Skip to main content
Log in

Life Cycle Assessment of Internal Recycling Options of Steel Slag in Chinese Iron and Steel Industry

  • Published:
Journal of Iron and Steel Research International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The internal recycling process of BOF slag which is one of the huge solid wastes from iron and steel industry was emphasized. Based on the four scenarios of different internal recycling strategies for BOF slag, life cycle assessment (LCA) as a valuable tool for industrial solid waste management was applied to analyze the contribution to reducing environmental impacts and resources burdens for each scenario. The global warming potential (GWP) results of the four scenarios show that the scenario which performs best in carbon reduction cuts off 14.2% of GWP impacts of the worst scenario. The results of this study show that the optimized internal recycling process of BOF slag can improve the environmental performance of crude steel. It is important to assess and choose an appropriate strategy to recycle BOF slag from LCA perspective to reduce the environmental impacts and resource burdens as much as possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Steel Association. Crude Steel Statistics 2009 [EB/OL]. Brussels: World Steel Association, 2010 [2010-02-19]. https://doi.org/www.worldsteel.org/.

    Google Scholar 

  2. National Bureau of Statistics, Ministry of Environmental Protection. China Statistical Yearbook on Environment [M]. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2009 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  3. China Iron and Steel Association. China Steel Yearbook 2009 [M]. Beijing: The Editorial Board of China Steel Yearbook, 2009 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bjrklund A, Finnveden G. Recycling Revisited—Life Cycle Comparisons of Global Warming Impact and Total Energy Use of Waste Management Strategies [J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2005, 44(4): 309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 14040 International Standard. Environmental Management-Life Cycle Assessment-Principles and Framework [S]. Geneva: International Organisation for Standardization, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Finnveden G, Hauschild M Z, Ekvall T. Recent Developments in Life Cycle Assessment [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2009, 91(1): 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Finnveden G, Ekvall T. Life-Cycle Assessment as a Decision-Support Tool—The Case of Recycling Versus Incineration of Paper [J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 1998, 24(3/4): 235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. McDougall R F, White R P, Franke M, et al. Integrated Solid Waste Management; A Life Cycle Inventory [M]. Oxford; Blackwell Science, 2001.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Arena U, Mastellone ML, Perugini F. The Environmental Performance of Alternative Solid Waste Management Options: A Life Cycle Assessment Study [J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2003, 96(1/2/3): 207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Moberg Å, Finnveden G, Johansson J, et al. Life Cycle Assessment of Energy From Solid Waste—Part 2: Landfilling Compared to Other Treatment Methods [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2005, 13(3): 231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Banar M, Cokaygil Z, Ozkan A. Life Cycle Assessment of Solid Waste Management Options for Eskisehir, Turkey [J]. Waste Management, 2009, 29(1): 54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chubbs S T, Steiner B A. Life Cycle Assessment in the Steel Industry [J]. Environmental Progress, 1998, 17(2): 92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. World Steel Association. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) [EB/OL]. Brussels: World Steel Association, 2009 [2009-10-03]. https://doi.org/www.worldsteel.org/.

    Google Scholar 

  14. WANG Li-hong. Methodology and Application in Recycling Waste of Iron and Steel Industry [D]. Kunming; Yunnan Normal University, 2005 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  15. SUN Jing. Analysis and Combined Utilization of Solid Waste and Relevant Measures for Prevention of Pollution in Baotou Iron and Steel Company [D]. Xi an: Xi an University of Architecture and Technology, 2006 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  16. WANG Lin, SUN Ben-liang, LI Cheng-wei. The Treatment and Comprehensive Utilization of Steel Slag [J]. Energy for Metallurgical Industry, 2007, 26(4): 54 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  17. SONG Jia-qiang. Fundamental Study on Recycling Use of Steel Slag [D]. Xi’an: Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, 2007 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  18. LI Wen-xiang. Blast Granulation Technology for BOF Slag [J]. Anhui Metallurgy, 2009, 2(3): 43 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Forster P, Ramaswamy V, Paulo A, et al. Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing [M], Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bo Chen.

Additional information

Foundation Item: Item Sponsored by Environmental Protection Public Welfare Scientific Research Project of China (200809025); National Basic Research Program of China (2005CB724206)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, B., Yang, Jx. & Ouyang, Zy. Life Cycle Assessment of Internal Recycling Options of Steel Slag in Chinese Iron and Steel Industry. J. Iron Steel Res. Int. 18, 33–40 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1006-706X(11)60087-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1006-706X(11)60087-3

Keywords

Navigation