Skip to main content
Log in

pH-metric analysis after successful antireflux surgery: Comparison of 24-hour pH profiles in patients undergoing floppy fundoplication or Roux-en-Y duodenal diversion

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Fundoplication is the most widely used antireflux method, whereas Roux-en-Y duodenal diversion (partial gastrectomy, vagotomy, and Roux-en-Y reconstruction) has been used in fewer patients with more complicated gastroesophageal reflux disease. Abnormal esophageal pH values are normalized after successful fundoplication. However, very little is known about possible changes in the pH profile after successful Roux-en-Y duodenal diversion. A total of 37 patients with severe gastroesophageal reflux disease were treated by fundoplication (n=22) or Roux-en-Y duodenal diversion (n=15). Postoperatively all patients in both groups were symptom free and healing of esophagitis was verified endoscopically. After fundoplication, the 24-hour esophageal acid exposure decreased significantly (P=0.03) and the pH profile normalized (pH<4 in 5.8%±2.4% of the recorded time). However, the decrease in esophageal acid exposure was not significant (P=0.77) after successful Roux-en-Y reconstruction and the pH profile remained abnormal (pH<4 in 15.1%±4.3%). It was concluded that 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring is a reliable means of assessing the results of fundoplication, but the current test criteria should be reexamined in evaluating the results of Roux-en-Y duodenal diversion. Healing of esophagitis after Roux-en-Y duodenal diversion despite abnormal acid reflux, as shown by 24-hour pH measurements, suggests that duodenal contents also have a role in the pathogenesis of esophagitis in an acid milieu.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nissen R. Eine einfache Operation zur Beeinflussung de Refluxoesophagitis. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 1956; 86:590–592.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Salo JA, Lempinen M, Kivilaakso E. Partial gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction in the treatment of persistent or recurrent oesophagitis after Nissen fundoplication. Br J Surg 1985; 72:623–625.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Spencer J. Prolonged pH recording in the study of gastrooesophageal reflux. Br J Surg 1969; 56:912–914.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Klaüser AG, Heinrich C, Schindlbeck NE, Müller-Lissner SA. Is long-term esophageal pH monitoring of clinical value? Am J Gastroenteral 1989; 84:361–366.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fuchs KH, DeMeester TR, Albertucci M. Specificity and sensitivity of objective diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Surgery 1987; 102:575–580.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schindlbeck NE, Heinrich C, König A, Dendorfer A, Pace F, Müller-Lissner SA. Optimal thresholds, sensitivity and specificity of long-term pH-metry for the detection of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gastroenterology 1987; 93:85–90.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jamieson JR, Stein HJ, DeMeester TR, Bonavina L, Schwizer W, Hinder RA, Albertucci M. Ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring: Normal values, optimal thresholds, specificity, sensitivity, and reproducibility. Am J Gastroenterol 1992; 87:1102–1111.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Johnson LF, DeMeester TR. Twenty-four-hour pH monitoring of the distal esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol 1974; 62:325–332.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bremner RM, Crookes PF, DeMeester TR, Peters JH, Stein HJ. Concentration of refluxed acid and esophageal mucosal injury. Am J Surg 1992; 164:522–527.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Salo JA, Kivilaakso E. Role of luminal H+ in the pathogenesis of experimental esophagitis. Surgery 1982; 92:61–68.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Salo JA, Kivilaakso E. Role of bile salts and trypsin in the pathogenesis of experimental alkaline esophagitis. Surgery 1983; 93:525–532.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gotley DC, Morgan AP, Cooper MJ. Bile acid concentrations in the refluxate of patients with reflux oesophagitis. Br J Surg 1988; 75:587–590.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lillemoe KD, Johnson LF, Harmon JW. Role of the components of gastroduodenal contents in experimental acid esophagitis. Surgery 1982; 92:276–284.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lillemoe KD, Johnson LF, Harmon JW. Alkaline esophagitis: A comparison of the ability of components of gastroduodenal contents of injure the rabbit esophagus. Gastroenterology 1983; 85:621–628.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pellegrini CA, DeMeester TR, Wernly JA, Johnson LF, Skinner DB. Alkaline gastroesophageal reflux. Am J Surg 1978; 135:177–184.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Stein HJ, Feussner H, Kauer W, DeMeester TR. Alkaline gastroesophageal reflux: Assessment by ambulatory esophageal aspiration and pH monitoring. Am J Surg 1994; 167:163–168.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Stein HJ, Barlow AP, DeMeester TR, Hinder RA. Complications of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Role of the lower esophageal sphincter, esophageal acid and acid/alkaline exposure, and duodenogastric reflux. Ann Surg 1992; 216:35–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Attwood SEA, DeMeester TR, Bremner CG, Barlow AP, Hinder RA. Alkaline gastroesophageal reflux: Implications in the development of complications in Barrett’s columnar-lined lower esophagus. Surgery 1989; 106:764–770.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cameron AJ, Beverly JO, Payne WS. The incidence of adenocarcinoma in columnar-lined (Barrett’s) esophagus. N Engl J Med 1985; 313:857–859.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Spechler JS, Robbins AH, Rubins HB, Vincent ME, Heeren T, Doos WG, Colton T, Schimmel EM. Ademocarcinoma and Barrett’s esophagus. An overrated risk? Gastroenterology 1984; 87:927–933.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Attwood EA, Smyrk TC, DeMeester TR, Mirvish SS, Stein HJ, Hinder RA. Duodenoesophageal reflux and the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma in rats. Surgery 1992; 111:503–510.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Pera M, Trastek VF, Carpenter HA, Fernandez PL, Cardesa A, Mohr U, Pairolero P. Influence of pancreatic and biliary reflux on the development of esophageal carcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg 1993; 55:1386–1393.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. DeMeester TR, Bonavina L, Albertucci M. Nissen fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Ann Surg 1986; 204:9–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Johnsson F, Joelsson B, Gudmundsson K, Floren C-H, Walther B. Effects of fundoplication on the antireflux mechanism. Br J Surg 1987; 74:1111–1114.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Salo JA, Nemlander A, Tuominen J, Salminen J, Rämö OJ, Färkkilä M, Kivilaakso E. pH-metric analysis after successful surgery for severe reflux esophagitis: Comparison of 24-hour pH profiles in patients operated on using floppy fundoplication or Roux-en-Y duodenal diversion. Gastroenterology 1996; 110:A1415.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Donahue PE, Samuelson S, Nyhus LM, Bombeck T. The floppy Nissen fundoplication. Arch Surg 1985; 120:663–668.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Salo JA, Ala-Kulju KV, Heikkinen LO, Kivilaakso EO. Treatment of severe peptic esophageal stricture with Roux-en-Y partial gastrectomy, vagotomy, and endoscopic dilation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1991; 101:649–653.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Marks IN, Young GO, Winter T, Louw JA, Zak J, Johnston DA, Tigler-Wybrandi NA, Bridger SA. Duration of acid inhibition after withdrawal of omeprazole treatment in DU patients in remission. S Afr Med J 1992; 82:42A.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zaninotto G, Di Mario F, Constantini M, Baffa R, Germanà B, Dal Santo PL, Rugge M, Bolzan M, Naccarato R, Ancona E. Oesophagitis and pH of refluxate: An experimental and clinical study. Br J Surg 1992; 79:161–164.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Johnson LF, Harmon JW. Experimental esophagitis in a rabbit model. Clinical relevance. J Clin Gastroenterol 1986; 8: 26–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kauer WKH, Burdiles P, Ireland AP, Clark GWP, Peters JH, Bremner GG, DeMeester TR. Does duodenal juice reflux into the esophagus of patients with complicated GERD? Evaluation of a fiberoptic sensor for bilirubin. Am J Surg 1995; 169:98–104.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Sjöberg F, Gustafsson U, Tibbling L. Alkaline oesophageal reflux —An artefact due to oxygen corrosion of antimony pH electrodes. Scand J Gastroenterol 1992; 27:1084–1088.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Cullen JJ, Kelly KA. Gastric motor physiology and pathophysiology. Surg Clin North Am 1993; 73:1145–1161.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Salminen, J.T., Salo, J.A., Tuominen, J.A. et al. pH-metric analysis after successful antireflux surgery: Comparison of 24-hour pH profiles in patients undergoing floppy fundoplication or Roux-en-Y duodenal diversion. J Gastrointest Surg 1, 494–498 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1091-255X(97)80063-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1091-255X(97)80063-7

Keywords

Navigation