Skip to main content
Log in

A Prospective Study of Insulin Sensitivity and Glucose Metabolism in Women Using a Continuous Subdermal Levonorgestrel Implant System

  • Published:
The Journal of the Society for Gynecologic Investigation: JSGI Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Decreased insulin sensitivity and deterioration in oral glucose tolerance curves have been reported with oral contraceptive use, particularly with those containing levonorgestrel. However, the subdermal levonorgestrel systems release a lower dosage of steroid and avoid the first pass through the liver that occurs with oral administration. We hypothesized, therefore, that continuous subdermal levonorgestrel has no significant effect on insulin sensitivity and other indices of glucose metabolism.

Methods

Nine women desiring a subdermal hormonal contraceptive system were recruited for this longitudinal prospective study. Each subject underwent a 3-hour frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test immediately before insertion and after 6 months of continuous use. Insulin sensitivity and glucose effectiveness were determined using a mathematical minimal modeling approach. Glucose clearance and fasting and peak levels of glucose and insulin were examined as well. The matched-pair data were analyzed using paired t tests.

Results

There was no significant change in insulin sensitivity, glucose effectiveness, glucose clearance, or fasting or peak insulin levels. Fasting glucose levels remained within a normal range.

Conclusions

Subdermal levonorgestrel appears to have no significant effect on tissue insulin sensitivity or glucose metabolism after 6 months of continuous use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Waine H, Frieden EH, Caplan HZ, et al. Metabolic effects of Enovid on rheumatoid patients. Arthritis Rheum 1963;6:796.

  2. Spellacy WN, Buhi WC, Birk SA. The effect of estrogens on carbohydrate metabolism: Glucose, insulin and growth hormone studies on one hundred and seventy-one women ingesting Pre-marin, mestranol, and ethinyl estradiol for six months. Am ] Obstet Gynecol 1972;114:378–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kalkoff RK. Effects of oral contraceptive agents on carbohydrate metabolism. J Steroid Biochem 1975;6:949–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Spellacy WN, Buhi WC, Birk SA. The effects of norgestrel on carbohydrate and lipid metabolism over one year. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1976;125:984–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Spellacy WN, Buhi WC, Birk SA. Carbohydrate metabolism prospectively studied in women using a low-estrogen oral contraceptive for six months. Contraception 1979;20:137–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wynn V, Adams PW, Godsland I, et al. Comparison of effects of different combined oral-contraceptive formulations on carbohydrate and lipid metabolism. Lancet 1979;i:1045–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Spellacy WN, Buhi WC, Birk SA. Prospective studies of carbohydrate metabolism in “normal” women using norgestrel for eighteen months. Fertil Stenl 1981;35:167–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Spellacy WN. Carbohydrate metabolism during treatment with estrogen, progestogen, and low-dose oral contraceptives. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982;142:732–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Spellacy WN, Buhi WC, Birk SA. The effects of two yean of mestranol treatment on carbohydrate metabolism. Metabolism 1982;31:1006–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Briggs MH, Briggs M. Randomized prospective studies on meta-bolic effects of oral contraceptives. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl 1982;105:25–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kung AWC, Ma JTC, Wong VCW, et al. Glucose and lipid metabolism with triphasic oral contraceptives in women with history of gestational diabetes. Contraception 1987;35:257–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Spellacy WN, Ellingson AB, Kotlik A, Tsibris JCM. Plasma glucose and insulin levels in women using a levonorgestrel-containing triphasic oral contraceptive for three months. Contraception 1988;38:27–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Godsland IF, Crook D, Simpson R, et al. The effects of different formulations of oral contraceptive agents on lipid and carbohydrate metabolism. N Engl J Med 1990;323:1375–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Srivastava MC, Oakley NW, Tompkins CV, Sonksen PH, Wynn V. Insulin metabolisrfl, insulin sensitivity and hormonal responses to insulin infusion in patients taking oral contraceptive steroids. Eur J Clin Invest 1975;5:425–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kasdorf G, Kalkhoff RK. Prospective studies of insulin sensitivity in normal women receiving oral contraceptive agents. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1988;66:846–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Godsland IF, Walton C, Felton C, Proudler S, Patel A, Wynn V. Insulin resistance, secretion, and metabolism in users of oral contraceptives. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1991;74:64–70.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Olsson SE, Odlind V, Johansson EDB, Nordstrom ML. Plasma levels of levonorgestrel and free levonorgestrel index in women using Norplant implants or two covered rods (Norplant-2). Contraception 1987;35:215–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Shoupe D, Mischell DR. Norplant: Subdermal implant system for long-term contraception. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;160:1286–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Yang YJ, Youn JH, Bergman RN. Modified protocols improve insulin sensitivity estimation using the minimal model. Am ] Physiol 1987;253:E595–602.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bergman RN, Phillips LS, Cobelle C. Physiologic evaluation of factors controlling glucose tolerance in man. Measurement of insulin sensitivity and beta-cell glucose sensitivity from the response to intravenous glucose. J Clin Invest 1981;68:1456–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bergman RN, Finegood DT, Ader M. Assessment of insulin sensitivity in vivo. Endocr Rev 1985;6:45–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Beard JC, Bergman RN, Ward WK, Porte D Jr. The insulin sensitivity index in nondiabetic man. Correlation between clamp-derived and IVGTT-denved values. Diabetes 1986;35: 362–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pacini G, Bergman RN. Minmod: A computer program to calculate insulin sensitivity and pancreatic responsivity from the frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 1986;23:113–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Konje JC, Otolorin EO, Ladipo OA. The effect of continuous subdermal levonorgestrel (Norplant) on carbohydrate metabolism. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;166:15–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Bergman RN, Prager R, Volund A, Olefsky JM. Equival ence or the insulin sensitivity index in man derived by the minimal model method and the euglvcemic glucose clamp. J Clin Invest 1987;79:790–800.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Shamma FN, Rosse G, HajHassan L, et al. The effect of Norplant on glucose metabolism under hyperglycemic conditions. Fertil Stenl 1995;63:767–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harper, M.A., Meis, P.J. & Steele, L. A Prospective Study of Insulin Sensitivity and Glucose Metabolism in Women Using a Continuous Subdermal Levonorgestrel Implant System. Reprod. Sci. 4, 86–89 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1071-5576(97)00002-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1071-5576(97)00002-6

Navigation