Advertisement

Mammalian Biology

, Volume 79, Issue 1, pp 64–70 | Cite as

Social organization, survival, and dispersal of cape foxes (Vulpes chama) in South Africa

  • Jan F. KamlerEmail author
  • David W. Macdonald
Original Investigation

Abstract

We monitored 20 cape foxes (Vulpes chama) to determine the social organization, survival, and dispersal of this species on two sites in South Africa from 2005 to 2008. Cape foxes were socially monogamous and territorial, with annual home ranges of mated pairs (n = 8) overlapping 80% on average, compared to a mean overlap of 3% between foxes in adjacent ranges. At least 2 pairs remained associated for >1 breeding season, and both sexes exhibited strong site fidelity, as home ranges in consecutive years overlapped 58-98%. Members of mated pairs never foraged together, however they used the same or nearby (<100 m apart) day rests 81% of the time when pups were 0–4 months of age, but only 28% of the time during other months of the year. Dispersal was male biased, as all juvenile males (n = 6) dispersed when 9–11.5 months old, whereas 3 of 4 juvenile females remained philopatric as either breeders or non-breeding associates. At least 6 foxes bred as yearlings (3 F, 3 M), indicating cape foxes have high reproductive potential. Two adult females maintained their territories after their mates died, whereas two adult males dispersed soon after their mates died, indicating cape foxes likely have a female-based social organization. Annual survival was 0.64, and predation from larger carnivores, primarily black-backed jackals (Canis mesomelas), was responsible for 71% of mortalities. Our results provided empirical support for previous hypotheses regarding the relationship between body size and life-history patterns in Canidae, as several ecological parameters of cape foxes were similar to that of other small (<6 kg) canid species, especially Vulpes species inhabiting arid and semi-arid environments.

Keywords

Female-based social organization Home range overlap Mortality Pair bonding Sex-biased philopatry 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bester, J.L., 1982. Die gedragsekologie en bestuur van die silwervos Vulpes chama (A. Smith, 1833) met spesiale verwysing na die Oranje-Vrystaat. University of Pretoria, South Africa (Master’s Thesis).Google Scholar
  2. Cameron, C, Berteaux, D., Dufresne, F., 2011. Spatial variation in food availability predicts extrapair paternity in the arctic fox. Behav. Ecol. 22, 1364–1373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cavallini, P., 1996. Variation in the social system of the red fox. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 8, 23–342.Google Scholar
  4. Clark Jr., H.O., Murdoch, J.D., Newman, D.P., Sillero-Zubiri, C, 2009. Vulpes corsac. Mamm. Species 832, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clark Jr., H.O., Newman, D.P., Murdoch, J.D., Tseng, J., Wang, Z.H., Harris, R.B., 2008. Vulpes ferrilata. Mamm. Species 821, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cole, L.C., 1949. The measurement of interspecific association. Ecology 30, 411–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cypher, B.L., Warrick, G.D., Otten, M.R.M., O’Farrell, T.P., Berry, W.H., Harris, C.E., Kato, T.T., McCue, P.M., Scrivner, J.H., Zoellick, B.W., 2000. Population dynamics of San Joaquin kit foxes at the Naval Petroleum Reserves in California. Wildl. Monogr. 145, 1–43.Google Scholar
  8. Dobson, F.S., Jones, W.T., 1985. Multiple causes of dispersal. Am. Nat. 126, 855–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fritts, S.H., Mech, L.D., 1981. Dynamics, movements, and feeding ecology of a newly protected wolf population in northwestern Minnesota. Wildl. Monogr. 80, 1–79.Google Scholar
  10. Geffen, E., Gompper, M.E., Gittleman, J.L., Luh, H.K., Macdonald, D.W., Wayne, R.K., 1996. Size, life-history traits, and social organization in the Canidae: a reevaluation. Am. Nat. 147, 140–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Geffen, E., Macdonald, D.W., 1992. Small size and monogamy: spatial organization of Blanford’s foxes, Vulpes cana. Anim. Behav. 44, 1123–1130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Geffen, E., Mercure, A., Girman, D.J., Macdonald, D.W., Wayne, R.K., 1992. Phylogenetic relationships of the fox-like canids: mitochondrial DNA restriction fragment, site and cytochrome b sequence analyses. J. Zool. Lond. 228, 27–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ginsberg, J.R., Macdonald, D.W., 1990. Foxes, Wolves, Jackals, and Dogs: An Action Plan for the Conservation of Canids. IUCN/SSC Canid Specialist Group, Gland, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  14. Gosselink, T.E., Piccolo, K.A., Van Deelen, T.R., Warner, R.E., Mankin, P.C., 2010. Natal dispersal and philopatry of red foxes in urban and agricultural areas of Illinois. J. Wildl. Manage. 74, 1204–1217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Heisey, D.M., Fuller, T.K., 1985. Evaluation of survival and cause-specific mortality rates using telemetry data. J. Wildl. Manage. 49, 668–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hennessy, C.A., Dubach, J., Gehrt, S.D., 2012. Long-term pair bonding and genetic evidence for monogamy among urban coyotes (Canis latrans). J. Mammal. 93, 732–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hersteinsson, P., Macdonald, D.W., 1982. Some comparisons between red and arctic foxes, Vulpes vulpes and Alopex lagopus, as revealed by radio tracking. Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond. 49, 259–289.Google Scholar
  18. Iossa, G., Soulsbury, CD., Baker, P.J., Harris, S., 2008. Body mass, territory size, and life-history tactics in a socially monogamous canid, the red fox Vulpes vulpes. J. Mammal. 89, 1481–1490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnsingh, A.J.T., Jhala, Y.V., 2004. Indian fox. In: Sillero-Zubiri, C, Hoffmann, M., Macdonald, D.W. (Eds.), Canids: Foxes, Wolves, Jackals and Dogs. Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan. IUCN/SSC Canid Specialist Group, Gland, Switzerland, pp. 219–222.Google Scholar
  20. Kamler, J.F., Ballard, W.B., Gilliland, R.L., Lemons, P.R., Mote, K., 2003. Impacts of coyotes on swift foxes in northwestern Texas. J. Wildl. Manage. 67, 317–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kamler, J.F., Ballard, W.B., Gese, E.M., Harrison, R.L., Karki, S.M., 2004a. Dispersal characteristics of swift foxes. Can. J. Zool. 82, 1837–1842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kamler, J.F., Ballard, W.B., Gese, E.M., Harrison, R.L., Karki, S.M., Mote, K., 2004b. Adult male emigration and a female-based social organisation in swift foxes, Vulpes velox. Anim. Behav. 67, 699–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kamler, J.F., Ballard, W.B., Lemons, P.R., Mote, K., 2004c. Variation in the mating system and group structure in two populations of swift foxes, Vulpes velox. Anim. Behav. 68, 83–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kamler, J.F., Stenkewitz, U., Klare, U., Jacobsen, N.F., Macdonald, D.W., 2012. Resource partitioning among cape foxes, bat-eared foxes, and black-backed jackals in South Africa. J. Wildl. Manage. 76, 1241–1253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kamler, J.F., Stenkewitz, U., Macdonald, D.W., 2013. Lethal and sublethal effects of black-backed jackals on cape foxes and bat-eared foxes. J. Mammal. 94, 295–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kernohan, B.J., Gitzen, R.A., Millspaugh, J.J., 2001. Analysis of animal space use and movements. In: Millspaugh, J.J., Marzluff, J.M. (Eds.), Radio Tracking and Animal Populations. Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 126–168.Google Scholar
  27. Kitchen, A.M., Gese, E.M., Schauster, E.R., 1999. Resource partitioning between coyotes and swift foxes: space, time, and diet. Can. J. Zool. 77, 1645–1656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kitchen, A.M., Gese, E.M., Karki, S.M., Schauster, E.R., 2005. Spatial ecology of swift fox social groups: from group formation to mate loss. J. Mammal. 86, 547–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kleiman, D.G., 1977. Monogamy in mammals. Q. Rev. Biol. 52, 39–69.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kleiman, D.G., Eisenberg, J.F., 1973. Comparisons of canid and felid social systems from an evolutionary perspective. Anim. Behav. 21, 637–659.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Koopman, M.E., Cypher, B.L., Scrivner, J.H., 2000. Dispersal patterns of San Joaquin kit foxes (Vulpes macrotis mutica).J. Mammal. 81, 213–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lariviere, S., Seddon, P.J., 2001. Vulpes rueppelli. Mamm. Species 678, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lindsay, I.M., Macdonald, D.W., 1986. Behaviour and ecology of the Ruppell’s fox, Vulpes ruppelli, in Oman. Mammalia 50, 461–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Maas, B., Macdonald, D.W., 2004. Bat-eared foxes. In: Macdonald, D.W., Sillero-Zubiri, C. (Eds.), The Biology and Conservation of Wild Canids. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom, pp. 227–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Macdonald, D.W., Courtenay, O., Forbes, S., Mathews, F., 1999. The red fox (Vulpes vulpes) in Saudi Arabia: loose-knit groupings in the absence of territoriality. J. Zool. Lond. 249, 383–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Macdonald, D.W., Reynolds, J.C., 2004. Red fox. In: Sillero-Zubiri, C, Hoffmann, M., Macdonald, D.W. (Eds.), Canids: Foxes, Wolves, Jackals and Dogs. Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan. IUCN/SSC Canid Specialist Group, Gland, Switzerland, pp. 129–136.Google Scholar
  37. Macdonald, D.W., Creel, S., Mills, M.G.L., 2004. Society. In: Macdonald, D.W., Sillero-Zubiri, C. (Eds.), The Biology and Conservation of Wild Canids. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom, pp. 85–106.Google Scholar
  38. Moehlman, P. D., 1986. Ecology and cooperation in canids. In: Rubenstein, D.I., Wrangham, R.W. (Eds.), Ecological Aspects of Social Evolution: Birds and Mammals. Princeton, University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, pp. 64–86.Google Scholar
  39. Moehlman, P.D., 1989. Intraspecific variation in canid social systems. In: Gittleman, J.L. (Ed.), Carnivore Behavior, Ecology, and Evolution, vol. 1. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, pp. 143–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Moehlman, P.D., Hofer, H., 1997. Cooperative breeding, reproductive suppression, and body mass in canids. In: Solomon, N.G., French, J.A. (Eds.), Cooperative Breeding in Mammals. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, pp. 76–128.Google Scholar
  41. Moehrenschlager, A., Sovada, M., 2004. Swift fox. In: Sillero-Zubiri, C, Hoffmann, M., Macdonald, D.W. (Eds.), Canids: Foxes, Wolves, Jackals and Dogs. Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan. IUCN/SSC Canid Specialist Group, Gland, Switzerland, pp. 109–116.Google Scholar
  42. Morrell,S., 1972. Life history of the San Joaquin kit fox. Calif. Fish Game 58, 162–174.Google Scholar
  43. Murdoch, J.D., Munkhzul, T., Buyandelger, S., Reading, R.P., 2009. Body size and sexual dimorphism among a population of corsac and red foxes in central Mongolia. Mammalia 73, 72–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Murdoch, J.D., Munkhzul, T., Buyandelger, S., Sillero-Zubiri, C, 2010. Survival and cause-specific mortality of corsac and red foxes in Mongolia. J. Wildl. Manage. 74, 59–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nel, J.AJ., 1984. Behavioural ecology of canids in the southwestern Kalahari. Koedoe 27 (Suppl.), 229–235.Google Scholar
  46. Pusey, A.E., 1987. Sex-biased dispersal and inbreeding avoidance in birds and mammals. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2, 295–299.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Ralls, K., White, P.J., 1995. Predation on San Joaquin kit foxes by larger canids. J. Mammal. 76, 723–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ralls, K., Cypher, B., Spiegel, LA., 2007. Social monogamy in kit foxes: formation, association, duration, and dissolution of mated pairs. J. Mammal. 88, 1439–1446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schauster, E.R., Gese, E.M., Kitchen, A.M., 2002. Population ecology of swift foxes (Vulpes velox) in southeastern Colorado. Can. J. Zool. 80, 307–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shivik, J.A., Gese, E.M., 2000. Territorial significance of home range estimators for coyotes. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 28, 940–946.Google Scholar
  51. Sikes, R.S., Gannon, W.L., The Animal Care and Use Committee of the American Society of Mammalogists, 2011. Guidelines ofthe American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research. J. Mammal. 92, 235–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Skinner, J.D., Chimimba, C.T., 2005. The Mammals ofthe Southern African Subregion. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sliwa, A., 1996. A Functional Analysis of Scent Marking and Mating Behaviour in the Aardwolf Proteles cristatus (Sparrman, 1783). University of Pretoria, South Africa (Ph.D. Thesis).Google Scholar
  54. Smithers, R.H.N., 1971. The mammals of Botswana. Mus. Mem. Nat. Mus. Rhod. 4, 1–340.Google Scholar
  55. Stuart, C, Stuart, T., 2004. Cape fox. In: Sillero-Zubiri, C, Hoffmann, M., Macdonald, D.W. (Eds.), Canids: Foxes, Wolves, Jackals and Dogs. Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan. IUCN/SSC Canid Specialist Group, Gland, Switzerland, pp. 189–193.Google Scholar
  56. Voigt, D.R., Macdonald, D.W., 1984. Variation in the spatial and social behaviour of the red fox, Vulpes vulpes. Acta Zool. Fenn. 171, 261–265.Google Scholar
  57. vonSchantz, T., 1984. ‘Non-breeders’ in the red fox Vulpes vulpes: a case of resource surplus. Oikos 42, 59–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Waser, P.M., Jones, W.T., 1983. Natal philopatry among solitary mammals. Q. Rev. Biol. 58, 355–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. White, P.J., Ralls, K., 1993. Reproduction and spacing patterns of kit foxes relative to changing prey availability. J. Wildl. Manage. 57, 861–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. White, P.J., Ralls, K., Sniff, D.B., 2000. Nocturnal encounters between kit foxes. J. Mammal. 81, 456–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zabel, C.J.,Taggart, S.J., 1989. Shift in red fox, Vulpes vulpes, mating system associated with El Nino in the Bering Sea. Anim. Behav. 38, 830–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Deutsche Gesellschaft für Säugetierkunde 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of ZoologyOxford University, The Recanati-Kaplan Centre, Tubney HouseTubney, AbingdonUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations