Skip to main content
Log in

The bandwagon effect

  • SSAT Presidential Address
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Conclusion

Although surgery has a glorious past that includes numerous seminal contributions to the medical sciences, at times progress has been and continues to be impeded by the bandwagon effect. Although many factors contribute to this phenomenon, the major obstacle that is sometimes in the pathway to truth is ourselves. The rigor of our clinical investigation has been less than it should be and our educational templates have overemphasized memorization of facts and creating clones of ourselves rather than fostering independent critical thinking by our students.

Just as good basic science research is preceded by years of training in the laboratory, good clinical research will depend on well-prepared, educated, and meticulous clinical scientists. Recent initiatives, such as the “Clinical Trials” course sponsored by the American College of Surgeons and the Clinical Investigators Preparatory Program (CIPP) funded by the National Institutes of Health, are promising aids for the development of effective clinical scientists.

Finally, we need to continually remind ourselves of the observation that “knowledge is always tentative and can only be made incrementally more certain with increasing data or evidence.” direct our energies toward forming the basis of a more complete knowledge. It is our challenge to make certain that the evidence generated in our clinical laboratories and published in our journals is reliable and that we and surgeons of the future can temper it with critical judgment as it is applied in the optimal care of our patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Moody FG. Surgical gastroenterology: problems and solutions. Am J Surg 1983;145:2–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Webster’s Third New International Dictionary. Springfield, Massachusetts: G. and C. Merriam Company, 1981.

  3. Mehrabian A. Effects of poll reports on voter preferences. J Appl Social Psychol 1998;28:2119–2130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hong CS, Konrad KA. Bandwagon effects and two-party majority voting. J Risk Uncertainty 1998;16:165–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Noelle-Neumann E. The spiral of silence: a theory of public opinion. J Communication 1974;Spring:43–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. McQuail D. Mass Communication Theory: An Introduction. London: Sage Publications, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cohen L, Rothschild H. The bandwagons of medicine. Perspectives Biol Med 1979; Summer: 531/2-538.

  8. Steinschneider A. Prolonged apnea and the sudden infant death syndrome: Clinical and laboratory observations. Pediatrics 1972;50:646–654.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gregory G. Influence of the public on a scientific revolution: The case of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization 1990;11:248–267.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Campanario JM. On influential books and journal articles initially rejected because of negative referees’ evaluations. Sci Commun 1995;16:304–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Janis I. Groupthink. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  12. McLeod RS. Evidence-based surgery. In Norton JA, Bollinger RR, Chang A, Lowry SF, Mulvihill SJ, Pass HI, Thomson RW, eds. Surgery: Basic Science and Clinical Evidence. New York: Springer, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Box JF. RA Fisher: The Life of a Scientist. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hill AB. Suspended judgement. Memories of the British streptomycin trial in tuberculous. The first randomized clinical trial. Control Clin Trials 1990;11:77–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Goligher JC, Pulvertaft CN, Watkinson G. Controlled trial of vagotomy and gastroenterostomy, vagotomy and antrectomy and subtotal gastrectomy in elective treatment of duodenal ulcer. Br Med J 1964;1:1455–1460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Warren WD. Controlled clinical research: Opportunities and problems for the surgeon. Am J Surg 1974;127:3–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Solomon MJ, McLeod RS. Clinical studies in surgical journals: Have we improved?Dis Colon Rectum1993;36:43–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pollock AV. The rise and fall of the random controlled trial in surgery. Theor Surg 1989;4:163–170.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Solomon MJ. Lazamana A, DeVore L, McLeod RS. Randomized controlled trials in surgery. Surgery 1994;115:707–712.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Solomon MJ, McLeod RS. Should we be performing more randomized controlled trials evaluating surgical operations? Surgery1995;118:459–467.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Benson K, Hartz AJ. A comparison of observational studies and randomized, controlled trials. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1878–1886.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Concato J, Shah N, Horwitz RI. Randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1887–1892.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. www.cochrane.org

  24. Festinger L. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Chapman WC, Sawyers JL. A meta-analysis of selective versus routine nasogastric decompression after elective laparotomy. Ann Surg 221:469-478.

  26. Campbell DT. In Overman ES, ed. Methodology and Epistemology for Social Science: Selected Papers. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rikkers, L.F. The bandwagon effect. J Gastrointest Surg 6, 787–794 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1091-255X(02)00054-9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1091-255X(02)00054-9

Navigation