Advertisement

Journal of Bionic Engineering

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 245–259 | Cite as

Feedback control of an achiral robotic microswimmer

  • U. Kei Cheang
  • Hoyeon Kim
  • Dejan Milutinović
  • Jongeun Choi
  • Min Jun KimEmail author
Article

Abstract

Magnetic microswimmers are useful for navigating and performing tasks at small scales. To demonstrate effective control over such microswimmers, we implemented feedback control of the three-bead achiral microswimmers in both simulation and experiment. The achiral microswimmers with the ability to swim in bulk fluid are controlled wirelessly using magnetic fields generated from electromagnetic coils. The achirality of the microswimmers introduces unknown handedness resulting in un-certainty in swimming direction. We use a combination of rotating and static magnetic fields generated from an approximate Helmholtz coil system to overcome such uncertainty. There are also movement uncertainties due to environmental factors such as unsteady flow conditions. A kinematic model based feedback controller was created based on data fitting of experimental data. However, the controller was unable to yield satisfactory performance due to uncertainties from environmental factors; i.e., the time to reach target pose under adverse flow condition is too long. Following the implementation of an integral controller to control the microswimmers’ swimming velocity, the microswimmers were able to reach the target in roughly half the time. Through simulation and experiments, we show that the feedback control law can move an achiral microswimmer from any initial conditions to a target pose.

Keyword

microrobotics magnetic control low Reynold number chirality feedback control 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Ferreira A, Agnus J, Chaillet N, Breguet J-M. A smart mi-crorobot on chip: Design, identification, and control. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2004, 9, 508–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Zhang H, Hutmacher DW, Chollet F, Poo A N, Burdet E. Microrobotics and MEMS-based fabrication techniques for scaffold-based tissue engineering. Macromolecular Bioscience, 2005, 5, 477–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Dogangil G, Ergeneman O, Abbott J J, Pané S, Hall H, Muntwyler S, Nelson B J. Toward targeted retinal drug de-livery with wireless magnetic microrobots. IEEE Interna-tional Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Nice, France, 2008, 1921–1926.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Fusco S, Chatzipirpiridis G, Sivaraman K M, Ergeneman O, Nelson B J, Pané S. Chitosan electrodeposition for micro-robotic drug delivery. Advanced Healthcare Materials, 2013, 2, 1037–1044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Kim S, Qiu F, Kim S, Ghanbari A, Moon C, Zhang L, Nelson B J, Choi H. Fabrication and characterization of magnetic microrobots for three-dimensional cell culture and targeted transportation. Advanced Materials, 2013, 25, 5829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Liu X, Kim K, Zhang Y, Sun Y. Nanonewton force sensing and control in microrobotic cell manipulation. International Journal of Robotics Research, 2009, 28, 1065–1076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Martel S, Mathieu J-B, Felfoul O, Chanu A, Aboussouan E, Tamaz S, Pouponneau P, Yahia L, Beaudoin G, Soulez G. Automatic navigation of an untethered device in the artery of a living animal using a conventional clinical magnetic resonance imaging system. Applied Physics Letters, 2007, 90, 114105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Grady M S, Howard M A III, Molloy J A, Ritter R C, Quate E G, Gillies G T. Nonlinear magnetic stereotaxis: Three-dimensional, in vivo remote magnetic manipulation of a small object in canine brain. Medical Physics, 1990, 17, 405–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Mathieu J-B, Beaudoin G, Martel S. Method of propulsion of a ferromagnetic core in the cardiovascular system through magnetic gradients generated by an MRI system. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 2006, 53, 292–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Abbott J, Peyer K, Lagomarsino M, Zhang L, Dong L, Kaliakatsos I, Nelson B. How should microrobots swim? The International Journal of Robotics Research, 2009, 28, 1434–1447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Ogrin F Y, Petrov P G, Winlove C P. Ferromagnetic mi-croswimmers. Physical Review Letters, 2008, 100, 218102.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Yesin K B, Exner P, Vollmers K, Nelson B J. Design and control of in-vivo magnetic microrobots. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, 2005, 3749, 819–826.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Avron J E, Kenneth O, Oaknin D H. Pushmepullyou: An efficient micro-swimmer. New Journal of Physics, 2005, 7, 234–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Najafi A, Golestanian R. Simple swimmer at low Reynolds number: Three linked spheres. Physical Review E, 2004, 69, 062901.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Clearfield A. Current opinion in solid state & materials science. Current Science, 1996, 1, 268.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Singh R, Lillard J W Jr. Nanoparticle-based targeted drug delivery. Experimental and Molecular Pathology, 2009, 86, 215–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Tan M L, Choong P F, Dass C R. Recent developments in liposomes, microparticles and nanoparticles for protein and peptide drug delivery. Peptides, 2010, 31, 184–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Bae Y H, Park K. Targeted drug delivery to tumors: Myths, reality and possibility. Journal of Controlled Release, 2011, 153, 198–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Cheang U K, Kim M J. Self-assembly of robotic micro- and nanoswimmers using magnetic nanoparticles. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 2015, 17, 145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Ghosh A, Paria D, Rangarajan G, Ghosh A. Velocity fluc-tuations in helical propulsion: How small can a propeller be. Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 2013, 5, 62–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Sun C, Lee J S, Zhang M. Magnetic nanoparticles in MR imaging and drug delivery. Advanced Drug Delivery Re-views, 2008, 60, 1252–1265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Dobson, J. Magnetic nanoparticles for drug delivery. Drug Development Research, 2006, 67, 55–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Purcell E M. Life at low Reynolds number. American Journal of Physics, 1977, 45, 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Zhang L, Abbott J J, Dong L, Kratochvil B E, Bell D, Nelson B J. Artificial bacterial flagella: Fabrication and magnetic control. Applied Physics Letters, 2009, 94, 064107.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    Zhang L, Ruh E, Grützmacher D, Dong L, Bell D J, Nelson B J, Schönenberger C. Anomalous coiling of SiGe/Si and SiGe/Si/Cr helical nanobelts. Nano Letters, 2006, 6, 1311–1317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    Tottori S, Zhang L, Qiu F, Krawczyk KK, Franco-Obregón A, Nelson B J. Magnetic helical micromachines: Fabrication, controlled swimming, and cargo transport. Advanced Materials, 2012, 24, 811–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Ghosh A, Fischer P. Controlled propulsion of artificial magnetic nanostructured propellers. Nano Letters, 2009, 9, 2243–2245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    Cheang U K, Roy D, Lee J H, Kim M J. Fabrication and magnetic control of bacteria-inspired robotic microswim-mers. Applied Physics Letters, 2010, 97, 213704Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    Temel F Z, Yesilyurt S. Magnetically actuated micro swimming of bio-inspired robots in mini channels. IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics (ICM), Istanbul, Turkey, 2011, 342–347.Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    Gao W, Feng X, Pei A, Kane C R, Tam R, Hennessy C, Wang J. Bioinspired helical microswimmers based on vas-cular plants. Nano Letters, 2013, 14, 305–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    Dreyfus R, Baudry J, Roper M L, Fermigier M, Stone H A. Microscopic artificial swimmers. Nature, 2005, 437, 862–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    Gao W, Kagan D, Pak O S, Clawson C, Campuzano S, Chuluun-Erdene E, Shipton E, Fullerton E E, Zhang L, Lauga E, Wang J. Cargo — towing fuel — free magnetic nanoswimmers for targeted drug delivery. Small, 2012, 8, 460–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    Steager E B, Sakar M S, Kumar V, Pappas G J, Kim M J. Electrokinetic and optical control of bacterial microrobots. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 2011, 21, 035001.Google Scholar
  34. [34]
    Kim D H, Cheang U K, Kohidai L, Byun D, Kim M J. Artificial magnetotactic motion control of Tetrahymena pyriformis using ferromagnetic nanoparticles: A tool for fabrication of microbiorobots. Applied Physics Letters, 2010, 97, 173702.Google Scholar
  35. [35]
    Leoni M, Kotar J, Bassetti B, Cicuta P, Lagomarsino M C. A basic swimmer at low Reynolds number. Soft Matter, 2009, 5, 472–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    Manesh K B, Cardona M, Yuan R, Clark M, Kagan D, Balasubramanian S, Wang J. Template-assisted fabrication of salt-independent catalytic tubular microengines. ACS Nano, 2010, 4, 1799–1804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    Gao W, D’Agostino M, Garcia-Gradilla V, Orozco J, Wang J. Multi-ful driven janus micromotors. Small, 2013, 9, 467–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    Hong Y, Blackman N M, Kopp N D, Sen A, Velegol D. Chemotaxis of nonbiological colloidal rods. Physical Re-view Letters, 2007, 99, 178103.Google Scholar
  39. [39]
    Mori N, Kuribayashi K, Takeuchi S. Artificial flagellates: Analysis of advancing motions of biflagellate micro-objects. Applied Physics Letters, 2010, 96, 083701.Google Scholar
  40. [40]
    Volpe G, Buttinoni I, Vogt D, Kümmerer H-J, Bechinger C. Microswimmers in patterned environments. Soft Matter, 2011, 7, 8810–8815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. [41]
    Cheang U K, Milutinovic D, Choi J, Kim M J. Towards model-based control of achiral microswimmers. ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Conference, TX, USA, 2014.Google Scholar
  42. [42]
    Cheang U K, Meshkati F, Kim D, Kim M J, Fu H C. Minimal geometric requirements for micropropulsion via magnetic rotation. Physical Review E, 2014, 90, 033007.Google Scholar
  43. [43]
    Cheang U K, Kim H, Milutinovic D, Choi J, Rogowski L, Kim M J. Feedback control of three-bead achiral robotic microswimmers. IEEE International Conference on Ubiquitous Robots and Ambient Intelligence (URAI), 2015, 518–523.Google Scholar
  44. [44]
    Happel J, Brenner H. Low Reynolds Number Hydrodynamics: with Special Applications to Particulate Media, Springer, 1965.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  45. [45]
    Atherton T J, Kerbyson D J. Size invariant circle detection. Image and Vision Computing, 1999, 17, 795–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. [46]
    Sun Y, Duthaler S, Nelson B J. Autofocusing in computer microscopy: Selecting the optimal focus algorithm. Mi-croscopy Research and Technique, 2004, 65, 139–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. [47]
    Griffiths D J. Introduction to Electrodynamics, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1999.Google Scholar
  48. [48]
    Cheang U K, Lee K, Julius A A, Kim M J. Multiple-robot drug delivery strategy through coordinated teams of microswimmers. Applied Physics Letters, 2014, 105, 083705.Google Scholar
  49. [49]
    Aicardi M, Casalino G, Bicchi A, Balestrino A. Closed loop steering of unicycle like vehicles via Lyapunov techniques. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 1995, 2, 27–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. [50]
    Kim P S S, Becker A, Ou Y, Julius A A, Kim M J. Imparting magnetic dipole heterogeneity to internalized iron oxide nanoparticles for microorganism swarm control. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 2015, 17, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. [51]
    Slotine J J E, Li W. Applied Nonlinear Control, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1991.zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Jilin University 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • U. Kei Cheang
    • 1
  • Hoyeon Kim
    • 2
  • Dejan Milutinović
    • 3
  • Jongeun Choi
    • 4
  • Min Jun Kim
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Engineering and MechanicsDrexel UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringSouthern Methodist UniversityDallasUSA
  3. 3.Department of Computer EngineeringUniversity of CaliforniaCaliforniaUSA
  4. 4.School of Mechanical EngineeringYonsei UniversitySeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations