Skip to main content
Log in

Post-ERCP pancreatitis: Reduction by routine antibiotics

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Cholangitis and pancreatitis are severe complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Antibiotics have been considered important in preventing cholangitis, especially in those with jaundice. Some have suggested that bacteria may play a role in the induction of post-ERCP pancreatitis. It is not clear, however, whether the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis could be reduced by antibiotic prophylaxis, as is the case with septic complications. In this prospective study, a total of 321 consecutive patients were randomized to the following two groups: (1) a prophylaxis group (n = 161) that was given 2 g of cephtazidime intravenously 30 minutes before ERCP, and (2) a control group (n = 160) that received no antibiotics. All patients admitted to the hospital for ERCP who had not taken any antibiotics during the preceding week were included. Patients who were allergic to cephalosporins, patients with immune deficiency or any other condition requiring antibiotic prophylaxis, patients with clinical jaundice, and pregnant patients were excluded. In the final analysis six patients were excluded because of a diagnosis of bile duct obstruction but with unsuccessful biliary drainage that required immediate antibiotic treatment. The diagnosis of cholangitis was based on a rising fever, an increase in the C-reactive protein (CRP) level, and increases in leukocyte count and liver function values, which were associated with bacteremia in some. The diagnosis of acute pancreatitis was based on clinical findings, and increases in the serum amylase level (>900 IU/L), CRP level, and leukocyte count with no increase in liver chemical values. The control group had significantly more patients with post-ERCP pancreatitis (15 of 160 in the prophylaxis group vs. 4 of 155 in the control group; P = 0.009) and cholangitis (7 of 160 vs. 0 of 155; P = 0.009) compared to the prophylaxis group. Nine patients in the prophylaxis group (6%) and 15 patients in the control group (9%) had remarkably increased serum amylase levels (>900 III/L) after ERCP, but clinical signs of acute pancreatitis with leukocytosis, CRF’ reaction, and pain developed in four of nine patients in the prophylaxis group compared to 15 of 15 patients with hyperamylasemia in the control group (P = 0.003). In a multivariate analysis, the lack of antibiotic prophylaxis (odds ratio 6.63, P = 0.03) and sphincterotomy (odds ratio 5.60, P = 0.05) were independent risk factors for the development of post-ERCP pancreatitis. We conclude that antibiotic prophylaxis effectively decreases the risk of pancreatitis, in addition to cholangitis after ERCP, and can thus be routinely recommended prior to ERCP These results suggest that bacteria could play a role in the pathogenesis of post-ERCP pancreatitis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bilbao MK, Dotter CT, Lee TG, Katon RM. Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): A study of 10,000 cases. Gastroenterology 1976;70:314–320.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G, Chilovi F, Costan F, De Berardinis F, De Bernandin M, Ederle A, Fina P, Fratton A. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: A prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 1998;48:1–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Halme L, Doepel M, von Numers H, Edgren J, Ahonen J. Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP. Ann Chir Gynaecol 1999;88:127–131.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Freeman M, Nelson D, Sherman S, Haber G, Herman M, Dorsher P, Moore J, Fennerty M, Ryan M, Shaw M, Lande J, Pheley A. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 1996;335:909–918.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Motte S, Deviere J, Dumonceau JM, Serruys E, Thys JP, Cre-mer M. Risk factors for septicemia following endoscopic biliary stenting. Gastroenterology 1991;l0l:1374–1381.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brandes JW, Scheffer B, Lorenz-Meyer H, Korst HA, Littmann KP. ERCP: Complications and prophylaxis. A controlled study. Endoscopy 1981;13:27–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sauter G, Grabein B, Huber G, Mannes GA, Ruckdeschel G, Sauerbruch T. Antibiotic prophylaxis of infectious complications with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Endoscopy 1990;22:164–167.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Alveyn CG, Robertson DAF, Wright R, Lowes JA, Tillotson G. Prevention of sepsis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. J Hosp Infect 1991;19(suppl):C65-C70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Byl B, Deviere J, Struelens M, Roucloux I, Coninck A, Thys JP, Cremer M. Antibiotic nroohvlaxis for infectious comnlications after therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Clin Infect Dis 1995;20:1236–1240.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Niederau C, Pohlmann U, Lubke H, Thomas L. Prophylactic antibiotic treatment in therapeutic or complicated diagnostic ERCP: Results of a randomized controlled clinical study. Gasaointest Endosc 1994;40:533–537.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hazel S, Speelman P, Dankert J, Huibregtse K, Tytgat G, Leeuwen D. Piperacillin to prevent cholangitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. A randomized controlled study. Ann Intern Med 1996; 125:442–447.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Davis A, Kolios G, Alveyn C, Robertson D. Antibiotic prophylaxis for ERCP: A comparison of oral ciprofloxacin with intravenous cephazolin in the prophylaxis of high-risk patients. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1998;12:207–211.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cavallini G, Tittobello A, Frulloni L, Masci E, Mariani A, Di Francesco V. Gabexate for prevention of pancreatic damage related to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. N Engl J Med 1996;335:919–923.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sherman S, Lehman GA. ERCP- and endoscopic sphincterotomy-induced pancreatitis. Pancreas 1991;6:350–367.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sherman S. ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy-induced pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 1994;89:303–305.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Nordback I, Airo I. Post-ERCP acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Ann Chir Gynaecol 1988;77:15–20.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Keynes WM. The mythology of acute pancreatitis. Infect Surg 1987;6:354–358.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sand J, Airo I, Hiltunen K-M, Mattila J, Nordback I. Changes in biliary bacteria after endoscopic cholangiography and sphincterotomy. Am Surg 1992;58:324–328.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ranson JHC, Pasternack BS. Statistical methods for qualifying the severity of clinical acute pancreatitis. J Surg Res 1977; 22:79–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Cotton PB, Lehman GA, Vennes J. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: An attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 1991;37:383–393.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hamilton I, Lintott DJ, Rothwell J, Axon AT. Acute pancreatitis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Clin Radiol 1983;34:543–546.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Cunliffe WJ, Cobden I, Lavelle MI, Lendrum R, Tait NP, Venables CW. A randomized prospective study comparing two contrast media in ERCP. Endoscopy 1987;19:201–202.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Roszler MH, Campbell WL. Post-ERCP pancreatitis: Association with urographic visualization during ERCP. Radiology 1985;157:595–598.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sherman S, Ruffolo TA, Hawes RH, Lehman GA. Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy. A prospective series with emphasis on the increased risk associated with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction and nondilatated bile ducts. Gastroenterology 1991;101:1068–1075.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Chen YK, Foliente RL, Santoro MJ, Walter MH, Colle MJ. Endoscopic sphincterotomy-induced pancreatitis: Increased risk associated with non-dilated bile ducts and sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Am J Gastroenterol 1994;89:327–333.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Tarnasky P, Cunningham J, Cotton P, Hoffman B, Palesch Y, Freeman J, Curry N, Hawes R. Pancreatic sphincter hypertension increases the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Endoscopy 1997;29:252–257.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Laugier R, Bernard JP, Berthezene P, Dupuy P. Changes in pancreatic exocrine secretion with age: Pancreatic exocrine secretion does decrease in the elderly. Digestion 1991;50:202–211.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Mehta S, Pavone J, Bouchard S, Barkun S. Predictors of post-ERCP complications in patients with suspected choledo-cholithiasis. Endoscopy 1998;30:457–463.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Binmoeller RF, Harris AG, Dumas R, Grimaldi C, Delmont JP. Does the somatostadn analogue octreotide protect against ERCP-induced pancreadtis? Gut 1992;33:1129–1133.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Sand J, Nordback I. Prospective randomized trial of the effect of nifedipine on pancreatic irritation after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Digestion 1993;54:105–111.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Palma G, Catanzano C. Use of corticosteroids in the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: Results of a controlled prospective study. Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94:982–985.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Poon R, Yeung C, Lo CM, Yuen WK, Liu CL, Fan ST. Prophylactic effect of somatostatin on post-ERCP pancreatitis: A randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 1999;49:593–598.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Araida T, Frey C, Ruebner B, Carlson J, King J. Therapeutic regimens in acute experimental pancreatitis in rats: Effects of a protease inhibitor, a β-agonist, and antibiotics. Pancreas 1995;11:132–140.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Toosie A, Chang L, Renslo R, Amell T, Bongard R, Satbile BE, de Virgilio C. Early computed tomography is rarely necessary in gallstone pancreatitis. Am J Surg 1997;63:904–907.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Lin XZ, Wang SS, Tsai YT, Lee SD, Shiesh SC, Pan HB, Su CH, Lin CY. Serum amylase, isoamylase and lipase in the acute abdomen. Their diagnostic value for acute pancreatitis. J Clin Gastroenterol 1989;11:47–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isto Nordback M.D..

Additional information

Supported by The Paula Foundation, Helsinki, Finland (Dr. Nordback), and the Medical Research Fund of Tampere University Hospital (Dr. Räty).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Räty, S., Sand, J., Pulkkinen, M. et al. Post-ERCP pancreatitis: Reduction by routine antibiotics. J Gastrointest Surg 5, 339–345 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1091-255X(01)80059-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1091-255X(01)80059-7

Key words

Navigation