Skip to main content
Log in

Theoretical Approach to Change Blast Furnace Regime With Natural Gas Injection

  • Published:
Journal of Iron and Steel Research International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The operation of blast furnace using natural gas and oxygen enriched blast (composite blast technology) is considered in many countries to be standard operation for a modern blast furnace particularly in certain countries with cheap and stable supply of natural gas. The theoretical flame temperature (TFT) of combustion and the degree of direct reduction of iron oxides (rd) are considered as the main controlling parameters of composite blast technology. The calculated values of these parameters are mainly dependent on the amount of air blast consumption. This amount of air blast is measured before entering into blast stoves. Actually, some of air blast is lost through valves of airstoves. Consequently, the real volume of air blast in the furnace is less than the recorded value by amounts of 5%–15% which is not considered in the estimation of rd and TFT. The purpose is to analyze the different methods for estimation of air blast inside the blast furnaces and develop a theoretical mode to calculate air blast consumption with high accuracy. Based on the calculation of air blast consumption, a complete roadmap is demonstrated to change the operation regime parameters of blast furnaces working on composite blast technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chatterjee A. Beyond the Blast Furnace [M]. Florida: CRC Press Inc. 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Peacey J, Devenport W G. The Iron Blast Furnace, Theory and Practice [M]. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Von Bogdandy L, Engel H J. The Reduction of Iron Ores: Scientific Basis and Technology [M]. Berlin: Springer-Verlag Berlin and Heidelberg GmbH and Co, 1971.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Wright J K, Taylor I F, Philp D K. A Review of Progress of the Development of New ronmaking Technologies [J]. Minerals Engineering, 1991, 4(7–11):983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fruehan R J. Future Iron and Steelmaking in the USA [J]. Scandinavian Journal of Metalurgy, 1999, 28(2):77.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bababich A, Yaroshevskii S, Formos A, et al. Conjection of Noncoking Coal and Natural Gas in Blast Furnace [J]. TSIJ International, 1999, 39(3): 229.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Abdel Halim K S, Andronov V N, Nasr M I. Blast Furnace Operation With Natural Gas Injection and Minimum Theoretical FlameTemperature [J]. Ironmaking and Steelmaking, 2009, 36(1): 12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Andronov V N. Modern Blast Furnace [M]. Saint Petersburg: Library of Saint Petersburg State Technical University, 2001 (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Andronov V N. The Influence of Different Factors on the Possible Minimum Coke Consumption in the Blast Furnace [M]. Saint Petersburg: Library of Saint Petersburg State Technical University, 2001 (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nekrasov Z T. Blast Furnace Practice [M]. Moscow: Domennoe Proizvodstvo, Metallurgiya (MChM. Sb. 2), 1975 (in Russia).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tovarovskii I G, Merkulov A E. Blast-Furnace Smelting With the Injection of Natural Gas and Coke-Oven Gas [J]. Steel in Translation, 2011, 41(6): 499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tovarovskii I G. Effectiveness Evaluation of the Use of Natural Gas in Blast Furnaces [J]. Metallurgist, 1968, 12(10): 515 (in Russian).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yusfin Yu S, Koroleva V L, Chernousov P I. Calculation of Theoretical Combustion Temperature and Its Relation With Blast Furnace Operation Parameters [J]. Steel in Translation, 1988, 18(3): 97.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Andronov V N, Babich A I, Yaroshevkii, et al. Size Grading of Coal Dust Fuel for Blast Furnaces [J]. Steel in Translation, 1988, 18(5): 197.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yusfin Yu C, Koroleva V L, Myshlyaev L P. Analysis of Technological Factors Influence on Theoretical Combustion Temperature [J]. Steel in Translation, 1991, 12(2): 7.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gustavsson J, Andresson M, Jonsson P. Effect of Selected Model Parameters on Predicted RAFT Data [J]. Scandinavian Journal of Metalurgy, 2002, 31(5): 328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Abdel Halim K S. Optimization of Operation Parameters for Blast Furnaces at EISCO [D]. Saint Petersburg: Saint Petersburg Technical State University, 2001 (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bahgat M, Abdel Halim K S, El-Kelesh H A, et al. Blast Furnace Operating Conditions Manipulation for Reducing Coke Consumption and CO2 Emission [J]. Steel Research Int, 2012, 83(7): 686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gruner M L. Studies of Blast Furnace Phenomena [M]. London: Henery S King and Co, 1873.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kamenev R D, Boklan B V, Lyalyuk V P, et al. Degree of Direct Reduction of Iron and Overall Heat Balance When Using Combined Blast [J]. Steel in Translation, 1989, 19(1): 7.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kamenev R D, Sukonnik M A. Constant Basicity of the Agglomerate [J]. Metallurgist, 1962, 6(12): 527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. S. Abdel Halim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Halim, K.S.A. Theoretical Approach to Change Blast Furnace Regime With Natural Gas Injection. J. Iron Steel Res. Int. 20, 40–46 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1006-706X(13)60154-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1006-706X(13)60154-5

Key words

Navigation