Litter sizes of Daurian ground squirrels peak at intermediate body sizes
Abstract
Litter size and body size of animals may coevolve under the concomitant pressures of sexual selection, fecundity selection, and viability selection. Studies have demonstrated the positive relationship between body size and litter size, consistent with Darwin’s fecundity advantage of large body size. However, the counterbalancing selection hypothesis predicts fecundity selection would result in a positive correlation between litter size and body size initially, whereas the opposite pressure by viability selection would decrease litter size with further increasing body size beyond a threshold size. Moreover, the reproduction senescence hypothesis predicts that litter size of old, large females would decline with deteriorating body conditions. In this study, we tested the predictions of the counterbalancing selection hypothesis and the reproduction senescence hypothesis concerning the quadratic relationship between body size and litter size in Daurian ground squirrels (Spermophilus dauricus). Litter size increased initially with increasing carcass weight of females, and then decreased with further increases in carcass weight, supporting the prediction of the counterbalancing hypothesis. However, litter size was not related to body condition index of females, and body conditions improved with increasing body weight, suggesting that the reproduction senescence hypothesis alone cannot explain the observed quadratic relationship between litter size and carcass weight of female S. dauricus.
Keywords
Body condition Fecundity selection Reproduction senescence Trade-off Viability selectionPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Blanckenhorn, W.U., 2000. The evolution of body size: what keeps organisms small? Q. Rev. Biol. 75, 385–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bonnet, X., Naulleau, G., Shine, R., Lourdais, O., 2000. Reproductive versus ecological advantages to larger body size in female snakes, Vipera aspis. Oikos 89, 509–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bünger, L, Lewis, R.M., Rothschild, M.F., Blasco, A., Renne, U., Simm, G., 2005. Relationships between quantitative and reproductive fitness traits in animals. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 360, 1489–1502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dobson, F.S., Oli, M.K., 2007. Fast and slow life histories of mammals. Ecoscience 14, 292–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dugdale, H.L., Nouvellet, P., Pope, L.C., Burke, T., MacDonald, D.W., 2010. Fitness measures in selection analyses: sensitivity to the overall number of offspring produced in a lifetime. J. Evol. Biol. 23, 282–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fokidis, H.B., Risch, T.S., Glenn, T.C., 2007. Reproductive and resource benefits to large female body size in a mammal with female-biased sexual size dimorphism. Anim. Behav. 73, 479–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Huot, J., Poulle, M.L., Crête, M., 1995. Evaluation of several indices for assessment of coyote (Canis latrans) body composition. Can. J. Zool. 73, 1620–1624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jönsson, K.I., 1997. Capital and income breeding as alternative tactics of resource use in reproduction. Oikos 78, 57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Labocha, M.K., Schutz, H., Hayes, J.P., 2014. Which body condition index is best? Oikos 123, 111–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lack, D., 1948. The significance of litter size. J. Anim. Ecol. 17, 45–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Li, Z., Li, S., Zhou, F., 1998. Analysis of the population dynamics of Daurian ground squirrels in Jilin, China. Chin. J. Zool. 33, 35–37.Google Scholar
- Liu, J., Wang, T., Li, J., Shao, M., Zou, B., Wang, T., 1993. Studies on the population age structure of ground squirrel. Acta Theriol. Sin. 13, 277–282.Google Scholar
- Luo, M., Zhong, W., 1990. Observations of the ecology of Daurian ground squirrels. Chin. J. Zool. 25, 50–54.Google Scholar
- R Development Core Team, 2013. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
- Risch, T.S., Michener, G.R., Dobson, F.S., 2007. Variation in litter size: a test of hypotheses in Richardson’s ground squirrels. Ecology 88, 306–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Roff, D.A., 2002. Life History Evolution. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar
- Schulte-Hostedde, A.I., Millar, J.S., Gibbs, H.L., 2004. Sexual selection and mating patterns in a mammal with female-biased sexual size dimorphism. Behav. Ecol. 15, 351–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sharp, S.P., Clutton-Brock, T.H., 2010. Reproductive senescence in a cooperatively breeding mammal. J. Anim. Ecol. 79, 176–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Shine, R., 1988. The evolution of large body size in females: a critique of Darwin’s “fecundity advantage” model. Am. Naturalist 131, 124–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Skibiel, A.L., Speakman, J.R., Hood, W.R., 2013. Testing the predictions of energy allocation decisions in the evolution of life-history trade-offs. Funct. Ecol. 27, 1382–1391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ung, D., Féron, C., Gouat, M., Demouron, S., Gouat, P., 2014. Maternal energetic investment in a monogamous mouse. Mamm. Biol. 79, 221–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wang, G.M., Wang, Z.W., Zhou, Q.Q., Zhong, W.Q., 1999. Relationship between species richness of small mammals and primary productivity of arid and semiarid grasslands in north China. J. Arid Environ. 43, 467–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wang, G.M., Zhou, Q., Zhong, W., Wang, G., 1994. Food selection by free-ranging Daurian ground squirrels. In: Zhang, J., Wang, G.M. (Ed.), The Proceedings of the 60th Anniversary of the Chinese Zoological Association. China Science and Technology Press, Zheng Zhou, Henan, China, pp. 370–374.Google Scholar
- Wauters, L.A., Dhondt, A.A., 1995. Lifetime reproductive success and its correlates in female Eurasian red squirrels. Oikos 72, 402–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wood, S.N., 2006. Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL, USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wood, S.N., Augustin, N.H., 2002. GAMs with integrated model selection using penalized regression splines and applications to environmental modelling. Ecol. Model. 157, 157–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zar, J.H., 1999. Biostatistical Analysis, fouth ed. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.Google Scholar
- Zhong, W., Wang, G., Zhou, Q., 2007. Communal food caches and social groups of Brandt’s voles in the typical steppes of Inner Mongolia, China. J. Arid Environ. 68, 398–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar