Value of attenuation correction on ECG-gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging related to body mass index
- 99 Downloads
Obesity is a growing problem in the United States, and attenuation artifacts are more prevalent in this patient group. This study evaluated the impact of attenuation correction in patients with a high body mass index (BMI).
Methods and Results
Three readers interpreted gated attenuation-corrected and non-attenuation-corrected rest/stress technetium 99m sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging results in 116 patients (BMI <30, n = 60; BMI ≥30, n = 56) who had coronary angiography no more than 60 days after imaging. Readers were blinded to all clinical information and as to whether myocardial perfusion imaging was attenuation-corrected or non-attenuation-corrected. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for detection of coronary artery disease of 70% or greater for attenuation-corrected versus non-attenuation-corrected single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) were 86% versus 89%, 79% versus 50%, and 84% versus 79%, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for attenuation-corrected versus non-attenu-ation-corrected SPECT for patients with BMI less than 30 were 90% versus 90%, 82% versus 64%, and 88% versus 85%, respectively. For BMI of 30 or greater, the results were 82% versus 87%, 76% versus 41%, and 80% versus 73%, respectively. There was a significant difference in specificity overall (P =.02) and for the category of BMI of 30 or greater (P =.03).
This study demonstrates that electrocardiography-gated attenuation-corrected Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging improves specificity compared with electrocardiography-gated non-attenuation-corrected SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging, especially in patients with BMI of 30 or greater.
Key WordsAttenuation correction single photon emission computed tomography body mass index
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 6.Freedman N, Schechter D, Klein M, Marciano R, Rozenman Y, Chisin R. SPECT attenuation artifacts in normal and overweight persons, insights from a retrospective comparison of Rb-82 positron emission tomography and Tl-201 SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. Clin Nucl Med 2000;25:1019–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Imaging guidelines for nuclear cardiology procedures. American Society of Nuclear Cardiology. Myocardial perfusion stress protocols. J Nucl Cardiol 1996;3:Gll-5.Google Scholar
- 19.Brown DB. The global epidemic of obesity. International Association for the Study of Obesity web site. Available from: URL: www.iotf.org. Accessed March 3, 2005.Google Scholar
- 20.Case JA, Cullom SJ, Bateman TM O’Keefe JHO, McGhie IA. Evaluation of a Bayesian transmission reconstruction algorithm: implications for attenuation collection [abstract]. J Nucl Cardiol 2000;7:Sll.Google Scholar
- 21.Cullom SJ, Case JA, Bateman TM, O’Keefe JHO, McGhie AI. Reconstruction of attenuation maps from low-count Gd-153 transmission studies using an iterative Bayesian algorithm: clinical evaluation with simultaneous Tc-99m-sestamibi SPECT [abstract]. J Nucl Med 2000;41:134P.Google Scholar
- 22.Cerqueira MD, Weisnman NJ, Dilsizian V, Jacobs AK, Kaul S, Laskey WK, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic images of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 2002;105:539–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Agresti A. Categorical data analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1990.Google Scholar
- 30.Hayes SW, De Lorenzo A, Hachamovich R, Dhar SC, Hsu P, Cohen I, et al. Prognostic implications of combined prone and supine acquisitions in patients with equivocal or abnormal supine myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Med 2003;10:1633–40.Google Scholar
- 31.Grossman GB, Garcia EV, Bateman TM, Heller GV, Johnson LL, Folks RD, et al. Quantitative Tc-99m sestamibi attenuation- correction SPECT: development and multicenter trial validation of myocardial perfusion stress gender-independent normal database in an obese population. J Nucl Med 2004;11:263–72.Google Scholar
- 33.Gallowitsch HJ, Sykora J, Mikosch P, Kresnik E, Unterweger O, Molnar M, et al. Attenuation-corrected thallium-201 single-photon emission tomography using gadolinium-153 moving line source: clinical value and the impact of attenuation correction on the extent and severity of perfusion abnormalities. Eur J Nucl Med 1998;25:220–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.Cullom SJ, Case JA, Bateman TM. Attenuation correction for cardiac SPECT: clinical and developmental challenges. J Nucl Med 2000;41:860–2.Google Scholar