Skip to main content
Log in

Dual state-parameter optimal estimation of one-dimensional open channel model using ensemble Kalman filter

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of Hydrodynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, both state variables and parameters of one-dimensional open channel model are estimated using a framework of the Ensemble Kalman Filter (EnKF). Compared with observation, the predicted accuracy of water level and discharge are improved while the parameters of the model are identified simultaneously. With the principles of the EnKF, a state-space description of the Saint-Venant equation is constructed by perturbing the measurements with Gaussian error distribution. At the same time, the roughness, one of the key parameters in one-dimensional open channel, is also considered as a state variable to identify its value dynamically. The updated state variables and the parameters are then used as the initial values of the next time step to continue the assimilation process. The usefulness and the capability of the dual EnKF are demonstrated in the lower Yellow River during the water-sediment regulation in 2009. In the optimization process, the errors between the prediction and the observation are analyzed, and the rationale of inverse roughness is discussed. It is believed that (1) the flexible approach of the dual EnKF can improve the accuracy of predicting water level and discharge, (2) it provides a probabilistic way to identify the model error which is feasible to implement but hard to handle in other filter systems, and (3) it is practicable for river engineering and management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. SCHUMM S. A. River variability and complexity[M]. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2005, 4–8.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. TANG Hong-wu, XIN Xiao-kang and DAI Wen-hong et al. Parameter identification for modeling river network using a genetic algorithm[J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2010, 22(2): 246–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. De DONCKER L., TROCH P. and VERHOEVEN R. et al. Determination of the Manning roughness coefficient influenced by vegetation in the river Aa and Biebrza river[J]. Environmental Fluid Mechanics, 2009, 9(5): 549–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. BAO Wei-min, ZHANG Xiao-qin and QU Si-min. Dynamic correction of roughness in the hydrodynamic model[J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2009, 21(2): 255–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. FORZIERI G., DEGETTO M. and RIGHETTI M. et al. Satellite multispectral data for improved floodplain roughness modeling[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2011, 407(1-4): 41–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. ARICÒ C., NASELLO C. and TUCCIARELLI T. Using unsteady-state water level data to estimate channel roughness and discharge hydrograph[J]. Advances in Water Resources, 2009, 32(8): 1223–1240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. KIM J., WARNOCK A. and IVANOV V. Y. et al. Coupled modeling of hydrologic and hydrodynamic processes including overland and channel flow[J]. Advances in Water Resources, 2012, 37(3): 104–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. JOWETT I. G., DUNCAN M. J. Effectiveness of 1D and 2D hydraulic models for instream habitat analysis in a braided river[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2012, 48(11): 92–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. XU S., HUANG W. Estimating extreme water levels with long-term data by GEV distribution at Wusong Station near Shanghai City in Yangtze Estuary[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2011, 38(2): 468–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. WU Xiao-ling, WANG Chuan-hai and CHEN Xi et al. Kalman filtering correction in real-time forecasting with hydrodynamic model[J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2008, 20(3): 391–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. RAOL J. R., GIRIJA G. and SINGH J. Modelling and parameter estimation of dynamic systems[M]. London, UK: The Institution of Engineering and Technology, 2004, 1–2.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. LI Da-yong, DONG Zeng-chuan and LIU Ling et al. Real-time alternative updating model coupling 1-D unsteady flow computation with Kalman filter[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2007, 38(3): 330–336 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  13. MORADKHANI H., SOROOSHIAN S. and GUPTA H. V. et al. Dual state-parameter estimation of hydrological models using ensemble Kalman filter[J]. Advances in Water Resources, 2005, 28(2): 135–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. LU H., YU Z. and ZHU Y. et al. Dual state-parameter estimation of root zone soil moisture by optimal parameter estimation and extended Kalman filter data assimilation[ J]. Advances in Water Resources, 2011, 34(3): 395–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Project supported by the National Basic Research and Development Program of China (973 Program, Grant No. 2011CB403306), the Ministry of Water Resources’ Special Funds for Scientific Research on Public Causes (Grant No. 200901023), and the Central Scientific Institutes Foundation for Public Service (Grant No. HKY-JBYW-2012-5).

Biography: LAI Rui-xun (1981-), Male, Ph. D. Candidate Senior Engineer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lai, Rx., Fang, Hw., He, Gj. et al. Dual state-parameter optimal estimation of one-dimensional open channel model using ensemble Kalman filter. J Hydrodyn 25, 564–571 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6058(11)60397-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6058(11)60397-2

Key words

Navigation