, Pavone P, Foti N, Tettamanti E, Ventura T, Simi M, Passariello R. [An animal model for the study of liver regeneration by magnetic resonance imaging]. Radiol Med (Torino) 1990;79:453–457.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cockman MD, Hayes DA, Kuzmak BR. Motion suppression improves quantification of rat liver volume in vivo by magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 1993;30:355–360.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pleskovic A, Demsar F, Suput D. Assessment of liver regeneration by quantitative MRI analysis. Pflugers Arch 1996;431:R307-R308.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hockings PD, Roberts T, Campbell SP, Reid DG, Greenhill RW, Polley SR, Nelson P, Bertram TA, Kramer K. Longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging quantitation of rat liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy. Toxicol Pathol 2002;30:606–610.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Palmes D, Spiegel HU. Animal models of liver regeneration. Biomaterials 2004;25:1601–1611.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pache JC, Roberts N, Vock P, Zimmermann A, Cruz- Orive LM. Vertical LM sectioning and parallel CT scanning designs for stereology: Application to human lung. J. Microsc 1993;170:9–24.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Van Zutphen LFM, Baumans V, Beynen AC. Principles of Laboratory Animal Science. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Inderbitzin M.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Inderbitzin, D., Gass, M., Beldi, G. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging provides accurate and precise volume determination of the regenerating mouse liver. J Gastrointest Surg 8, 806–811 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2004.07.013

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2004.07.013

Key words

Navigation