Skip to main content
Log in

Repair of bile duct injuries with gore-tex vascular grafts: Experimental study in dogs

  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Bile duct injury is the most feared complication related to biliary tract operations. The goal of this investigation was to offer an alternative treatment that might prevent this complication. Twelve mongrel dogs, thin-walled FEP-ringed Gore-Tex vascular grafts, and Gore-Tex sutures were used in this study. The dogs were randomized into three groups of four according to the length of time of graft implantation: group 1 = 1 month; group 2 = 2 months; and group 3 = 3 months. During the first part of the study, a biliary injury was induced by ligating the middle choledocus after performing a conventional cholecystectomy. During the second part of the study, biliodigestive and biliobiliary anastomosis were performed using Gore-Tex vascular grafts prior to resection of the stenotic area. Initially, an increase in serum bilirubin and alkaline phosphatase levels was noted. Two weeks later, after implantation of the grafts, these values returned to normal. Thin-walled FEP-ringed Gore-Tex vascular grafts were found to be useful in the repair of bile duct injuries, especially in complete transections of the common bile duct. The ductility and flexibility of the material allows any type of anastomosis to be performed, especially when bile duct-gut anastomosis is technically difficult.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Branum G, Schmitt C, Baillie J, et al.. Management of major biliary complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 1993;217:532–541.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. MacFadyen BV Jr, Vecchio R, Ricardo AE, et al.. Bile duct injuries after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: The United States experience. SurgEndosc 1998;12:315–321.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Andren-Sandberg A, Alinder G, Bengmark S. Accidental le sions of the common bile duct at cholecystectomy. Pre- and pe-rioperative factors ofimportance. Ann Surg 1985;201:328–332.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. McSherry CK. Cholecystectomy: The gold standard. Am J Surg 1989;158:174–178.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Carroll BJ, Birth M, Phillips EH. Common bile duct inju ries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy that result in ligation. SurgEndosc 1998;12:310–314.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Roslyn JJ, Binns GS, Hughes EF, et al.. Open cholecystec tomy: A contemporary analysis of 42,474 patients. Ann Surg 1993;218:129–137.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ruka M, Rowinski WA, Lipski M, et al.. Expanded polytet-rafluoroethylene grafts in restoring bile drainage in dogs. Z Exp Chir Transplant Kunstl 1987;6:317–323.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mendelowitz DS, Beal JM. Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene in reconstruction of the canine biliary system. Arch Surg 1982; 143:221–224.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lillemoe KD, Martin SA, Cameron JL, et al.. Major bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Follow-up after combined surgical and radiological management. Ann Surg 1997;225:459–471.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Regoly-Mérei J, Iház M, Szeberin Z, et al.. Biliary tract complications in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A multi-center study of 148 biliary tract injuries in 26,440 opera tions. SurgEndosc 1998;12:294–300.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Targona EM, Marco C, Balagué C, et al.. How, when, and why bile duct injury occurs: A comparison between open and lap aroscopic cholecystectomy. SurgEndosc 1998;12:322–326.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Woods MS, Traverso LW, Kozarek RA, et al.. Characteris tics of biliary tract complications of laparoscopic cholecys tectomy: A multi-institutional study. Am J Surg 1994;167:27–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Vitale GC, Stephens G, Wieman TJ, et al.. Use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the man agement of biliary complications after laparoscopic chole cystectomy. Surg 1993;114:806–814.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kozarek RA, Ball TJ, Patterson DJ, et al.. Endoscopic treat ment of biliary injury in the era of laparoscopic cholecystec tomy. Gastrointest Endosc 1994;40:10–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bergman JJGHM, van den Brink GR, Rauws EAJ, et al. Treatment of bile duct lesions after laparoscopic cholecys tectomy. Gut 1996;38:141–147.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Trerotola SO, Savader SJ, Lund GB, et al.. Biliary tract complications following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Im aging and intervention. Radiology 1992; 184:195–2 00.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. van Sonnenberg E, D’Agosino HB, Easter DW, et al.. Com plications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Coordinated radiologic and surgical management in 21 patients. Radiology 1993;188:394–404.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Néstor A. Gómez M.D., F.A.C.S., F.A.C.G..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gómez, N.A., Alvarez, L.R., Mite, A. et al. Repair of bile duct injuries with gore-tex vascular grafts: Experimental study in dogs. J Gastrointest Surg 6, 116–120 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1091-255X(01)00038-5

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1091-255X(01)00038-5

Key words

Navigation