Skip to main content
Log in

Use of a critical pathway for colon resections

  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Tremendous variation in patient care exists, both among medical centers and among individual surgeons, in the field of colon and rectal surgery. Clinical or critical pathways based on “best demonstrated practices” from the medical literature have led to improved outcomes for many disease entities. The objective of this study was to develop a pathway for elective colon and rectal resections, and then determine whether this led to any improvement in measurable outcomes. A critical pathway was developed for the care of patients undergoing elective colon and rectal surgery, by reviewing best demonstrated practices in the literature and then developing standardized order sheets, nursing flow sheets, and patient educational material. A patient satisfaction survey was also included in the evaluation process. After being informed of the positive results from the pilot study, surgeons were ncouraged to use the critical pathway order sheets, patient information sheets, and flow sheets for their patients undergoing elective abdominal colon or rectal surgery. Between January 1995 and October 1998, the critical pathway was used for 263 patients, whereas for 122 patients this pathway was not used. For those patients in the critical pathway group, the hospital length of stay was shorter (5.5 vs. 8.2 days, including the day of surgery, P = 0.001), the time until a regular diet was tolerated was shorter (3.5 vs. 4.4 days, P = 0.001), the percentage of patients discharged home was greater (90% vs. 82%, P = 0.038), and the average hospital charges were less ($12,672 vs. $16,665, P = 0.001). These advantages did seem to be correlated with efforts at postoperative ambulation, but were independent of the type of postoperative pain control (patient-controlled analgesia vs. epidural analgesia). Patient satisfaction in the subset surveyed was slightly better for those in the critical pathway group than in those for whom the critical pathway was not used. Elective colon and rectal surgery appears to lend itself to uniformity of postoperative order sheets and clinical expectations. Shortened lengths of hospital stay, earlier resumption of a regular diet, and diminished hospital charges were found with the use of this critical pathway, with no diminution of patients’ perceptions of satisfaction with the hospital experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hawasli A, Schroder D, Lloyd L, Featherstone R. Elective conventional colectomy in the era of laparoscopic surgery. Am Surg 1996;62:589–592.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Archer S, Burnett R, Fischer J, et al. Implementation of a clinical pathway decreases length of stay and hospital charges for patients undergoing total colectomy and ileal pouch/ anal anastomosis. Surgery 1997;122:699–703.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bradshaw B, Liu S, Thirlby R. Standardized perioperative care protocols and reduced length of stay after colon surgery. J Am Coll Surg 1998;186:501–506.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Basse L, Jakobsen DH, Billesbolle P, et al. A clinical pathway to accelerate recovery after colonic resection. Ann Surg 2000;232:51–57.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Petrelli N, Stulc J, Blumenson L. Nasogastric decompression following colorectal surgery. Am Surg 1993;59:632–635.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cheatham ML, Chapman WC, Key SP, JL S. A meta-analysis of selective versus routine nasogastric decompression after elective laparotomy. Ann Surg 1995;221:469–478.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Argov S, Goldstein I, Barzilai A. Is routine use of the nasogastric tube justified in upper abdominal surgery? Am J Surg 1980;139:849–850.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bardram L, Funch-Jensen P, Kehlet H, et al. Recovery after laparoscopic colonic surgery with epidural analgesia, and early oral nutrition and mobilisation. Lancet 1995;345:763–764.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Binderow S, Cohen S, SD W, Nogueras J. Must early post operative oral intake be limited to laparoscopy? Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:584–589.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Reissmann P, Teoh T, Wexner S, et al. Is early oral feeding safe after elective colorectal surgery? Ann Surg 1995;222:73–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Choi J, O’Connell T. Safe and effective early postoperative feeding and hospital discharge after open colon resection. Am Surg 1996;62:853–856.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bufo A, Feldman S, Daniels G, Lieberman R. Early postoperative feeding. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:1260–1265.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Moiniche S, Bulow S, Kehlet H, et al. Convalescence and hospital stay after colonic surgery with balanced analgesia, early oral feeding, and enforced mobilisation. Eur J Surg 1995;161:283–288.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Scott A. Thoracic versus lumbar epidural anesthesia’s effect on pain control and ileus resolution after restorative proctocolectomy. Surgery 1996;120:688–697.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bredtmann R, Herden H, Tecklenburg A, et al. Epidural analgesia in colonic surgery: Results of a randomized prospective study. Br J Surg 1990;77:638–642.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kilbride M, Senagore A, Mazier W. Epidural analgesia. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1992;174:137–140.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu S, Carpenter R, Mackey D, et al. Effects of perioperative analgesic technique on rate of recovery after colon surgery. Anesthesiology 1995;83;757–765.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Moss G, Regal M, Lichtig L. Reducing postoperative pain, narcotics, and length of hospitalization. Surgery 1986;99:206–09.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cataldo P, Senagore A, Killbride M. Ketorolac and patient controlled analgesia in the treatment of postoperative pain. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1993; 176:435–438.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Collier P. Do clinical pathways for major vascular surgery improve outcomes and reduce cost? J Vasc Surg 1997;26:179–185.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wright C, Wain J, Mathisen D, et al. Pulmonary lobectomy patient care pathway: A model to control cost and maintain quality. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;64:299–302.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Leibman B, Dillioglugil O, Scardino P, et al. Impact of a clinical pathway for radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 1998;52:94–99.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Melbert, R.B., Kimmins, M.H., Isler, J.T. et al. Use of a critical pathway for colon resections. J Gastrointest Surg 6, 745–752 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1091-255X(02)00038-0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1091-255X(02)00038-0

Key words

Navigation