Abstract
Background
The feasibility of determining left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) from 99mTc-labeled sestamibi gated tomography (GSPECT) is well established. To improve precision of measurement, rules used by observers in processing tomograms were encoded for automation.
Methods and Results
LV centers were estimated from activity centroids of time-difference images exceeding 50% of maximum counts. End diastole and end systole were defined by time-varying maximum count extremes. Endocardial borders were generated by fitting maximum locations with fifth-order two-dimensional harmonics, searching inward to predetermined thresholds, and reconciling endocardial with valve plane points. Regression analysis of GSPECT EF yilded r=0.87 versus equilibrium gated blood pool in 75 patients and r-0.87 versus gated first pass in 65 patients. GSPECT EF interobserver variability was r=0.92 and intraobserver automatic, versus manual linear correlation was r=0.94. A subgroup of 25 studies was analyzed by six independent observers, for whom EF agreement with the core laboratory ranged from r=0.93 to r=0.96. Experienced observers judged it necessary to alter end-diastolic or end-systolic frames in 7% of patients, endocardial borders in 14%, and LV centers in 28%.
Conclusion
Results of automated GSPECT LV EF correlated well with those of manual GSPECT and gated first-pass and equilibrium blood pool values and were highly reproducible.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ladenheim ML, Pollock BH, Rozanski A, et al. Extent and severity of myocardial hypoperfusion as predictors of prognosis in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1986;7:464–71.
Shah PK, Maddahi J, Staniloff HM, et al. Variable spectrum and prognostic implications of left and right ventricular ejection fractions in patients with and without clinical heart failure after acute myocardial infarction. Lancet 1988;6:255–65.
Maddahi J, Garcia EV, Berman DS, et al. Improved noninvasive assessment of coronary artery disease by quantitative analysis of regional stress myocardial distribution and washout of Tl-201. Circulation 1981;64:924–35.
Schelbert HR, Verba JW, Johnson AD, et al. Nontraumatic determination of left ventricular ejection fraction by radionuclide angiocardiography. Circulation 1975;51:902–9.
Garcia E, Cooke CD, Van Train KF, et al. Technical aspects of myocardial SPECT imaging with technetium-99m sestamibi. Am J Cardiol 1990;66:23E-32E.
DePuey EG, Nichols K, Dobrinsky C. Left ventricular ejection fraction assessed from gated technetium-99m-sestamibi SPECT. J Nucl Med 1993;34:1871–6.
DePuey EG, Nichols KJ, Slowikowski JS, et al. Fast stress and rest acquisitions for technetium-99m-sestamibi separate-day SPECT. J Nucl Med 1995;36:569–74.
Van Train KF, Areeda J, Garcia EV, et al. Quantitative same-day rest-stress technetium-99m sestamibi SPECT: definition and validation of stress normal limits and criteria for abnormality. J Nucl Med 1993;34:1494–502.
Hoffman EJ, Huang SC, Phelps ME. Quantitation in positron emission computed tomography, I: effects of object size. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1979;5:391–400.
Cooke CD, Garcia EV, Cullom SJ, Faber TL, Pettigrew RI. Determining the accuracy of calculating systolic wall thickening using a fast Fourier transform approximation: a simulation study based on canine and patient data. J Nucl Med 1994;35:1185–92.
Reiber JHC, Lie SP, Simoons ML, et al. Clinical validation of fully automated computation of ejection fraction from gated tomographic equilibrium blood-pool scintigrams. J Nucl Med 1983;24:1099–107.
Christian PE, Nortmaan CA, Taylor A. Comparison of fully automated and manual ejection fraction calculations: validation and pitfalls. J Nucl Med 1985;26:775–82.
Nichols K, DePuey EG, Gooneratne N, Salensky H, Friedman M, Cochoff S. First pass ventricular ejection fraction using a single crystal nuclear camera. J Nucl Med 1994;35:1292–300.
Vansant JP, Faber TL, Folks RD, Rao JM, Garcia EV. Resting left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction from gated SPECT: correlation to first pass [abstract]. Circulation 1995;92:I-11.
Germano G, Kiat H, Kavanaugh PB, et al. Automatic quantification of ejection fraction from gated myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Med 1995;36:2138–47.
Nichols K, DePuey EG, Salensky H, Rozanski A. Reproducibility of ejection fractions from stress versus rest gated perfusion SPECT [abstract]. J. Nucl Med 1996;37:115P.
Williams KA, Taillon LA. Five methods for evaluation of left ventricular function with Tc-99m-sestamibi: a comparison with contrast ventriculography [abstract]. J. Nucl Med 1996;37:104P.
Gradel C, Staib LH, Heller EN, et al. Limitations of ECG-gated SPECT for assessment of regional thickening: experimental comparison with ECG-gated MRI [abstract]. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;27:241A.
Nichols K, DePuey EG, Salensky H, Rozanski A. Image enhancement of severely hypoperfused myocardia for computation of tomographic ejection fraction [abstract]. J. Nucl Med 1996;37:105P.
Ficato EP, Fessler JA, Shreve PD, et al. Simultaneous transmission/emission myocardial perfusion tomography: diagnostic accuracy of attenuation-corrected 99mTc-sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography. Circulation 1996;93:463–73.
Lange K, Carson R. EM reconstruction algorithms for emission and transmission tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1984;8:306–16.
Gullberg GT, Gengsheng LZ. A cone-beam filtered backprojection reconstruction algorithm for cardiac single photon emission computed tomography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1992;11:91–101.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Supported in part by a research grant from General Electric Medical Systems, Milwaukee, Wis.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nichols, K., DePuey, E.G. & Rozanski, A. Automation of gated tomographic left ventricular ejection fraction. J Nucl Cardiol 3, 475–482 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1071-3581(96)90057-4
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1071-3581(96)90057-4