Skip to main content
Log in

Outcome analysis of long-term survivors following pancreaticoduodenectomy

  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

The long-term sequelae of pancreaticoduodenectomy are not completely understood. In the present study nutritional status, pancreatic function, and subjective quality-of-life parameters were evaluated in 45 patients who had previously undergone either pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD) or standard pancreaticoduodenectomy (SPD). Quality-of-life parameters, as measured by the Short Form-36 health survey, demonstrated no significant differences between the subgroups and normal control subjects in six of the eight domains for physical and mental health. Patients who had undergone SPD were noted to have significantly lower scores for general health and vitality than either age-matched control subjects or those who had undergone PPPD. No differences in nutritional parameters or indicators of pancreatic exocrine function between the two groups were identified. An elevated hemoglobin Alc value was seen in only one patient who was not diabetic preoperatively. Our data indicate that long-term survivors of pancreaticoduodenectomy generally feel as good as their normal counterparts, although SPD may result in some health satisfaction deficits. Nutritional status and pancreatic exocrine function are not improved in patients undergoing a pylorus-preserving procedure, and postoperative pancreatic endocrine dysfunction is unusual in both groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Whipple AO. Present day surgery of the pancreas. N Engl J Med 1942;226:515–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Traverso LW, Longmire WP Jr. Preservation of the pylorus in pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1978; 146:959–962.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Graves EJ. Detailed diagnosis and procedures: National hospital discharge survey, 1991. Vital Health Stat 1994;115:130.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Crist DW, Sitzman JV, Cameron JL. Improved hospital morbidity and survival after the Whipple procedure. Ann Surg 1987;206:358–365.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Edge SE, Schmeig RE, Rosenlof LK, et al. Pancreas cancer resection outcome in American university centers in 19891990. Cancer 1993;71:3502–3508.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Peters JE, Carey LC. Historical review of panereaticoduodenectomy. AmJ Surg 1991;161:219–225.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fish JC, Smith LB, Williams RD. Digestive function after radical pancreaticoduodeneetomy. Am J Surg 1969;117:40–45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bradley EL, Isaaes J, Hersh T, et al. Nutritional consequences of total gastrectomy. Ann Surg 1975; 182:415 -429.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Edwards JP, Lyndon PJ, Smith TB, Johnston D. Fecal fat ex- cretion after truneal, selective and highly selective vagotomy for duodenal ulcer. Gut 1974;15:521–525.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Butter TJ. The effect of gastrectomy on pancreatic secretion in man. The pattern of steatorrhea following gastrectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1961;29:311.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Traverso WL, Longrnire WP Jr. Preservation of the pylorus in pancreatieoduodenectomy: A follow-up evaluation. Ann Surg 1980;192:306–310.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fink AS, DeSousa LR, Mayer EA, et al. Long-term evaluation of pylorus preservation during pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Surg 1988; 12:663–670.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. MeLeod RS, Taylor BR, O’Connor BI, et al. Quality of life, nutritional status, and gastrointestinal profile following the Whipple procedure. Am J Surg 1995;169:179–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Patel AG, Toyoma MT, Kusske AM, et al. Pylorus-preserving Whipple resection for pancreatic cancer. Is it any better? Arch Surg 1995;130:838–842.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Grant JP. Nutritional assessment by body compartment analysis. In Grant JP, ed. Handbook of Total Parenteral Nutrition, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1992, pp 15–47.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Royall D, Jeejeebhoy KN, O’Connor B, et al. Nutritional status and function in patients following Whipple procedure compared with controls. J Am Coil Nutr 1996;15:73–78.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zerbi A, Balzano G, Patuzzo R, et al. Comparison between pylorus-preserving and Whipple pancreatoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 1995;82:975–979.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported in part by a grant from the Samuel J. Roessler Research Foundation of the College of Medicine of The Ohio State Universi:.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Melvin, W.S., Buekers, K.S., Muscarella, P. et al. Outcome analysis of long-term survivors following pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2, 72–78 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1091-255X(98)80106-6

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1091-255X(98)80106-6

Keywords

Navigation