Skip to main content
Log in

Ruminations of an ordinary hepatic surgeon: A journey through the pitfalls of major liver resections

  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Historically, major hepatic resections have been fraught with voluminous blood losses and, at times, high mortality rates. Improvements in patient selection and operative technique over the past 20 years have resulted in marked reduction in death and complications and have given the impression that liver surgery can be relatively effortless. Contrary to this belief, the present review illustrates some of the pitfalls and dangers of major hepatectomy and may serve to alert ordinary surgeons to approach this operation with a degree of trepidation and careful planning. Over a 22-year period, 147 liver resections were performed by one surgeon for solid liver tumors (range 0 to 21/yr). Of these, 101 were major hepatectomies comprising at least three anatomic segments (63 right, 24 left, 11 extended right, and 3 extended left) and form the basis for this report. The major resections were performed for benign disease in 16 patients and malignant tumors in 85 (24 primary and 61 metastatic lesions). All but one patient were noncirrhotic. Seventeen patients were more than 70 years and 84 were less than 70 years of age. There were five postoperative deaths among these 101 patients: two intraoperative (coagulopathy after venovenous bypass in 1 and air embolus in 1), two from postoperative liver failure, and one resulting from a myocardial infarction. Three deaths were in patients older than 70 (18%), and two were in patients younger than 70 (2%) (P = 0.03). Complications developed in 20 of 96 survivors, three patients required reoperation for postoperative bleeding, and nine patients had some duration of bile leakage. In contrast, among those undergoing "minor" hepatectomies (n = 46), there were no deaths and six (13%) patients had complications. In patients undergoing major hepatectomies, estimated blood loss was 3836 ± 3346 ml. Estimated blood loss was unaffected by experience (first 50 patients vs. second 51 patients) or use of the ultrasonic surgical as pirator, but has been reduced by the use of the Harmonic scalpel (2650 ± 2706.1 ml vs. 3997 ± 3405.8 ml, P = 0.026). The use of rapid-infusion systems aided in preventing intraoperative hypotension and hypothermia. Estimated blood loss was significantly greater than with minor anterior or lateral segmentectomies (n = 24) (3836 ± 3346 ml vs. 975 ± 518.8 ml,P< 0.0001). Hospital length of stay has been shortened, primarily by the use of closed suction drainage compared to open drainage (7.5 2 ± 4 days vs. 18.8 ± 8.4 days, P < 0.0001). Major hepatectomies continue to be formidable operations with the potential for copious blood loss and intraoperative instability. Proper patient selection, anesthesia support and availability of rapid-infusion technology, and familiarity with liver anatomy are important in keeping operative mortality and postoperative morbidity at an acceptable level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Foster,JH,Berman,MM. Solid Liver Tumors. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hanks JB,Meyers WC,Filston HC,Killenberg PG,Jones RS. Surgical resection for benign and malignant liver disease. Ann Surg 1980;191:584–592.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ryan WH,Hummel BW,McClelland RN. Reduction in the morbidity and mortality of major hepatic resection: Experience with 52 patients. Am J Surg 1982;144:740–743.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ekberg H,Tranberg K-G,Andersson R,Jeppsson B,Bengmark S. Major liver resection: Perioperative course and management. Ann Surg 1986;100:1–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nadig DE,Wade TP,Fairchild RB,Virgo KS,Johnson FE. Major hepatic resection: Indications and results in a national hospital system from 1988 to 1992. Arch Surg 1997;132:115–119.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Iwatsuki S,Starzl TE. Personal experience with 411 hepatic resections. Ann Surg 1988;208:421–434.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cunningham JD,Fong Y,Shriver C,Melendez J,Marx WL,Blumgart LH. One hundred consecutive hepatic resections: Blood loss, transfusion, and operative technique. Arch Surg 1994;129:1050–1056.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Harmon KE,Ryan JA Jr,Biehl TR,Lee FT. Benefits and safety of hepatic resection for colorectal metastases. Am J Surg 1999;177:402–404.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Buell JF,Rosen S,Yoshida A,Labow D,Limsrichamrern S,Cronin DC,Bruce DS,Wen M,Michelassi F,Millis JM,Posner MC. Hepatic resection: Effective treatment for primary and secondary tumors. Surgery 2000;128:686–693.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rosen CB,Nagorney DM,Taswell HF,Helgeson SL,Ilstrup DM,van Heerden JA,Adson MA. Perioperative blood transfusion and determinants of survival after liver resection for metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Ann Surg 1992;216:493–505.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Jamieson GG, Corbel L, Campion J-P, Launois B. Major liver resection without a blood transfusion: Is it a realistic objective? Surgery 1992;112:32–36.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hodgson WJ,DelGuercio LRM. Preliminary experience in liver surgery using the ultrasonic scalpel. Surgery 1984;5:230–234.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fong Y,Brennan MF,Brown K,Heffernan N,Blumgart LH. Drainage is unnecessary after elective liver resection. AmJ Surg 1996;171:158–162.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fortner JG,Lincer RM. Hepatic resection in the elderly. Ann Surg 1990;211:141–145.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Koperna T,Kisser M,Schulz F. Hepatic resection in the elderly. WorldJ Surg 1998;22:406–412.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas S. Helling M.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Helling, T.S. Ruminations of an ordinary hepatic surgeon: A journey through the pitfalls of major liver resections. J Gastrointest Surg 6, 625–629 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1091-255X(01)00059-2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1091-255X(01)00059-2

Key words

Navigation