Advertisement

Mammalian Biology

, Volume 76, Issue 2, pp 208–216 | Cite as

Individuality in South American sea lion (Otaria flavescens) mother–pup vocalizations: Implications of ecological constraints and geographical variations?

  • Micaela TrimbleEmail author
  • Isabelle Charrier
Original Investigation

Abstract

Frequent mother–pup separations and reunions occurring in the South American sea lion Otaria flavescens require a well-developed individual recognition system. Individuality in mothers’ and pups’ calls of this species has been found in Península Valdés (PV), Argentina (with individuality rates of 95% and 89%, respectively). In order to test the hypotheses of ecological constraints (i.e., population density, habitat) and geographic variation affecting the characteristics and/or the individuality of vocalizations, we studied another population at Isla de Lobos (IL), Uruguay, separated by approx. 1200 km from PV. DFAs showed classification rates of 63.2% in mothers and 53.3% in pups. This lower degree of individuality can be explained by differences in population density. Differences in acoustic characteristics were also found: at IL mother and pup calls tended to be shorter in duration and mother calls lower-pitched. This can be explained by an adaptation to the local environment: at IL sea lions breed in sympatry with South American fur seals in an obstructed habitat whereas PV sea lions are the unique species in the colony constituted by an open habitat. Finally, the acoustic differences can also be a consequence of the genetic isolation that has been found between these two colonies of O. flavescens.

Keywords

Otaria flavescens Pinnipeds Vocal individuality Acoustic cues Mother–offspring recognition 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Attard, M., Pitcher, B.J., Charrier, I., Ahonen, H., Harcourt, R.G., 2010. Vocal discrimination in mate guarding male Australian sea lions: familiarity breeds contempt. Ethology 116, 704–714.Google Scholar
  2. Aubin, T., Jouventin, P., 2002. How to vocally identify a kin in a crowd: the penguin model. Adv. Stud. Behav. 31, 243–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bee, M.A., Kozich, C.E., Blackwell, K.J., Gerhardt, H.C., 2001. Individual variation in advertisement calls of territorial male green frogs, Rana clamitans: implications for individual discrimination. Ethology 107, 65–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boness, D.J., Bowen, W.D., 1996. The evolution of maternal care in pinnipeds. Bioscience 46, 645–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Campagna, C., 1985. The breeding cycle of the Southern sea lion, Otaria byronia. Mar. Mamm. Sci. 1 (3), 210–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campagna, C., Le Boeuf, B., 1988. Reproductive behaviour of southern sea lions. Behaviour 104, 233–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Campagna, C., Bisioli, C., Quintana, F., Perez, F., Vila, A., 1992. Group breeding in sea lions: pups survive better in colonies. Anim. Behav. 43, 451–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Campbell, G.S., Gisiner, R.C., Helweg, D.A., Millette, L.L., 2002. Acoustic identification of female Steller sea lions (Eumatopias jubatus). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111, 2920–2928.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Charrier, I., Harcourt, R.G., 2006. Individual vocal identity in mother and pup Australian sea lions (Neophoca cinerea). J. Mammal. 87, 929–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Charrier, I., Aubin, T., Mathevon, N., 2010. Calf’s vocal recognition by Atlantic walrus mothers: ecological constraints and adaptations. Anim. Cogn. 13, 471–482.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Charrier, I., Mathevon, N., Jouventin, P., 2001a. Mother’s voice recognition by seal pups—newborns need to learn their mother’s call before she can take off on a fishing trip. Nature 412, 873.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Charrier, I., Jouventin, P., Mathevon, N., 2001b. Individual identity coding depends on call type in the South Polar skua Catharacta maccormicki. Polar Biol. 24, 378–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Charrier, I., Mathevon, N., Jouventin, P., Aubin, T., 2001c. Acoustic communication in a black-headed gull colony: how do chicks identify their parents? Ethology 107, 961–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Charrier, I., Mathevon, N., Jouventin, P., 2002. How does a fur seal mother recognize the voice of her pup? An experimental study of Arctocephalus tropicalis. J. Exp. Biol. 205, 603–612.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Charrier, I., Mathevon, N., Jouventin, P., 2003a. Individuality in the voice of fur seal females: an analysis study of the pup attraction call in Arctocephalus tropicalis. Mar. Mamm. Sci. 19, 161–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Charrier, I., Mathevon, N., Jouventin, P., 2003b. Vocal signature recognition of mothers by fur seal pups. Anim. Behav. 65, 543–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cleator, H.J., Stirling, I., Smith, T.G., 1989. Underwater vocalizations of the bearded seal (Erignathus barbatus). Can. J. Zool. 67, 1900–1910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Clutton-Brock, T.H., 1991. The Evolution of Parental Care. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  19. Collins, K.T., Terhune, J.M., 2007. Geographic variation of Weddell seal (Leptonychotes weddellii) airborne mother-pup vocalisations. Polar Biol. 30, 1373–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Collins, K.T., Terhune, J.M., Rogers, T.L., Wheatley, K.E., Harcourt, R.G., 2006. Vocal individuality of in-air Weddell seal (Leptonychotes weddellii) pup “primary” calls. Mar. Mamm. Sci. 22, 933–951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dans, S.L., Crespo, E.A., Pedraza, S.N., Koen Alonso, M., 2004. Recovery of the South American sea lion (Otaria flavescens) population in northern Patagonia. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 61, 1681–1690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Falls, J.B., 1982. Individual recognition by sounds in birds. In: Kroodsma, D.E., Miller, E.H. (Eds.), Acoustic Communication in Birds, vol. I. Academic Press, Inc., New York, pp. 237–278.Google Scholar
  23. Fernández-Juricic, E., Campagna, C., Enriquez, V., Ortiz, C.L., 1999. Vocal communication and individual variation in breeding South American sea lions. Behaviour 136, 495–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gish, S.L., Morton, E.S., 1981. Structural adaptations to local habitat acoustics in Carolina wren songs. Z. Tierpsychol. 56, 74–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grandi, M.L., Dans, S.L., Crespo, E.A., 2008. Social composition and spatial distribution of colonies in an expanding population of South American sea lions. J. Mammal. 89, 1218–1228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Halpin, Z.T., 1991. Kin recognition cues of vertebrates. In: Hepper, P.G. (Ed.), Kin Recognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 220–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hanggi, E.B., 1992. The importance of vocal cues in mother-pup recognition in a California sea lion. Mar. Mamm. Sci. 8, 430–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Harcourt, R.G., 1992. Factors affecting early mortality in the South American fur seal (Arctocephalus australis) in Peru: density-related effects and predation. J. Zool. Lond. 226, 259–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hepper, P.G., 1986. Kin recognition: functions and mechanisms. Biol. Rev. 61, 63–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Insley, S.J., 1992. Mother-offspring separation and acoustic stereotypy: a comparison of call morphology in two species of pinnipeds. Behaviour 120, 103–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Insley, S.J., 2000. Long-term vocal recognition in the northern fur seal. Nature 406, 404–405.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Insley, S.J., 2001. Mother-offspring vocal recognition in northern fur seals is mutual but asymmetrical. Anim. Behav. 61, 129–137.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Insley, S.J., Phillips, A.V., Charrier, I., 2003. A review of social recognition in pinnipeds. Aq. Mamm. 29, 181–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jouventin, P., Aubin, T., Lengagne, T., 1999. Finding a parent in a king penguin colony: the acoustic system of individual recognition. Anim. Behav. 57, 1175–1183.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Keppel, G., 1991. Design and Analysis, A Researcher’s Handbook. Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  36. Le Boeuf, B.J., Petrinovich, L.F., 1974. Dialects of Northern elephant seals, Mirounga angustrirostris: origin and reliability. Anim. Behav. 22, 656–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lengagne, T., Lauga, J., Jouventin, P., 1997. A method of independent time and frequency decomposition of bioacoustic signals: inter-individual recognition in four species of penguins. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences 320, 885–891.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Mathevon, N., Charrier, I., Jouventin, P., 2003. Potential for individual recognition in acoustic signals: a comparative study of two gulls with different nesting patterns. C.R. Biologies 326, 329–337.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. MbuNyamsi, R.G., Aubin, T., Brémond, J.C., 1994. On the extraction of some time dependent parameters of an acoustic signal by means of the analytic signal concept. Its application to animal sound study. Bioacoustics 5, 187–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Miller, E.H., 1991. Communication in pinnipeds, with special reference to non acoustic signalling. In: Renouf, D. (Ed.), The Behaviour of Pinnipeds. Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 128–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Page, B., Goldsworthy, S.D., Hindell, M.A., 2002. Individual vocal traits of mother and pup fur seals. Bioacoustics 13, 121–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Perry, E.A., Terhune, J.M., 1999. Variation of harp seal (Pagophilus groenlandicus) underwater vocalizations among three breeding locations. J. Zool. Lond. 249, 181–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Phillips, A.V., Stirling, I., 2000. Vocal individuality in mother and pup South American fur seals, Arctocephalus australis. Mar. Mamm. Sci. 16, 592–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Quinn, G.P., Keough, M.J., 2002. Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Robisson, P., Aubin, T., Brémond, J.C., 1993. Individuality in the voice of emperor penguin Aptenodytes forsteri: adaptation to a noisy environment. Ethology 94, 279–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sokal, R.R., Rohlf, F.J., 1995. Biometry, 3rd ed. WH Freeman and Company, New York.Google Scholar
  47. Stirling, I., Warneke, R.M., 1971. Implications of a comparison of the airborne vocalizations and some aspects of the behaviour of the two Australian fur seals, Arctocephalus spp., on the evolution and present taxonomy of the genus. Aust. J. Zool. 19, 227–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Thomas, J.A., Golladay, C.L., 1995. Geographic variation in leopard seal (Hydrurga leptonynx) underwater vocalizations. In: Kastelein, R.A., Thomas, J.A., Nachtigall, P.E. (Eds.), Sensory Systems of Aquatic Mammals. De Spil Publishers, Woerden, pp. 201–221.Google Scholar
  49. Thomas, J.A., Stirling, I., 1983. Geographic variation in the underwater vocalizations of Weddell seals (Leptonychotes weddelli) from Palmer Peninsula and McMurdo Sound, Antarctica. Can. J. Zool. 61, 2203–2212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Thomas, J.A., Puddicombe, R.A., George, M., Lewis, D., 1988. Variations in underwater vocalisations of Weddell seals (Leptonychotes weddellii) at the Vestfold Hills as a measure of breeding population discreteness. Hydrobiologia 165, 279–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Trillmich, F., 1981. Mutual mother-pup recognition in Galapagos fur seals and sea lions: cues used and functional significance. Behaviour 78, 21–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Trimble, M., Insley, S.J., 2010. Mother-offspring reunion in the South American sea lion Otaria flavescens at Isla de Lobos (Uruguay): use of spatial, acoustic and olfactory cues. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 22, 233–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tripovich, J.S., Rogers, T.L., Canfield, R., Arnould, J.P.Y., 2006. Individual variation in the pup attraction call produced by female Australian fur seals during early lactation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120, 502–509.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tripovich, J.S., Canfield, R., Rogers, T.L., Arnould, J.P.Y., 2009. Individual variation of the female attraction call produced by Australian fur seal pups throughout the maternal dependence period. Bioacoustics 18, 259–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Túnez, J.I., Centrón, D., Cappozzo, H.L., Cassini, M.H., 2007. Geographic distribution and diversity of mitochondrial DNA haplotypes in South American sea lions (Otaria flavescens) and fur seals (Arctocephalus australis). Mamm. Biol. 72 (4), 193–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Van Parijs, S.M., Hastie, G.D., Thompson, P.M., 2000. Individual and geographic variation in display behaviour of male harbour seals in Scotland. Anim. Behav. 59, 559–568.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Vaz-Ferreira, R., 1965. Comportamiento antisocial en machos sub-adultos de Otaria byronia (de Blainville), (lobo marino de un pelo). Rev. Fac. Human. Cienc. Montevideo 22, 203–207.Google Scholar
  58. Vaz-Ferreira, R., 1981. South American sea lion Otaria flavescens (Shaw, 1800). In: Ridgway, S.H., Harrison, R.J. (Eds.), Handbook of Marine Mammals, vol. 1, The Walrus, Sea Lions, Fur Seals and Sea Otter, 2nd ed. Academic Press, London, pp. 39–65.Google Scholar
  59. Vaz-Ferreira, R., Achaval, F., 1979. Relación y reconocimiento materno-filial en Otaria flavescens (Shaw) “lobo de un pelo”, y reacciones de los machos subadultos ante los cachorros. Acta Zool. Lilloana 35, 295–302.Google Scholar
  60. Wartzok, D., Ketten, D.R., 1999. Marine mammals sensory systems. In: Reynolds III, J.R., Rommel, S.A. (Eds.), Biology of Marine Mammals. The Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington and London, pp. 117–175.Google Scholar
  61. Wiley, R.H., Richards, D.G., 1978. Physical constraints on acoustic communication in the atmosphere: implication for the evolution of animal vocalizations. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 3, 69–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Deutsche Gesellschaft für Säugetierkunde 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cetáceos Uruguay, Sección Etología, Facultad de CienciasUniversidad de la RepúblicaMontevideoUruguay
  2. 2.Centre de Neurosciences Paris SudUniversité Paris SudOrsayFrance
  3. 3.CNRSOrsayFrance
  4. 4.Natural Resources InstituteUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada

Personalised recommendations