Skip to main content
Log in

Mechanism of air-trapped vertical vortices in long-corridor-shaped surge tank of hydropower station and their elimination

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of Hydrodynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The air-trapped vertical vortices (ATVVs) are easy to form above the throttled orifices in the widely used long-corridor-shaped surge tanks (LCSSTs), when the tank water level decreases rapidly during hydraulic transients. These ATVVs may jeopardize the operation safety of the hydropower stations and should be avoided. This study elucidates the formation mechanism of the ATVVs and proposes some simple measures to eliminate them. The 3-D CFD model for predicting the ATVVs is validated first by physical model tests in a model tailrace LCSST, and then the formation mechanism is analyzed based on the numerical results. It is shown that the main influence factor for the ATVVs is the critical submergence, which can be reduced by minimizing the velocity circulation around the throttled orifices. Two practical ATVV elimination measures through suppressing the velocity circulation are compared and verified, and the optimized one is recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Odgaard A. J. Free-surface air core vortex [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, 1986, 112(7): 610–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Li H. F., Chen H. X., Ma Z. et al. Experimental and numerical investigation of free-surface vortex [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2008, 20(4): 485–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nevzat Y., Fikret K. Critical submergence for intakes in open channel flow [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, 1995, 121(12): 900–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nevzat Y., Abdul S. E., Kerem T. Critical submergence for dual rectangular intakes [J]. Journal of Energy Engineering, 2012, 138(4): 237–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen Y. L., Wu C., Ye M. et al. Hydraulic characteristics of vertical vortex at hydraulic intakes [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2007, 19(2): 143–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang Y. K., Jiang G., Liang D. F. Investigation of air-core vortex at hydraulic intakes [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2010, 22(2): 673–678.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wang Y. K., Jiang C. B., Liang D. F. Comparison between empirical formulae of intake vortices [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 2011, 49(1): 113–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Li S. B. Research on the influencing factors of vortex at hydraulic intakes [D]. Doctoral Thesis, Tianjin, China: Tianjin University, 2009 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wu J., Yang J. D. Three-dimensional flow field analysis of erect swirl in strip-shaped and restricted-orifice surge chamber [J]. Water Resources and Power, 2008, (4): 105–107, 168 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Deng S. Y., Cheng Y. G. Flow characteristics of long corridor-shaped surge tank and elimination of the air-entraining vertical vortices: CFD simulation and analysis [J]. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 2009, 28(4): 131–142 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chen Y., Wu C., Wang B. et al. Three-dimensional numerical simulation of vertical vortex at hydraulic intake [J]. Procedia Engineering, 2012, 28: 55–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Okamura S., Tomoyoshi T., Kamemoto T. et al. CFD simulation of flow in model pump sumps for detection of vortices [C]. 8th Asian International Fluid Machinery Conference. Yichang, China, 2005, 12–15.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cai F., Cheng Y. G., Zhang X. X. Approaches to guarantee accurate 3D CFD simulations of surge tank wave [J]. Engineering Journal of Wuhan University, 2016, 49(3): 390–396 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Xia L. S., Cheng Y. G., Zhou D. Q. 3-D simulation of transient flow patterns in a corridor-shaped air-cushion surge chamber based on computational fluid dynamics [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2013, 25(2): 249–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. ANSYS FLUENT 14.0 theory guide [M]. Canonsburg, PA, USA: ANSYS Inc., 2011.

  16. Tang X. L., Wang F. J., Li Y. J. et al. Numerical investigations of vortex flows and vortex suppression schemes in a large pumping-station sump [J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 2011, 225(6): 1459–1480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Keshavarzi G., Guan H. Y., Barber T. Comparison of the VOF and CLSVOF methods in interface capturing of a rising bubble [J]. Journal of Computational Multiphase Flows, 2013, 5(1): 43–56.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen Z. N., Wu C., Chen Y. G. et al. Experiment study of vertical vortex at hydraulic intakes [J]. Journal of Southwest University for Nationalities (Natural Science Edition), 2006, 32(4): 799–804 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong-guang Cheng  (程永光).

Additional information

Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51579187).

Biography: Fang Cai (1990-), Female, Master

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cai, F., Cheng, Yg., Xia, Ls. et al. Mechanism of air-trapped vertical vortices in long-corridor-shaped surge tank of hydropower station and their elimination. J Hydrodyn 29, 845–853 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6058(16)60796-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6058(16)60796-5

Key words

Navigation