Skip to main content
Log in

Controversy and obesity surgery—What else is new?

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Peitersen E, Quaade F, Breum L, Olesen HP. Esophageal banding: Pilot study of a new operation. Surg Res Commun 1990;9: 177–182.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kral JG, Kissileff HR. Surgical approaches to the treatment of obesity. Ann Behav Med 1987;9:15–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kral JG. Surgical treatment of obesity. Med Clin North Am 1989;73:251–264.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Scopinaro N, Gianetta E, Adami GF, et al. Biliopancreatic diversion for obesity at eighteen years. Surgery 1996;119:261–268.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Liszka TG, Sugerman HJ, Kellum JM, Birkenhauer R, Starkey J. Risk/benefit considerations of distal gastric bypass. Int J Obesity 1988;12:604(A).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rand CSW, MacGregor A. Successful weight loss following surgery and the perceived liability of morbid obesity. Int J Obesity 1991;15:577–579.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Martin LF, Tan T-L, Horn J, et al. Comparison of the costs associated with medical and surgical treatment of obesity. Surgery 1995;118:599–607.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, version IV. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association.

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kral, J.G. Controversy and obesity surgery—What else is new?. J Gastrointest Surg 1, 525–526 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1091-255X(97)80068-6

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1091-255X(97)80068-6

Keywords

Navigation