Abstract
In the acute setting, patients with periappendiceal masses generally improve with broad-spectrum antibiotics with or without percutaneous catheter drainage, but whether or not to perform an interval appendectomy remains controversial. We have analyzed our experience over the past decade, comparing results from interval laparoscopic appendectomy (ILA) and interval open appendectomy (IOA). Medical records were reviewed for 56 patients who initially presented with the diagnosis of periappendiceal mass or abscess and who subsequently underwent interval appendectomy. Data were accumulated for both the initial hospitalization and interval appendectomy. Comparisons were made between period 1 (1987 to 1993) and period 2 (1994 to 1997). Follow-up data were obtained via telephone conversations with the patients. Patient characteristics with regard to age, sex, and comorbidities did not differ between the ILA and IOA groups. The number of patients undergoing CAT scan increased from 33% to 55%, whereas the initial hospital stay decreased from 7.42 to 4.61 days (P <0.001). The percentage of interval appendectomies performed by the laparoscopic method increased from 30% to 85%. The total operating room time did not differ (95 vs. 103 minutes), but die hospital stay was much shorter in the ILA group (0.55 vs. 3.07 days, P <0.001). There were no instances of intra-abdominal or wound infections in either group. In the later time period the mean hospital stay decreased to 0.38 days, with 59% of the operations performed on an outpatient basis. Following ILA, narcotic pain medication was used for an average of 1.3 days and the reported "time to return to full activities" was 2.5 days. ILA is a simple and safe procedure that can usually be performed on an outpatient basis. Given the minimal morbidity of the procedure, we believe that ILA should be considered for most patients who initially present with periappendiceal masses.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Nitecki S, Assalia A, Schein M. Contemporary management of the appendiceal mass. Br J Surg 1993;80:18-l9.
Ein S, Schandling B. Is interval appendectomy necessary after rupture of an appendiceal mass? J Pediatr Surg 1996;31:849–850.
Vargas HI, Averbrook A, Stamos M. Appendiceal mass: Conservative therapy followed by interval laparoscopic appendectomy. Am Surg 1994;60:753–758.
Skoubo-Kristensen E, Hvid I. The appendiceal mass. Ann Surg 1982;196:584–587.
Ein SH, Shandling B. Is interval appendectomy necessary after rupture of an appendectomy mass? J Pediatr Surg 1996;31:849–850.
Barnes BA, Behringer GE, Wheelock FC, Wilkins EW. Treatment of appendicitis at the Massachusetts Genera! Hospital. JAMA 1962;180:122–126.
McCahill LE, Pellegrini CA, Wiggins T, Helton WS. A clinical outcome and cost analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Am J Surg 1996;171:533–536.
Bonanni F, Reed J, Hartzell G, Trostole D, Boorse R, Gittle-man M, Cole A. Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy. J Am Coll Surg 1994;179:273–278.
Reiertson O, Trondsen E, Bakk A, Andersen OK, Larsen S, Rosseland AR. Prospective nonrandomized study of conventional versus laparoscopic appendectomy. World J Surg 1994;18:411–416.
Richards W, Watson D, Lynch G, Reed GW, Olsen D, Spaw A, Holcomb W, Frexes-Steed M, Goldstein R, Sharp K. A review of the results of laparoscopic vs. open appendectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1993; 177:473–480.
Tate JT, Dawson JW, Chung SCS, Lau WY, Li AKC. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: Prospective randomized trial. Lancet 1993;342:633–636.
Schirmer BD, Schmieg RE, Dix J, Edge SB, Hanks JB. Laparoscopic versus traditional appendectomy for suspected appendicitis. Am J Surg 1993;165:670–674.
Heinzelmann M, Simmen HP, Cummins AS, Largiader F. Is laparoscopic appendectomy the new gold standard? Arch Surg 1995;130:782–784.
Nguyen DB, Silen W, Hodin RA. Appendectomy in the pre- and postlaparoscopic eras. J Gastrointestinal Surg 1999;3:67–73.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Supported by the Harvard Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nguyen, D.B., Sikn, W. & Hodin, R.A. Interval appendectomy in the laparoscopic era. J Gastrointest Surg 3, 189–193 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1091-255X(99)80032-8
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1091-255X(99)80032-8