Effects of agro-forestry activities, cattle-raising practices and food-related factors in badger sett location and use in Portugal
Abstract
Mediterranean landscapes in Europe are characterized by a mixed matrix of agriculture, agro-forestry or cattle-farming areas, which have influenced native communities for centuries. Recently, new changes were imposed on these agro-forestry landscapes due to novel management options that provide new challenges for wildlife. From a conservation perspective, there is an urgent need to assess what are the impacts and ecological responses of local wildlife populations to those changes. In the present study, we assessed the influence of human-caused disturbances (e.g. agroforestry practices, cattle-breeding activities and game management), together with food/water and landscape-related factors, on sett site selection by European badgers. We also tested the role of these factors, together with climatic variability, on sett use. We detected that areas further away from water sources, but close to game species feeding structures, have a higher probability of hosting a European badger sett. Moreover, sett use was promoted by low disturbance: setts with lower cattle presence and without understory removal activities were more often in use. Thus, our study shows that, in our study area, agro-forestry and cattle breeding activities constrain badger sett use, while food and water availability influence their distribution. Although badgers have been adapting to anthropogenic activities for centuries, they respond differently depending on the type and intensity of management. Thus, to ensure biodiversity persistence and sustainable human exploitation of the landscape, we need to identify trade-offs between wildlife ecological adaptations and anthropogenic agriculture, forestry and cattle production.
Keywords
Meles meles Multi-use forests Sett selection Forest management Southwestern EuropePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Barton, K., 2014. MuMIn: Multi-model Inference. R Package Version 1.10.5. https://doi.org/CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn.
- Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., Walker, S., 2014. lme4: Linear Mixed-effects Models Using Eigen and S4. R Package Version 1. 1–7. https://doi.org/CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4.
- Bivand, R., Piras, P., 2015. Comparing implementations of estimation methods for spatial econometrics, J. Stat. Softw. 63 (18), 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bugalho, M.N., Caldeira, M.C, Pereira, J.S., Aronson, J., Pausas, J.G., 2011. Mediterranean cork oak savannas require human use to sustain biodiversity and ecosystem services, Front. Ecol. Environ. 9, 278–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Burnham, K.P., Anderson, D.R., 2002. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: a Practical Information-Theoretic Approach. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
- Butler, J., Roper, T.J., 1996. Ectoparasites and sett use in European badgers, Anim. Behav. 52, 621–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cabezas-Díaz, S., Lozano, J., Virgós, E., 2009. The declines of the wild rabbit (Oryc-tolagus cuniculus) and the Iberian lynx (Lynx pardinus) in Spain: redirecting conservation efforts. In: Aronoff, J.B. (Ed.), Handbook of Nature Conservation. Nova Science Publishers, Inc., New York, pp. 283–310.Google Scholar
- Casanova, P., Memoli, A., 2001. Hunting in Spain, Ital. J. For. Mount. Environ. 56 (1), 56–67.Google Scholar
- Clark, P.J., Evans, F.C., 1954. Distance to nearest neighbour as a measure of spatial relationships in populations, Ecology 35 (4), 445–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Correia, A.M., 2001. Seasonal and interspecific evaluation of predation by mammals and birds on the introduced red swamp crayfish Procambarus clarkii (Crustacea, Cambaridae) in a freshwater marsh (Portugal), J. Zool. Lond. 255, 533–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- de Leeuw, J., Mair, P., 2009. Gifi methods for optimal scaling in R: the package homals, J. Stat. Softw. 31 (4), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Diniz, J.A.F., Bini, L.M., Hawkins, B.A., 2003. Spatial autocorrelation and red herrings in geographical ecology, Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 12, 53–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dormann, C.F., McPherson, J.M., Araújo, M.B., Bivand, R., Bolliger, J., Carl, G., Davies, R.G., Hirzel, A., Jetz, W., Kissling, W.D., Kühn, I., Ohlemüller, R., Peres-Neto, P.R., Reineking, B., Schröder, B., Schurr, F.M., Wilson, R., 2007. Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: a review. Ecography30, 609–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Goncalves, P., Alcobia, S., Simões, L, Santos-Reis, M., 2012. Effects of management options on mammal richness in a Mediterranean agro-silvo-pastoral system, Agroforest. Syst. 85, 383–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Good, T.C., Hindenlang, K., Imfeld, S., Nievergelt, B., 2001. A habitat analysis of badger (Meles meles L.) setts in a semi-natural forest, Mamm. Biol. 66, 204–214.Google Scholar
- Hammond, R.F., McGrath, G., Martin, S.W., 2001. Irish soil and land-use classifications as predictors of numbers of badgers and badger setts, Prev. Vet. Med. 51, 137–148.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Hanley, J.A., McNeil, B., 1982. The meaning and use of the area under a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve, Radiology 143, 29–36.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Herrera, CM., 1989. Frugivory and seed dispersal by carnivorous mammals, and associated fruit characteristics, in undisturbed Mediterranean habitats, Oikos 55, 250–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jaksic, F.M., Delibes, M., 1987. A comparative analysis of food-niche relationships and trophic guild structure in two assemblages of vertebrate predators differing in species richness: causes, correlations, and consequences, Oecologia 71, 461–472.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Jenkinson, S., Wheater, C.P., 1998. The influence of public access and sett visibility on badgers (Meles meles) sett disturbance and persistence, J. Zool. Lond. 246, 478–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jepsen, J.U., Madsen, A.B., Karlsson, M., Groth, D., 2005. Predicting distribution and density of European badger (Meles meles) setts in Denmark, Biodivers. Conserv. 14, 3235–3253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kowalczyk, R., Zalewski, A., Jedrzejewska, B., Jedrzejewski, W., 2003. Spatial organization and demography of badgers (Meles meles) in Bialowieza Primeval Forest, Poland, and the influence of earthworms on badger densities in Europe, Can. J. Zool. 81, 74–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kruuk, H., 1989. The Social Badger. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
- Linting, M., Meulman, J.J., Groenen, P.J.F., Van der Kooij, A.J., 2007. Nonlinear principal components analysis: introduction and application, Psychol. Meth. 12 (3), 336–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Loureiro, F., Rosalino, L.M., Macdonald, D.W., Santos-Reis, M., 2007. Use of multiple den sites by Eurasian badgers, Meles meles, in a Mediterranean habitat, Zoolog. Sci. 24, 978–985.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Muñoz-Igualada,J., Shivik,J.A., Domínguez, F.G., Lara, J., González, L.M., 2008. Evaluation of cage-traps and cable restraint devices to capture red foxes in Spain, J. Wildl. Manage. 72, 830–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Neal, E., Cheeseman, C, 1996. Badgers. T & A Poyser, Lda, London.Google Scholar
- Paradis, E., Claude, J., Strimmer, K., 2004. Analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language, Bioinformatics 20, 289–290.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pita, R., Mira, A., Moreira, F., Morgado, R., Beja, P., 2009. Influence of landscape characteristics on carnivore diversity and abundance in Mediterranean farmland, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 132, 57–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- QGIS Development Team, http://qgis.osgeo.org.Google Scholar
- R Core Team, 2014. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computin, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. https://doi.org/www.R-project.org/. Remonti, L., Balestrieri, A., Prigioni, C, 2006. Factors determining badger Meles meles sett location in agricultural ecosystems of NW Italy. Folia Zool. 55, 19–27.Google Scholar
- Revilla, E., Palomares, F., 2002. Spatial organization, group living and ecological correlates in low-density populations of Eurasian Badgers, Meles meles, J. Anim. Ecol. 71, 497–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Robin, X., Turck, N., Hainard, A., Tiberti, N., Lisacek, F., Sanchez, J.-C, Müller, M., 2011. pROC: an open-source package for R and S+to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinform. 12, 77.Google Scholar
- Roper, T.J., 1992. The structure and function of badger setts, J. Zool. Lond. 227, 691–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Roper, T.J., 2010. Badgers. HarperCollins Publishers, London.Google Scholar
- Rosalino, L.M., Macdonald, D.W., Santos-Reis, M., 2004. Spatial structure and land-cover use in a low density Mediterranean population of Eurasian badgers, Can. J. Zool. 82, 1493–1502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rosalino, L.M., Loureiro, F., Macdonald, D.W., Santos-Reis, M., 2005a. Dietary shifts of the badger (Melesmeles) in Mediterranean woodlands: an opportunistic forager with seasonal specialisms. Mamm. Biol. 70, 12–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rosalino, L.M., Macdonald, D.W., Santos-Reis, M., 2005b. Resource dispersion and badger population density in Mediterranean woodlands: is food, water or geology the limiting factor? Oikos 110, 441–452.Google Scholar
- Rosalino, L.M., Santos, M.J., Domingos, S., Rodrigues, M., Santos-Reis, M., 2005c. Population structure and body size of sympatric carnivores in a Mediterranean landscape of SW Portugal. Rev. Biol. (Lisboa) 23, 135–146.Google Scholar
- Siegel, S., 1957. Nonparametric statistics, Am. Stat. 11, 13–19.Google Scholar
- Virgós, E., 2001. Relative value of riparian woodlands in landscapes with different forest cover for medium-sized Iberian carnivores, Biodivers. Conserv. 10, 1039–1049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Virgós, E., Casanovas,J.G., 1999. Badger Meles meles sett site selection in low density Mediterranean areas of central Spain, Acta Theriol. 44, 173–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zar, J.H., 2010. Biostatistical Analysis. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.Google Scholar
- Zuur, A.F., Ieno, E.N., Smith, G.M., 2007. Analysing Ecological Data. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zuur, A.F., Ieno, E.N., Walker, N.J., Saveliev, A.A., Smith, G.M., 2009. Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar