Advertisement

Mammalian Biology

, Volume 81, Issue 1, pp 21–30 | Cite as

Large mammals in Ruaha National Park, Tanzania, dig for water when water stops flowing and water bacterial load increases

  • Claudia StommelEmail author
  • Heribert Hofer
  • Mirjam Grobbel
  • Marion L. East
Original Investigation

Abstract

As water is essential for life, animals have adaptations that increase their ability to survive during periods of water shortage. Accessing water by digging is one behavioural adaptation to water shortage used by some African mammals. Digging might also provide access to higher quality water below ground when surface water quality is poor. We investigated the digging of waterholes by wildlife in the Ruaha National Park (NP), in central Tanzania, during three dry seasons (June to November from 2011 to 2013). We monitored surface water availability and water quality at 10 sites along the Great Ruaha River (GRR) and eight non-GRR sites. We used camera-traps and direct observations to determine when and where digging to access water occurred. Elephant (Loxodonta africana), plains zebra (Equus quagga), warthog (Phacochoerus africanus) and yellow baboon (Papio cynocephalus) dug waterholes and a further four species drunk from these holes. Waterholes were dug later in the dry season along the GRR (October) than at other sites (July). The likelihood of digging and drinking from waterholes was lower along the GRR than at non-GRR sites and did not depend on the absence of surface water but increased when surface water stopped flowing. Digging of waterholes was also significantly more likely when the bacterial load in available surface water increased but was independent of salinity levels. Escherichia coli load, indicative of faecal contamination, significantly increased with total aerobic bacterial load. Our results suggest that digging is an adaptation to avoid the ingestion of poor quality surface water highly contaminated with faeces, and thereby possibly also potentially pathogenic microbes, in addition to providing access to water when surface water is absent. Our findings also highlight (1) the essential role of the GRR as the key water source for wildlife in the Ruaha NP during the dry season, and (2) that maintenance of water flow throughout the dry season is essential to prevent deterioration of water quality in the GRR.

Keywords

Great Ruaha River Wildlife Water holes Salinity Bacterial contamination 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barnes, R., 1983. Elephant behaviour in a semi-arid environment. Afr. J. Ecol. 21, 185–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bengis, R., Kock, R., Fischer, J., 2002. Infectious animal diseases: the wildlife/livestock interface. Rev. Sci. Tech. 21, 53–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bjørnstad, A., 1976. The Vegetation of Ruaha National Park, Tanzania: 1. Annotated Check-list of the Plant Species. SRI Publications, Oslo.Google Scholar
  4. Dudley, J., Criag, G., Gibson, D., Haynes, G., Klimowicz, J., 2001. Drought mortality of bush elephants in Hwange National Park, Zimbabwe. Afr. J. Ecol. 39, 187–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. East, M., Bassano, B., Ytrehus, B., 2010. The role of pathogens in the population dynamics of European ungulates. In: Putman, R.J., Apollonio, M., Anderson, R. (Ed.), Ungulate Management in Europe: Problems and Practices. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 319–348.Google Scholar
  6. Epaphras, A.M., Gereta, E., Lejora, I.A., Ole Meing’ataki, G.E., Ng’umbi, G., Kiwango, Y., Mwangomo, E., Semanini, F., Vitalis, L, Balozi, J., Mthaiko, M.G.G., 2008. Wildlife water utilization and importance of artificial waterholes during dry season at Ruaha National Park, Tanzania. Wetl. Ecol. Manag. 16, 183–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Galat-Luong, A., Galat, G., Nizinski, G., 2009. Une conséquence du réchauffement climatique: les chimpanzés filtrent leur eau de boisson. Geogr. Tech. 4, 199–204.Google Scholar
  8. Gersberg, R.M., Rose, MA, Robles-Sikisaka, R., Dhar, A.K., 2006. Quantitative detection of hepatitis A virus and enteroviruses near the United States-Mexico border and correlation with levels of fecal indicator bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72, 7438–7444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hamilton, W.J., 1985. Demographic consequences of a food and water shortage to desert chacma baboons, Papio ursinus. Int. J. Primatol. 6, 451–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hellberg, R.S., Chu, E., 2015. Effects of climate change on the persistence and dispersal of foodborne bacterial pathogens in the outdoor environment: a review. Crit. Rev. Microbiol., https://doi.org/10.3109/1040841X.2014. 972335, Early Online: 1–25.
  11. Hilbe, J.M., 2009. Logistic Regression Models. Chapman & Hall, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hilbe,J.M., 2011. Negative Binomial Regression. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Johnson, L.K., Brown, M.B., Carruthers, E.A., Ferguson, J.A., Dombek, P.E., Sadowsky, M.J., 2004. Sample size, library composition, and genotypic diversity among natural populations of Escherichia coli from different animals influence accuracy of determining sources of fecal pollution. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70, 4478–4485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Keet, D.F., Kriek, N.P.J., Penrith, M.L., Michael, A., Huchzermeyer, H., 1996. Tuberculosis in buffaloes. Onderstepoort J. Vet. Res. 63, 239–244.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Lindeque, P., Turnbull, P., 1994. Ecology and epidemiology of anthrax in the Etosha National Park, Namibia. Onderstepoort J. Vet. Res. 61, 71–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. McGrew, W.C., Marchant, L.F., Hunt, K.D., 2007. Etho-archaeology of manual laterality: well digging by wild chimpanzees. Folia Primatol. 78, 240–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mtahiko, M.G.G., Gereta, E., Kajuni, A.R., Chiombola, E.A.T., Ng’umbi, G.Z., Copolillo, P., Wolanski, E., 2006. Towards an ecohydrology-based restoration of the Usangu wetlands and the Great Ruaha River, Tanzania. Wetl. Ecol. Manag. 14, 489–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Poché, R.M., 1974. Ecology of the African elephant (Loxodonta a. africana) in Niger, West Africa. Mammalia 38, 567–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ramey, E.M., Ramey, R.R., Brown, L.M., Kelley, S.T., 2013. Desert-dwelling African elephants (Loxodonta africana) in Namibia dig wells to purify drinking water. Pachyderm 53, 66–72.Google Scholar
  20. Redfern, J.V., Grant, R., Biggs, H., Getz, W.M., 2003. Surface-water constraints on herbivore foraging in the Kruger National Park, South Africa. Ecology 84, 2092–2107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Safferman, R., Rosen, A.A., Mashni, C.I., Morris, M.E., 1967. Earthy-smelling substance from a blue-green alga. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1, 429–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tieleman, B.I., Williams, J.B., Bloomer, P., 2003. Adaptation of metabolism and evaporative water loss along an aridity gradient. Proc. R. Soc. B 270, 207–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wanke, H., Wanke, A., 2007. Water quality for game in drylands: a case study from the Khaudum National Park, Namibia. J. Arid Environ. 70, 553–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Western, D., 1975. Water availability and its influence on the structure and dynamics of a savannah large mammal community. Afr. J. Ecol. 13, 265–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Willmer, P., Stone, G., Johnston, I., 2005. Environmental Physiology of Animals, 2nd ed. Blackwell Science, Oxford.Google Scholar
  26. Withers, P.C., Cooper, C.E., 2014. Physiological regulation of evaporative water loss in endotherms: is the little red kaluta (Dasykaluta rosamondae) an exception or the rule? Proc. R. Soc. B 281, 20140149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wolanski, E., Gereta, E., 1999. Oxygen cycle in a hippo pool, Serengeti National Park, Tanzania. Afr. J. Ecol. 37, 419–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Young, W., Horth, H., Crane, R., Ogden, T., Arnott, M., 1996. Taste and odour threshold concentrations of potential potable water contaminants. Water Res. 30, 331–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Deutsche Gesellschaft für Säugetierkunde 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Claudia Stommel
    • 1
    Email author
  • Heribert Hofer
    • 1
  • Mirjam Grobbel
    • 1
    • 2
  • Marion L. East
    • 1
  1. 1.Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife ResearchBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Bundesinstitut für RisikobewertungAbteilung Biologische SicherheitBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations