Journal of Nuclear Cardiology

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 23–26 | Cite as

Analysis of serial images: A challenge and an opportunity

  • Ami E. Iskandrian
  • Ernest V. Garcia
  • Tracy Faber
Editorial Point of View


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Bateman TM. Use of nuclear techniques in the assessment of patients before and after cardiac revascularization procedures. In: Iskanrian AE, Garcia MV, eds. Nuclear cardiac imaging: principles and applications, 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Iskandrian AE, Heo J, Mehta D, Tauxe EL, Yester M, Hall MB, et al. Gated SPECT perfusion imaging for the simultaneous assessment of myocardial perfusion and ventricular function in the BARI 2D Trial: an initial report from the nuclear core laboratory. J Nucl Cardiol 2006;13:83–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Douglas P, Chen J, Gilliam L, Hendel R, Jollis J, Iskandrian AE, et al. Achieving quality in cardiovascular imaging: proceedings from the American College of Cardiology-Duke University Medical Center Think Tank on Quality in Cardiovascular Imaging J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:2141–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Golub RJ, Ahlberg AW, McClellan JR, Herman SD, Travin MI, Mather FJ, et al. Interpretative reproducibility of stress Tc-99m sestamibi tomographic myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 1999;6:257–69.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Okada RD, Boucher CA, Kirshenbaum HK, Kushner FG, Strauss HW, Block PC, et al. Improved diagnostic accuracy of thallium-201 stress test using multiple observers and criteria derived from interobserver analysis of variance. Am J Cardiol 1980;46:619–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Atwood JE, Jensen D, Frolicher V, Witztum K, Gerber K, Gilpin E, et al. Agreement in human interpretation of analog thallium myocardial perfusion images. Circulation 1981;64:601–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wackers FJ, Bodenheimer M, Fleiss JL, Brown M. Factors affecting uniformity in interpretation of planar thallium-201 imaging in a multicenter trial. J. Am Coll Cardiol 1993;21:1064–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hendel RC, Packer M, Wackers FJ, Rigo P, Lahiri A, Zaret BL, Reduced variability of interpretation and improved image quality with a technetium-99m myocardial perfusion agent: comparison of thallium-201 and Tc-99m labeled tetrofosmin. J Nucl Cardiol 1994;1:509–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Burkoff D, Jones JW, Becker LC. Variability of myocardial perfusion defects assessed by thallium-201 scintigraphy in patients with coronary artery disease not amenable to angioplasty or bypass surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;381033–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mahmarian JJ, Moye LA, Verani MS, Bloom MF, Pratt CM. High reproducibility of myocardial perfusion defects in patients undergoing serial exercise thallium-201 tomography. Am J Cardiol 1995;75:1116–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Alzaraki NP, Krawezynska EG, DePuey EG, Ziffer JA, Vansant JP, Pettigrew RI, et al. Reproducibility of thallium-201 exercise SPECT studies. J Nucl Med 1994;35:123–44.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Prigent FM, Berman DS, Elashoff J, Rozanski A, Maddahi J, Friedman J, et al. Reproducibility of stress redistribution thallium-201 SPECT quantitative indexes of hypoperfused myocardium secondary to coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1992; 70:1255–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Johansen A, Gaster AL, Veje A, Thayssen P, Haghfelt T, Holland-Carlsen PF, et al. Interpretive intra- and interobserver reproducibility of rest/stress Tc-99m sestamibi myocardial perfusion SPECT in a consecutive group of male patients with angina pectoris before and after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. Nucl Med Commun 2001;22:531–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Johansen A, Hemming HC, Christensen HW, Grupe P, Veje A, Vach W, et al. Observer variability in the evaluation of dualisotope thallium-201/Tc-99m sestamibi rest/stress myocardial perfusion SPECT in men and women with known or suspected stable angina pectoris. J Nucl Cardiol 2004;11:710–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Danias PG, Ahlberg AW, Travin MI, Mahr NC, Abreu JE, Marini D, et al. Visual assessment of left ventricular perfusion and function with electrocardiography-gated SPECT has high intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility among experienced nuclear cardiologists and cardiology trainees. J Nucl Cardiol 2002; 9:263–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Iskandrian AE, Bateman TM, Belardinelli L, Blackburn B, Cerqueira MD, Hendel RC, et al. Adenosine versus regadenoson comparative evaluation in myocardial perfusion imaging results of the ADVANCE Phase 3 Multi-Center International Trial. J Nucl Cardiol 2007;14:645–58.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Faber TL, Modersitzki J, Folks RD, Garcia EV. Detecting changes in serial myocardial perfusion SPECT: a stimulation study. J Nucl Cardiol 2005;12:302–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Slomka PJ, Nishina H, Berman DS, Akincioglu C, Abidov A, Friedman JD, et al. Automated quantification of myocardial perfusion SPECT using simplified normal limits. J Nucl Cardiol 2005;12:66–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Slomka PJ, Fish MB, Lorenzo S, Nishina H, Gerlach J, Berman DS, et al. Simplified normal limits and automated quantitative assessment for attenuation-corrected myocardial perfusion SPECT J Nucl Cardiol 2006;13:642–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bontemps L, Nazzi M, Gabain M, Jegaden O, Felecan R, Iui R. Theoretical model for myocardial functional characterization application to a group of patients evaluated before and after surgical revascularization. J Nucl Cardiol 1998;5:134–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mahmarian JJ, Dakik HA, Filipchuk NG, Shaw LJ, Iskander SS, Ruddy TD, et al. An initial strategy of intensive medical therapy is comparable to that of coronary revascularization for suppression of scintigraphic ischemia in high-risk but stable survivors of acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:2458–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Society of Nuclear Cardiology 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ami E. Iskandrian
    • 1
  • Ernest V. Garcia
    • 2
  • Tracy Faber
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of MedicineUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamBirmingham
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyEmory UniversityAtlanta

Personalised recommendations