Mammalian Biology

, Volume 76, Issue 3, pp 302–307 | Cite as

Trophic strategy of the wildcat Felis silvestris in relation to seasonal variation in the availability and vulnerability to capture of Apodemus mice

  • Ana Piñeiro
  • Isabel BarjaEmail author
Original Investigation


The aim of this study was to assess the trophic strategy of the wildcat (Felis silvestris) by examining the availability and vulnerability of its main prey. Live traps were used to estimate Apodemus mouse availability. The vulnerability to capture of wildcat main prey–Apodemus mice–was studied by focal sampling of live-trapped individuals; slow escape behaviour and body weight were used as indicators of vulnerability to capture. The seasonal consumption of Apodemus mice did not depend on their availability, although seasonality was the only factor that explained the variation in slow escape behaviour, which was more commonly seen in the autumn when the consumption of these mice was higher. Variation in mouse body weight was related to reproductive condition but not to seasonality. These results indicate that the wildcat is a facultative specialist in the consumption of Apodemus mice, with vulnerability to capture the main factor determining the rate of mouse consumption.


Wildcat Felis silvestris Apodemus mice Availability Trophic strategy Vulnerability 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Angelstam, P., Lindström, E., Widén, P., 1984. Role of predation in short-term population fluctuations of some birds and mammals in Fennoscandia. Oecologia 62, 199–208.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Aymerich, M., 1982. Etude comparative des régimenés alimentaires du lynx pardelle (Lynx pardina Temmick 1824) et du chat sauvage (Felis silvestris Schreber 1777) au centre de la Péninsule Ibérique. Mammalia 46, 515–521.Google Scholar
  3. Barja, I., Bárcena, F., 2005. Distribución y abundancia del gato montés (Felis silvestris) en un área protegida de Galicia (NO España): factores de hábitat implicados y relación con la presencia de zorro y marta. Galemys 17, 29–40.Google Scholar
  4. Belovsky, G.E., Ritchie, M.E., Moorehead, J., 1989. Foraging in complex environments: when prey availability varies over time and space. Theor. Popul. Biol. 36, 144–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Biró, Zs., Lanszki, J., Szemethy, L., Heltai, M., Randi, E., 2005. Feeding habits of feral domestic cats (Felis catus), wild cats (Felis silvestris) and their hybrids: trophic niche overlap among cat groups in Hungary. J. Zool. 266, 187–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blanco, J.C., 1998. Mamíferos de España. Geoplaneta, Barcelona.Google Scholar
  7. Caraco, T., 1980. On foraging time allocation in a stochastic environment. Ecology 61, 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carvalho, J.C., Gomes, P., 2004. Feeding resource partitioning among four sympatric carnivores in the Peneda-Gerês National Park (Portugal). J. Zool. 263, 275–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Condé, B., Nguyen-Thi-Thu-Cuc, Vaillant, F., Schauenberg, P., 1972. Le regime alimentaire du chat forestier (Felis silvestris Schreber 1977) en France. Mammalia 36, 112–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Corbett, L.K. 1979. The food of wild cats (Felis silvestris) and domestic cats (Felis catus) in Scotland. Ph. D. thesis, University Aberdeen.Google Scholar
  11. Dueñas, M.E., Peris S.J. 1985. Clave para los micromamíferos (Insectívoray Rodentia) del Centro y Sur de la Península Ibérica. Serie Varia, temas científlcos y literarios, Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca.Google Scholar
  12. Faliu, L., Lignereux, Y., Barrat, J., 1980. Identification pyrénéens. Doñ. Acta Vert. 7, 125–212.Google Scholar
  13. Genovesi, P., Boitani, L., 1992. Spacing patterns and activity rhythms of a wildcat (Felis silvestris) in Italy. In: Seminar on the Biology and Conservation of the Wildcat (Felis silvestris), Nancy, France, 23–25 September 1992. Council of Europe, Strasbourg, France, pp. 98–101.Google Scholar
  14. Gil-Sánchez, J.M., Valenzuela, G., Sánchez, J.F., 1999. Iberian wild cat (Felis silvestris tartessia) predation on rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus): functional response and age selection. Acta Theriol. 44, 421–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Glasser, J.W., 1982. A theory of trophic strategies: the evolution of facultative specialists. Ecology 63, 250–262.Google Scholar
  16. Gurnell, J., Flowerdew, J.R., 1994. Live Trapping Small Mammals. A Practical Guide. The Mammal Society, London.Google Scholar
  17. Holling, C.S., 1959. Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism. Can. Entomol. 91, 385–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Huber, S., Palme, R., Arnold, W., 2003. Effects of season, sex, and sample collection on concentrations of fecal cortisol metabolites in red deer (Cervus elaphus). Gen. Comp. Endocr. 130, 48–54.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Kacelnik, A., Bernstein, C., 1994. Modelos de optimalidad en etologia. In: Carranza, J. (Ed.), Etología: Introducción a la Ciencia del Comportamiento. Publicaciones de la Universidad de Extremadura, Caceres, pp. 153–179.Google Scholar
  20. Kitchener, A.C., 1995. The Wildcat. The Mammal Society, London.Google Scholar
  21. Kožená, I., 1990. Contribution to the food of wildcats (Felis silvestris). Folia Zool. 39, 207–212.Google Scholar
  22. Lecis, R., Pierpaoli, M., Biró, S., Szemethy, L., Ragni, B., Vercillo, F., Randi, E., 2006. Bayesian analyses of admixture in wild and domestic cats (Felis silvestris) using linked microsatellite loci. Mol. Ecol. 15, 119–131.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Levins, R. 1968. Evolution in changing environments. Ph. D. thesis, University of Princeton.Google Scholar
  24. Liberek, M. 1999. Eco-ethologie du chat sauvage Felis s. silvestris, Schreber 1777 dans le Jura Vaudois (Suisse) influence de la couverture neigeuse. Ph. D. thesis, University of Neuchatel.Google Scholar
  25. Lima, S.L., Dill, L.M., 1990. Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation. A review and prospectus. Can. J. Zool. 68, 619–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lockie, J.D., 1959. The estimation of the food of foxes. J. Wildlife Manage. 23, 224–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lozano, J., Moleón, M., Virgós, E., 2006. Biogeographical patterns in the diet of the wildcat, Felis silvestris Schreber, in Eurasia: factors affecting the trophic diversity. J. Biogeogr. 33, 1076–1085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Malo, A.F., Lozano, J., Huertas, D.L., Virgós, E., 2004. A change of diet from rodents to rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Is the wildcat (Felis silvestris) a specialist predator?. J. Zool. 263, 401–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Martin, P., Bateson, P., 1986. Measuring Behaviour: Guide. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  30. Moleón, M., Gil-Sánchez, J.M., 2003. Food habits of the Wildcat (Felis silvestris) in a peculiar habitat: the Mediterranean high mountain. J. Zool. 260, 17–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nasilov, S.B., 1972. Feeding of wildcat in Azerbaijan. Sov. J. Ecol. 3, 179–180.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Oliveira, R., Godinho, R., Randi, E., Ferrand, N., Alves, P.C., 2008. Molecular analysis of hybridisation between wild and domestic cats (Felis silvestris) in Portugal: implications for conservation. Conserv. Genet. 9, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pierpaoli, M., Birò, Z.S., Herrmann, M., Hupe, K, Fernandes, M., Ragni, B., Szemethy, L., Randi, E., 2003. Genetic distinction of wildcat (Felis silvestris) populations in Europe, and hybridization with domestic cats in Hungary. Mol. Ecol. 12, 2585–2598.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Pulgar, I. 2004. Guía de la Flora del Parque Natural Montes do Invernadeiro. Consejería de Medio Ambiente, Xunta de Galicia, Ourense.Google Scholar
  35. Ragni, B., 1978. Observations on the ecology and behaviour of the wild cat (Felis silvestris Schreber, 1777) in Italy. Carnivore Gen. Newslett. 3, 270–274.Google Scholar
  36. Randi, E., Pierpaoli, M., Beaumont, M., Ragni, B., 2001. Genetic identification of wild and domestic cats (Felis silvestris) and their hybrids using Bayesian clustering methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18, 1679–1693.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Reynolds, J.C., Aebischer, N.J., 1991. Comparison and quantification of carnivore diet by faecal analysis: a critique, with recommendations, based on a study of the fox (Vulpes vulpes). Mammal Rev. 21, 97–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rosellini, S., Barja, I., Piñeiro, A., 2008. The response of European pine marten (Martes martes L.) feeding to the changes of small mammal abundance. Pol. J. Ecol. 56, 497–504.Google Scholar
  39. Sarmento, P., 1996. Feeding ecology of the European wildcat Felis silvestris in Portugal. Acta Theriol. 41, 409–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schauenberg, P., 1981. Eléments d’écologie du chat forestier d’Europe Felis silvestris Schreber, 1777. Rev. Ecol.: Terre Vie 35, 3–36.Google Scholar
  41. Scott, R., Easterbee, N., Jefferies, D., 1992. A radio-tracking study of wildcats in western Scotland. In: Seminar on the biology and conservation of the wildcat (Felis silvestris), Nancy, France, 23–25, September, 1992. Council of Europe, Strasbourg, France, pp. 94–97.Google Scholar
  42. Stahl, P. 1986. Le chat forestier d’Europe (Felis silvestris Schreber, 1977). Exploitation des resources et organisation spatiale. Ph. D. thesis, Université Nancy.Google Scholar
  43. Stahl, P., Leger, F., 1992. Evaluation de deux méthodes d’estimation des proportions de rongeurs dans l’alimentation du chat forestier (Felis silvestris). Mammalia 56, 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stahl, P., Artois, M., Aubert, M.F.A., 1988. Organisation spatiale et déplacements des chats forestiers adultes (Felis silvestris, Schreber, 1777) en Lorraine. Rev. Ecol.: Terre Vie 43, 113–131.Google Scholar
  45. Stephens, D.W., Krebs, J.R., 1986. Foraging Theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  46. Sunquist, M., Sunquist, F., 2002. Wild Cats of the World. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Teerink, B.J., 1991. Atlas and identification key. In: Hair of West-European Mammals. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  48. Torre, I., Arrizabalaga, A., Díaz, M., 2002. Ratón de campo (Apodemus sylvaticus Linnaeus 1758). Galemys 14, 1–26.Google Scholar
  49. Urra, F. 2003. El gato montés en Navarra: Distribución, Ecología y Conservación. Ph. D. thesis, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.Google Scholar
  50. Williams, B.K., Nichols, J.D., 1984. Optimal timing in biological processes. Am. Nat. 123, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Deutsche Gesellschaft für Säugetierkunde 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Biología, Unidad de ZoologíaUniversidad Autónoma de MadridMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations