Journal of Nuclear Cardiology

, Volume 12, Issue 3, pp 302–310 | Cite as

Detecting changes in serial myocardial perfusion SPECT: A simulation study

  • Tracy L. FaberEmail author
  • Jan Modersitzki
  • Russell D. Folks
  • Ernest V. Garcia



New algorithms were evaluated for their efficacy in detecting and quantifying serial changes in myocardial perfusion from single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT).

Methods and Results

We generated 72 simulations with various left ventricular positions, sizes, count rates, and perfusion defect severities using the nonuniform rational B-splines (NURBs)-based CArdiac Torso (NCAT) phantom. Images were automatically aligned by use of both full linear and rigid transformations and quantified for perfusion by use of the CEqual program. Changes within a given perfusion defect were compared by use of a Student t test before and after registration. Registration approaches were compared by use of receiver operating characteristic analysis. Changes of 5% were not detected well in single patients with or without alignment. Changes of 10% and 15% could be detected with false-positive rates of 15% and 10%, respectively, in single studies if alignment was performed before perfusion analysis. Alignment also reduced the number of studies necessary to demonstrate a significant perfusion change (P <.05) in groups of patients by about half.


Comparison of mean uptake by t values in SPECT perfusion defects can be used to detect 10% and greater differences in serial perfusion studies of single patients. Image alignment is necessary to optimize automatic detection of perfusion changes in both single patients and groups of patients.

Key Words

Single photon emission computed tomography t values myocardial perfusion 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Losordo DW, Vale PR, Symes JF, Dunnington CH, Esakof DD, Maysky M, et al. Gene therapy for myocardial angiogenesis: initial clinical results with direct myocardial injection of phVEGF165 as sole therapy for myocardial ischemia. Circulation 1998;98:2800–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Neglia D, Sambuceti G, Giorgetti A, Bartoli M, Salvadori P, Sorace O, et al. Effects of long-term treatment with verapamil on left ventricular function and myocardial blood flow in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy without overt heart failure. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 2000;36:744–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Van Belle E, Abolmaali K, Bauters C, McFadden EP, Lablanche JM, Bertrand ME. Restenosis, late vessel occlusion and left ventricular function six months after balloon angioplasty in diabetic patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;34:476–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Berman DS, Kang X, Schisterman EF, Gerlach J, Kavanagh PB, Areeda JS, et al. Serial changes on quantitative myocardial perfusion SPECT in patients undergoing revascularization or conservative therapy. J Nucl Cardiol 2001;8:428–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dakik HA, Kleiman NS, Farmer JA, He ZX, Wendt JA, Pratt CM, et al. Intensive medical therapy versus coronary angioplasty for suppression of myocardial ischemia in survivors of acute myocardial infarction: a prospective, randomized pilot study. Circulation 1998;98:2017–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lind PA, Pagnanelli R, Marks LB, Borges-Neto S, Hu C, Zhou SM, et al. Myocardial perfusion changes in patients irradiated for left-sided breast cancer and correlation with coronary artery distribution. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003;55:914–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schmitt C, Meyer C, Kosa I, Weyerbrock S, Schneider M, Zrenner B, et al. Does radiofrequency catheter ablation induce a deterioration in sympathetic innervation? A positron emission tomography study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1998;21:327–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wackers RJTh. Science, art and artifacts: how important is quantification for the practicing physician interpreting myocardial perfusion studies? J Nucl Cardiol 1994;1:s109–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Garcia EV, Van Train K, Maddahi J. Quantification of rotational thallium-201 myocardial tomography. J Nucl Med 1985; 26:17–26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Garcia EV, Cooke CD, Van Train KF, Folks R, Peifer J, DePuey EG, et al. Technical aspects of myocardial SPECT imaging with Tc-99m sestamibi. Am J Cardiol 1990;66:23E-31E.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Terry JA, Tsui BMW, Perry JR, Hendricks JL, Gullberg GT. The design of a mathematical phantom of the upper human torso for use in 3-D SPECT imaging research. In: Mikulecky DC, Clarke AM, editors. Biomedical engineering: opening new doors. New York: New York University Press; 1990. p. 185–90.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Segars WP, Lalush DS, Tsui BMW. A realistic spline-based dynamic heart phantom. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 1999;46:503–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Faber TL, Garcia EV, Lalush DS, et al. Simulating patient-specific heart shape and motion using SPECT perfusion images with the NCAT phantom. In: Mun SK, editor. Visualization, display, and image guided procedures. Bellingham, Wash: SPIE 4319. 2001. p. 22–6.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chen J, Galt JR, Valentine JD, Faber TL, Garcia EV. Modelling SPECT acquisition and processing of changing radiopharmaceutical distribution. Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press. p. 1336–70 1996.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Woods RP, Cherry SR, Mazziotta JC. Rapid automated algorithm for aligning and reslicing PET images. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1992;16:620–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Neter J, Kutner MH, Nachtsheim CJ, Wasserman W. Applied linear statistical models. Chicago: Richard D. Irwin, Inc; 1996. p. 3–94.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Germano G, Kavanagh PB, Su HT, Mazzanti M, Kiat H, Hachamovitch R, et al. Automatic reorientation of 3-dimensional transaxial myocardial perfusion SPECT images. J Nucl Med 1995;36:1107–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mullick R, Ezquerra NF. Automatic determination of left ventricular orientation from SPECT data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1995;14:88–99.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Slomka PJ, Hurwith GA, Stephenson J, Cradduck T. Automated alignment and sizing of myocardial stress and rest scans to three-dimensional normal templates using an image registration algorithm. J Nucl Med 1996;36:1115–22.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Slomka PJ, Nishina H, Berman DS, Kang X, Friedman JD, Hayes SW, et al. Automatic quantification of myocardial perfusion stress-rest change: a new measure of ischemia. J Nucl Med 2004;45:183–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Turkington TG, DeGrado TR, Hanson MW, Coleman RE. Alignment of dynamic cardiac PET images for correction of motion. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 1997;44:235–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Faber TL, Galt JR, Chen J, Tsui BMW, Garcia EV. Detecting changes in myocardial perfusion. In: Lemke HU, Vannier MW, Inamura K, Forman AG, Doi K, Reiber JHC, editors. Computerassisted radiology and surgery. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2002. p. 879–83.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    deKemp RA, Ruddy TD, Hewitt T, Dalipaj MM, Beanlands RS. Detection of serial changes in absolute myocardial perfusion with Rb-82 PET. J Nucl Med 2000;41:1426–35.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Society of Nuclear Cardiology 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tracy L. Faber
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jan Modersitzki
    • 1
  • Russell D. Folks
    • 1
  • Ernest V. Garcia
    • 1
  1. 1.Atlanta

Personalised recommendations