Deutsche Zeitschrift für Akupunktur

, Volume 56, Issue 1, pp 25–26 | Cite as

Can I help you? Physicians’ expectations as predictor for treatment outcome

  • C. M. Witt
  • F. Martins
  • S. N. Willich
  • L. Schuützler
  • Romy Lauche
Journal Club



Patients’ expectations of acupuncture treatment have widely been investigated; however, little focus has been on the physicians’ expectations. We aimed to investigate (1) which patient characteristics lead to different expectations of physicians, and (2) whether physicians’ expectations predict pain reduction and physical functioning in acupuncture and usual care treatment for chronic pain.


In four large multi-center, randomized trials patients with chronic pain were randomized to receive usual care alone or 10 additional acupuncture treatments. Data were pooled. Baseline characteristics of the three expectation groups were compared, and the physicians’ expectation and its interaction with the treatment group were included in two linear regression models predicting pain reduction and change in physical functioning. Other patient characteristics were included for adjustment.


9,900 patients treated by 2,781 physicians were analysed. Age, education and disease-related variables differed in the expectation groups. There was no interaction between treatment group and expectation. Patients, for whom the physicians had expected substantial improvement, showed more pain reduction (p < 0.001) and better physical functioning (p < 0.001) than patients for whom moderate improvement was expected. No significant differences were found between expected moderate and expected lack of success. However, the proportion of explained variance that was due to physicians’ expectations was small considering total explained variance.


Physicians’ high expectations at baseline predict better outcome, independent of the treatment. Since we adjusted for several patient variables including duration and severity of disease, this cannot be explained by prognostic factors only. Other explanations are discussed and recommended for future research.


  1. 1.
    Foster NE, Thomas E, Hill JC, Hay EM. The relationship between patient and practitioner expectations and preferences and clinical outcomes in a trial of exercise and acupuncture for knee osteoarthritis. European Journal of Pain, 2010; 14(4):402–9CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Harborow PW, Ogden J. The effectiveness of an acupuncturist working in general practice — an audit. Acupuncture Medicine 2004; 22,214–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jena S., Witt CM, Brinkhaus B, Wegscheider K, Willich SN. Acupuncture in patients with headache. Cephalalgia 2008; 28:969–79CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Witt CM, Jena S, Brinkhaus B, Liecker B, Wegscheider K et al. Acupuncture for patients with chronic neck pain. Pain 2006a; 125:98–106CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Witt CM, Jena S, Brinkhaus B, Liecker B, Wegscheider K et al. Acupuncture in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee or hip: A randomized, controlled trial with an additional nonrandomized arm. Arthritis and Rheumatism 2006b; 54: 3485–93CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Witt CM, Jena S, Selim D, Brinkhaus B, Reinhold T et al. Pragmatic randomized trial evaluating the clinical and economic effectiveness of acupuncture for chronic low back pain. American Journal of Epidemiology 2006c; 164: 487–96CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. M. Witt
    • 1
    • 2
  • F. Martins
    • 1
  • S. N. Willich
    • 1
  • L. Schuützler
    • 1
  • Romy Lauche
    • 3
  1. 1.Epidemiology, and Health Economics, Charité University Medical CenterInstitute for Social MedicineBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Center for Integrative MedicineUniversity of Maryland School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA
  3. 3.Klinik für Naturheilkunde und Integrative MedizinUniversität Duisburg-EssenEssenDeutschland

Personalised recommendations