Corridor4DM: The Michigan method for quantitative nuclear cardiology
- 208 Downloads
Quantitative software for the analysis and review of myocardial perfusion emission computed tomography images is an indispensable tool in the nuclear physician’s evaluation of patients with known or suspected heart disease. The Corridor4DM (4DM) application (formerly known as 4DM-SPECT), developed at the University of Michigan Medical Center, is a quantitative software application providing automated processing, analysis, and reporting of myocardial perfusion and function from cardiac emission computed tomography studies in a tightly integrated, user-centered environment. With health care placing increased emphasis on higher quality and efficiency in diagnostic imaging, quantitative analysis and review software applications need to provide a comprehensive environment supporting correlative review of multimodality images, integrated report generation, and remote review capabilities. The current and future design capabilities of the 4DM software application are discussed with respect to the changing landscape of imaging, where cardiac computed tomography, positron emission tomography, structured reporting, and remote review are expanding the base requirement specifications for quantitative software.
KeywordsQuantitative Software Myocar Dial Yocardial Perfusion Jection Fraction Perfusion Emission Compute Tomography Image
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Kritzman JN, Ficaro EP, Liu Y, et al. Evaluation of 3D-MSPECT for quantification of Te-99m sestamibi defect size [abstract] J Nucl Med 1999;40: 181P.Google Scholar
- 3.Ficaro EP, Quaife RA, Kritzman JN, et al. Accuracy of reproducibility of 3D-MSPECT for estimating left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with severe perfusion abaormalities [abstract]. Circulation 1999;100:126.Google Scholar
- 4.Cahill JM, Chen MY, Corbett JR, et al. Validation of three-dimensional analysis method for calculation of the lv mass and ejection fraction using Tc-99m sestamibi gated-SPECT perfusion imaging: comparison between 4D-MSPECT and magnetic resonance imaging [abstract]. J Nucl Med 2003;44: 197P.Google Scholar
- 5.Cahill JM, Chen MY, Ficaro EP, et al. Validation of 4D-MSPECT analysis method for Tc-99m gated blood pool tomography: comparison of LV ejection fractions and volumes to magnetic resonance imaging [abstract]. J Nucl Cardiol 2003;10:S20.Google Scholar
- 6.Quaife RA, Ficaro EP, Corbett JR. Automated quantitation of infarct size and potential myocardial salvage following first myocardial infarctions [abstract]. J Nucl Med 2000;41: 166P.Google Scholar
- 9.Ficaro EP, Kritzman JN, Corbett JR. Effect of valve plane constraint on LV ejection fractions from gated perfusion SPECT [abstract]. J Nucl Cardiol 2003;10:S23.Google Scholar
- 12.Malm S, Sagberg E, Larsson H, et al. Choosing apical long-axis instead of two-chamber view gives more accurate biplane echocardiographic measurements of left ventricular ejection fraction: a comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2005;18:1044–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Ficaro EP, Quaife RA, Kritzman JN, et al. Validation of a new fully automatic algorithm for quantification of gated blood pool SPECT: correlations with planar gated blood pool and perfusion SPECT [abstract]. J Nucl Med 2002;43:97P.Google Scholar
- 18.Ficaro EP, Kritzman JN, Corbett JR. Development and clinical validation of normal Tc-99m sestamibi database: comparison of 3D-MSPECT to Cequal [abstract]. J Nucl Med 1999;40: 125P.Google Scholar
- 19.Coleman RE, Delbeke D, Guiberteau MJ, et al. Concurrent PET/CT with an integrated imaging system: intersociety dialogue from the Joint Working Group of the American College of Radiology, the Society of Nuclear Medicine, and the Society of Computed Body Tomography and Magnetic Resonance. J Nucl Med 2005;46:1225–39.PubMedGoogle Scholar