Advertisement

Journal of Nuclear Cardiology

, Volume 13, Issue 4, pp 445–449 | Cite as

Noninvasive modalities for the assessment of left ventricular function: All are equal but some are more equal than others

  • Tiong Keng Lim
  • Roxy Senior
Editorial

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Guidance on the use of implantable cardioverter defibrillators for arrhythmias (review of existing guidance No. 11). National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. November 2005. Available from: URL: www.nice.org.uk.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic heart failure: full text (update 2005); doi:10-1093/eurheartj/ehi205.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Broderick TM, Bourdillon PD, Ryan T, Feigenbaum H, Dillon JC, Armstrong WF. Comparison of regional and global left ventricular function by serial echocardiograms after reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1989;2:315–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Panza JA, Laurienzo JM, Curiel RV, Quyyumi AA, Cannon RO III. Transesophageal dobutamine stress echocardiography for evaluation of patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;24:1260–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Senior R, Sridhara BS, Basu S, Henley M, Handler CE, Raftery EB, et al. Comparison of radionuclide ventriculography and 2D echocardiography for the measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction following acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 1994; 15:1235–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hoffmann R, Lethen H, Marwick T, Arnese M, Fioretti P, Pingitore A, et al. Analysis of interinstitutional observer agreement in interpretation of dobutamine stress echocardiograms. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;27:330–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lim TK, Burden L, Janardhanan R, Ping C, Moon J, Pennell D, et al. Improved accuracy of low-power contrast echocardiography for the assessment of left ventricular remodeling compared with unenhanced harmonic echocardiography after acute myocardial infarction: comparison with cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2005;18:1203–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Malm S, Frigstad S, Sagberg E, Larsson H, Skjaerpe T. Accurate and reproducible measurement of left ventricular volume and ejection fraction by contrast echocardiography: a comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:1030–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hoffmann R, von Bardeleben S, ten Cate F, Borges AC, Kasprzak J, Firschke C, et al. Assessment of systolic left ventricular function: a multi-centre comparison of cineventriculography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, unenhanced and contrast-enhanced echocardiography. Eur Heart J 2005;26:607–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hoffmann R, von Bardeleben S, Kasprzak JD, Borges AC, ten Cate F, Firschke C, et al. Analysis of regional left ventricular function by cineventriculography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and unenhanced and contrast-enhanced echocardiography: a multicenter comparison of methods. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:121–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jacobs LD, Salgo IS, Goonewardena S, Weinert L, Coon P, Bardo D, et al. Rapid online quantification of left ventricular volume from real-time three-dimensional echocardiographic data. Eur Heart J 2006;27:460–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jenkins C, Bricknell K, Hanekom L, Marwick TH. Reproducibility and accuracy of echocardiographic measurements of left ventricular parameters using real-time three-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:878–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee D, Fuisz AR, Fan PH, Hsu TL, Liu CP, Chiang HT. Real-time 3-dimensional echocardiographic evaluation of left ventricular volume: correlation with magnetic resonance imaging-a validation study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2001;14:1001–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bellenger NG, Burgess MI, Ray SG, Lahiri A, Coats AJ, Cleland JG, et al. Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes in heart failure by echocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance; are they interchangeable? Eur Heart J 2000;21:1387–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chua T, Yin LC, Thiang TH, Choo TB, Ping DZ, Leng LY. Accuracy of the automated assessment of left ventricular function with gated perfusion SPECT in the presence of perfusion defects and left ventricular dysfunction: correlation with equilibrium radionuclide ventriculography and echocardiography. J Nucl Cardiol 2000;7:301–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nichols K, Lefkowitz D, Faber T, Folks R, Cooke D, Garcia EV, et al. Echocardiographic validation of gated SPECT ventricular function measurements. J Nucl Med 2000;41:1308–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yoshioka J, Hasegawa S, Yamaguchi H, Tokita N, Paul AK, Xiuli M, et al. Left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction calculated from quantitative electrocardiographic-gated 99mTc-tetrofosmin myocardial SPECT. J Nucl Med 1999;40:1693–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tadamura E, Kudoh T, Motooka M, Inubushi M, Shirakawa S, Hattori N, et al. Assessment of regional and global left ventricular function by reinjection T1-201 and rest Tc-99m sestamibi ECGgated SPECT: comparison with three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:991–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bavelaar-Croon CD, Kayser HW, van der Wall EE, de Roos A, Dibbets-Schneider P, Pauwels EK, et al. Left ventricular function: correlation of quantitative gated SPECT and MR imaging over a wide range of values. Radiology 2000;217:572–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bax JJ, Lamb H, Dibbets P, Pelikan H, Boersma E, Viergever EP, et al. Comparison of gated single-photon emission computed tomography with magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of left ventricular function in ischemic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 2000;86:1299–305.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Faber TL, Vansant JP, Pettigrew RI, Galt JR, Blais M, Chatzimavroudis G, et al. Evaluation of left ventricular endocardial volumes and ejection fractions computed from gated perfusion SPECT with magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of two methods. J Nucl Cardiol 2001;8:645–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Thorley PJ, Smith JM. Repeatability of left ventricular ejection fraction and volume measurement for 99mTc-tetrofosmin gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Nucl Med Commun 2005;26:345–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gayed I, Cid E, Boccalandero F, Podoloff D. Factors affecting left ventricular ejection fraction using automated quantitative gated SPECT. Clin Nucl Med 2003;28:290–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hachamovitch R, Berman DS, Kiat H, Cohen I, Friedman JD, Shaw LJ. Value of stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography in patients with normal resting electrocardiograms: an evaluation of incremental prognostic value and cost-effectiveness. Circulation 2002;105:823–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sharir T, Germano G, Kavanagh PB, Lai S, Cohen I, Lewin HC, et al. Incremental prognostic value of post-stress left ventricular ejection fraction and volume by gated myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography. Circulation 1999;100:1035–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sharir T, Germano G, Kang X, Lewin HC, Miranda R, Cohen I, et al. Prediction of myocardial infarction versus cardiac death by gated myocardial perfusion SPECT: risk stratification by the amount of stress-induced ischemia and the poststress ejection fraction. J Nucl Med 2001;42:831–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lum DP, Coel MN. Comparison of automatic quantification software for the measurement of ventricular volume and ejection fraction in gated myocardial perfusion SPECT. Nucl Med Commun 2003;24:259–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Utsunomiya D, Tomiguchi S, Awai K, Shiraishi S, Nakaura T, Yamashita Y. Mutidetector-row CT and quantitative gated SPECT for the assessment of left ventricular function in small hearts: the cardiac physical phantom study using a combined SPECT/CT system. Eur Radio l 2006: 1-8.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lim TK, Burden L, Janardhanan R, Dwivedi G, Ping C, Moon J, et al. Contrast echocardiography versus gated single photon emission computed tomography for the assessment of parameters of left ventricular remodeling after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2006;19:280–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ioannidis JP, Trikalinos TA, Danias PG. Electrocardiogram-gated single-photon emission computed tomography versus cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:2059–68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Chan J, Jenkins C, Khafagi F, Du L, Marwick TH. What is the optimal clinical technique for measurement of left ventricular volume after myocardial infarction? A comparative study of 3-dimensional echocardiography, single photon emission computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2006;19:192–201.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Vallejo E, Dione DP, Sinusas AJ, Wackers FJ. Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction with quantitative gated SPECT: accuracy and correlation with first-pass radionuclide angiography. J Nucl Cardiol 2000;7:461–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Semelka RC, Tomei E, Wagner S, Mayo J, Kondo C, Suzuki J, et al. Normal left ventricular dimensions and function: interstudy repro- ducibility of measurements with cine MR imaging. Radiology 1990;174(Pt 1):763–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bellenger NG, Davies LC, Francis JM, Coats AJ, Pennell DJ. Reduction in sample size for studies of remodeling in heart failure by the use of cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2000;2:271–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Salm LP, Schuijf JD, de Roos A, Lamb HJ, Vliegen HW, Jukema JW, et al. Global and regional left ventricular function assessment with 16-detector row CT: comparison with echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Eur J Echocardiogr. In press 2005, Aug 9 (Epub ahead of print).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Dirksen MS, Bax JJ, de Roos A, Jukema JW, van der Geest RJ, Geleijns K, et al. Usefulness of dynamic multislice computed tomography of left ventricular function in unstable angina pectoris and comparison with echocardiography. Am J Cardiol 2002;90:1157–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Schuijf JD, Bax JJ, Salm LP, Jukema JW, Lamb HJ, van der Wall EE, et al. Noninvasive coronary imaging and assessment of left ventricular function using 16-slice computed tomography. Am J Cardiol 2005;95:571–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Yamamuro M, Tadamura E, Kubo S, Toyoda H, Nishina T, Ohba M, et al. Cardiac functional analysis with multi-detector row CT and segmental reconstruction algorithm: comparison with echocardiography, SPECT, and MR imaging. Radiology 2005;234:381–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Grude M, Juergens KU, Wichter T, Paul M, Fallenberg EM, Muller JG, et al. Evaluation of global left ventricular myocardial function with electrocardiogram-gated multidetector computed tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 2003;38:653–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mahnken AH, Koos R, Katoh M, Spuentrup E, Busch P, Wildberger JE, et al. Sixteen-slice spiral CT versus MR imaging for the assessment of left ventricular function in acute myocardial infarction. Eur Radiol 2005;15:714–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Belge B, Coche E, Pasquet A, Vanoverschelde JL, Gerber BL. Accurate estimation of global and regional cardiac function by retrospectively gated multidetector row computed tomography: comparison with cine magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol. In press 2006.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Raman SV, Shah M, McCarthy B, Garcia A, Ferketich AK. Multi-detector row cardiac computed tomography accurately quantifies right and left ventricular size and function compared with cardiac magnetic resonance. Am Heart J 2006;151:736–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Heuschmid M, Rothfuss JK, Schroeder S, Fenchel M, Stauder N, Burgstahler C, et al. Assessment of left ventricular myocardial function using 16-slice multidetector-row computed tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography. Eur Radiol 2006;16:551–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Dewey M, Muller M, Teige F, Hamm B. Evaluation of a semiautomatic software tool for left ventricular function analysis with 16-slice computed tomography. Eur Radiol 2006;16:25–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Schlosser T, Pagonidis K, Herborn CU, Hunold P, Waltering KU, Lauenstein TC, et al. Assessment of left ventricular parameters using 16-MDCT and new software for endocardial and epicardial border delineation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:765–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Henneman, MM, Schuijf JD, Jukema JW, Holman ER, Lam HJ, de Roos A, et al. Assessment of global and regional left ventricular function and volumes with 64-slice MSCT: A comparison with 2D electrocardiography. J Nucl Cardiol 2006;13:480–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Thompson RC, Cullom SJ. Issues regarding radiation dosage of cardiac nuclear and radiography procedures. J Nucl Cardiol 2006; 13:19–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Boehm T, Alkadhi H, Roffi M, Willmann JK, Desbiolles LM, Marincek B, et al. Time-effectiveness, observer-dependence, and accuracy of measurements of left ventricular ejection fraction using 4-channel MDCT. Rofo 2004;176:529–37.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Juergens KU, Grude M, Maintz D, Fallenberg EM, Wichter T, Heindel W, et al. Multi-detector row CT of left ventricular function with dedicated analysis software versus MR imaging: initial experience. Radiology 2004;230:403–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Society of Nuclear Cardiology 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Cardiovascular MedicineNorthwick Park HospitalHarrowEngland

Personalised recommendations