Skip to main content
Log in

Hydraulic Characteristics of Plug Energy Dissipater in Flood Discharge Tunnel

  • Published:
Journal of Hydrodynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The hydraulic characteristics of three types of plugs, namely, the single plug, the stepped plug and the gradually contracted plug were studied by means of experimental and numerical simulations. Main research findings are as follows. For the single plug, the pressure recovery lengths inside and after the plug range from 0.63–1.05 times and 2.02–2.84 times of the tunnel diameter, respectively. For the stepped plug, the lengths are 0.24–0.32 times and 1.62–2.84 times of the tunnel diameter, respectively. The best ratio of the inlet diameter to the outlet diameter of the gradually contracted plug can be expressed by a linear function. The relationship between the head loss coefficient and the area contraction ratio is obtained. The incipient cavitation numbers of different plugs are experimentally and numerically determined, and the incipient cavitation numbers are expressed by a formula. Model experiment with scale of 1:50 was carried out on a pressure tunnel with three-stage gradually contracted plugs. The results show that this type of energy dissipater is suitable for spill tunnels of high head (nearly 200 m) and large flow rate (nearly 2500 m3/s).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. SAMUEL O. RUSSELL, JAMES W. Ball. Suddenenlargement energy dissipator for Mica dam[J]. Journal of the Hydraulics Division, ASCE, 1967, 93(7): 41–56.

    Google Scholar 

  2. LIN Xiu-shan, SHEN Feng-sheng. Research and practice of multi-stage orifice spill tunnel[M]. Beijing: China Water Power Press, 2003(in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  3. GAN Guo-hui, RIFFAT Saffa B. Pressure loss characteristics orifice and perforated plates experimental[J]. Thermal and Fluid Science, 1997, 14(2): 160–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. HE Yi-ying, YANG Fan. Application of plug energy dissipater to elimination of bubbles in cooling water occurred to the outlet of power plants[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2008, 39(8): 976–981(in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  5. CHEN Ing Youn, TSENG Chih-Yung and LIN Yur-Tsai et al. Two-phase flow pressure change subject to sudden contraction in small rectangular channels[J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2009, 35(1): 297–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. LI Zhuo, YU Jian and MA Chong-fan. Local resistances of single-phase flow across abrupt expansion and contraction in small channels[J]. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering, 2007, 58(5): 1127–1131(in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  7. DAI Hui-chao, XU Wei-lin and GAO Ji-zhang et al. Application and improvement of turbulent model in high dam hydraulics[J]. Water Resources and Power, 2007, 25(4): 54–57(in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  8. TAMURA Y., MATSUMOTO Y. Improvement of bubble model for cavitation flow simulations[J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2009, 21(1): 41–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. YANG Zhi ming. Disscussion and new checking of scale effects for cavitation incepition[J]. Chinese Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2008, 23(5): 580–584(in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  10. AKIHIRO Kubota, HIROHARU Kato and HAJIME Yamaguch. A new modeling of cavitating flows: A numerical study of unsteady cavitation on a hydrofoil section[J]. J. Fluid Mech., 1992, 240: 59–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. LIU Shan-jun, YANG Yong-quan and XU Wei-lin. Hydraulic characteristics of throat-type energy dissipater in discharge tunnels[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2002, (7): 46–52(in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  12. DONG Jian-wei, XU Wei-lin and DENG Jun et al. Numerical simulation of turbulent flow through throattype energy dissipators[J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, Ser. B, 2002, 14(3): 135–138.

    Google Scholar 

  13. XIA Qing-fu, NI Han-gen. Numerical simulation of plug dissipater[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2003, (8): 37–42(in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  14. YIN Ze-gao, SHI Bing and ZHAO Lin et al. Numerical simulation of plug energy dissipater flow[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2008, 19(1): 89–93(in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  15. TIAN Zhong. Hydraulic characteristics of stepped plug dissipater in flood discharge tunnel[C]. Proceeding of IAHR Congress. Seoul, 2005, 1445–1446.

    Google Scholar 

  16. RAMAMURTHI K., NANDAKUMAR K. Characteristics of flow through small sharp-edged cylindrical orifices[J]. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 1999, 10(3): 133–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. FOSSA M., GUGLIELMINI G. Pressure drop and void fraction profiles during horizontal flow through thin and thick orifices[J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2002, 26(5): 513–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhong Tian.

Additional information

Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 50809043), the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program, Grant No.2007CB714105) and the science foundation of Education Ministry of China (Grant No. 2008108111).

Biography: TIAN Zhong (1977-), Male, Ph. D., Lecturer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tian, Z., Xu, WL., Wang, W. et al. Hydraulic Characteristics of Plug Energy Dissipater in Flood Discharge Tunnel. J Hydrodyn 21, 799–806 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6058(08)60215-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6058(08)60215-2

Key words

Navigation