Abstract
Tremendous variation in patient care exists, both among medical centers and among individual surgeons, in the field of colon and rectal surgery. Clinical or critical pathways based on “best demonstrated practices” from the medical literature have led to improved outcomes for many disease entities. The objective of this study was to develop a pathway for elective colon and rectal resections, and then determine whether this led to any improvement in measurable outcomes. A critical pathway was developed for the care of patients undergoing elective colon and rectal surgery, by reviewing best demonstrated practices in the literature and then developing standardized order sheets, nursing flow sheets, and patient educational material. A patient satisfaction survey was also included in the evaluation process. After being informed of the positive results from the pilot study, surgeons were ncouraged to use the critical pathway order sheets, patient information sheets, and flow sheets for their patients undergoing elective abdominal colon or rectal surgery. Between January 1995 and October 1998, the critical pathway was used for 263 patients, whereas for 122 patients this pathway was not used. For those patients in the critical pathway group, the hospital length of stay was shorter (5.5 vs. 8.2 days, including the day of surgery, P = 0.001), the time until a regular diet was tolerated was shorter (3.5 vs. 4.4 days, P = 0.001), the percentage of patients discharged home was greater (90% vs. 82%, P = 0.038), and the average hospital charges were less ($12,672 vs. $16,665, P = 0.001). These advantages did seem to be correlated with efforts at postoperative ambulation, but were independent of the type of postoperative pain control (patient-controlled analgesia vs. epidural analgesia). Patient satisfaction in the subset surveyed was slightly better for those in the critical pathway group than in those for whom the critical pathway was not used. Elective colon and rectal surgery appears to lend itself to uniformity of postoperative order sheets and clinical expectations. Shortened lengths of hospital stay, earlier resumption of a regular diet, and diminished hospital charges were found with the use of this critical pathway, with no diminution of patients’ perceptions of satisfaction with the hospital experience.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hawasli A, Schroder D, Lloyd L, Featherstone R. Elective conventional colectomy in the era of laparoscopic surgery. Am Surg 1996;62:589–592.
Archer S, Burnett R, Fischer J, et al. Implementation of a clinical pathway decreases length of stay and hospital charges for patients undergoing total colectomy and ileal pouch/ anal anastomosis. Surgery 1997;122:699–703.
Bradshaw B, Liu S, Thirlby R. Standardized perioperative care protocols and reduced length of stay after colon surgery. J Am Coll Surg 1998;186:501–506.
Basse L, Jakobsen DH, Billesbolle P, et al. A clinical pathway to accelerate recovery after colonic resection. Ann Surg 2000;232:51–57.
Petrelli N, Stulc J, Blumenson L. Nasogastric decompression following colorectal surgery. Am Surg 1993;59:632–635.
Cheatham ML, Chapman WC, Key SP, JL S. A meta-analysis of selective versus routine nasogastric decompression after elective laparotomy. Ann Surg 1995;221:469–478.
Argov S, Goldstein I, Barzilai A. Is routine use of the nasogastric tube justified in upper abdominal surgery? Am J Surg 1980;139:849–850.
Bardram L, Funch-Jensen P, Kehlet H, et al. Recovery after laparoscopic colonic surgery with epidural analgesia, and early oral nutrition and mobilisation. Lancet 1995;345:763–764.
Binderow S, Cohen S, SD W, Nogueras J. Must early post operative oral intake be limited to laparoscopy? Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:584–589.
Reissmann P, Teoh T, Wexner S, et al. Is early oral feeding safe after elective colorectal surgery? Ann Surg 1995;222:73–77.
Choi J, O’Connell T. Safe and effective early postoperative feeding and hospital discharge after open colon resection. Am Surg 1996;62:853–856.
Bufo A, Feldman S, Daniels G, Lieberman R. Early postoperative feeding. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:1260–1265.
Moiniche S, Bulow S, Kehlet H, et al. Convalescence and hospital stay after colonic surgery with balanced analgesia, early oral feeding, and enforced mobilisation. Eur J Surg 1995;161:283–288.
Scott A. Thoracic versus lumbar epidural anesthesia’s effect on pain control and ileus resolution after restorative proctocolectomy. Surgery 1996;120:688–697.
Bredtmann R, Herden H, Tecklenburg A, et al. Epidural analgesia in colonic surgery: Results of a randomized prospective study. Br J Surg 1990;77:638–642.
Kilbride M, Senagore A, Mazier W. Epidural analgesia. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1992;174:137–140.
Liu S, Carpenter R, Mackey D, et al. Effects of perioperative analgesic technique on rate of recovery after colon surgery. Anesthesiology 1995;83;757–765.
Moss G, Regal M, Lichtig L. Reducing postoperative pain, narcotics, and length of hospitalization. Surgery 1986;99:206–09.
Cataldo P, Senagore A, Killbride M. Ketorolac and patient controlled analgesia in the treatment of postoperative pain. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1993; 176:435–438.
Collier P. Do clinical pathways for major vascular surgery improve outcomes and reduce cost? J Vasc Surg 1997;26:179–185.
Wright C, Wain J, Mathisen D, et al. Pulmonary lobectomy patient care pathway: A model to control cost and maintain quality. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;64:299–302.
Leibman B, Dillioglugil O, Scardino P, et al. Impact of a clinical pathway for radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 1998;52:94–99.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Melbert, R.B., Kimmins, M.H., Isler, J.T. et al. Use of a critical pathway for colon resections. J Gastrointest Surg 6, 745–752 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1091-255X(02)00038-0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1091-255X(02)00038-0