Mammalian Biology

, Volume 75, Issue 2, pp 106–114 | Cite as

Habitat selection by two species of small mammals in the Atlantic Forest, Brazil: Comparing results from live trapping and spool-and-line tracking

  • Jayme Augusto PrevedelloEmail author
  • Renato Garcia Rodrigues
  • Emygdio Leite Araujo de Monteiro-Filho
Original Investigation


Habitat selection by small mammals is usually evaluated using data from live trapping, which provides little information about the movements of individuals. Few studies used movement data or compared the results of different sampling methods to study habitat selection by these animals. We evaluated habitat selection by the rodent Nectomys squamipes and the marsupial Micoureus paraguayanus in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil using the spool-and-line technique. We also determined if percentage of captures reflected the amount of movements in each habitat. Habitat selection was determined comparing use and availability of five habitat types at two spatial scales (movement paths and movement areas) using compositional analysis, which allowed ranking of habitats according to their relative use by animals. The use of available habitat types was non-random for both species at both spatial scales. The two species had contrasting habitat affinities directly related to their particular habits, with N. squamipes using predominantly the stream habitat, and M. paraguayanus using mainly the restinga forest habitat. Patterns of habitat selection were similar at both spatial scales probably due to the small size of movement areas, which may not represent habitat use at a broader scale. For both species, live trapping and movement data provided the same ranking in habitat use, demonstrating that simple capture indices may be used to study habitat selection by these species across different habitat types.


Comparison of methods Compositional analysis Habitat availability Habitat use Movement areas 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aebischer, N.J., Robertson, P.A., Kenward, R.E., 1993. Compositional analysis of habitat use from animal radio-tracking data. Ecology 74, 1313–1325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Almeida, A.J., Torquetti, C.G., Talamoni, S.A., 2008. Use of space by the neotropical marsupial Didelphis albiventris (Didelphimorphia: Didelphidae) in an urban forest fragment. Rev. Bras. Zool. 25, 214–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bergallo, H.G., Magnusson, W.E., 2004. Factors affecting the use of space by two rodent species in Brazilian Atlantic forest. Mammalia 68, 121–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bingham, R.L., Brennan, L.A., 2004. Comparison of type 1 error rates for statistical analyses of resource selection. J. Wildl. Manage. 68, 206–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonvicino, C.R., Lindbergh, S.M., Maroja, L.S., 2002. Small non-flying mammals from conserved and altered areas of Atlantic Forest and Cerrado: comments on their potential use for monitoring environment. Braz. J. Biol. 62, 765–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boonstra, R., Craine, T.M., 1986. Natal nest location and small mammal tracking with a spool and line technique. Can. J. Zool. 64, 1034–1036.Google Scholar
  7. Briani, D.C., Vieira, E.M., Vieira, M.V., 2001. Nests and nesting sites of Brazilian forest rodents (Nectomys squamipes and Oryzomys intermedius) as revealed by a spool-and-line device. Acta Theriol. 46, 331–334.Google Scholar
  8. Coppeto, S.A., Kelt, D.A., Vuren, D.H.V., Wilson, J.A., Bigelow, S., 2006. Habitat associations of small mammals at two spatial scales in the Northern Sierra Nevada. J. Mammal. 87, 402–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cox, M.P.G., Dickman, C.R., Cox, W.G., 2000. Use of habitat by the black rat (Rattus rattus) at North Head, New South Wales: an observational and experimental study. Aust. Ecol. 25, 375–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cunha, A.A., Vieira, M.V., 2002. Support diameter, incline, and vertical movements of four didelphid marsupials in the Atlantic forest of Brazil. J. Zool. (London) 258, 419–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Douglass, R.J., 1989. The use of radio-telemetry to evaluate microhabitat selection by deer mice. J. Mammal. 70, 648–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dunstone, N., Durbin, L., Wyllie, I., Freer, R., Jamett, G.A., Mazzolli, M., Rose, S., 2002. Spatial organization, ranging behaviour and habitat use of the kodkod (Oncifelis guigna) in southern Chile. J. Zool. (London) 257, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dueser, R.D., Shugart, H.H., 1978. Microhabitats in a forest-floor small mammal fauna. Ecology 59, 89–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Emmons, L.H., 1997. In: Neotropical Rainforest Mammals: A Field Guide 2nd edition The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  15. Ernest, K.A., 1986. Nectomys squamipes. Mamm. Species 265, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ernest, K.A., Mares, M.A., 1986. Ecology of Nectomys squamipes, the neotropical Water-rat, in central Brazil: home range, habitat selection, reproduction and behaviour. J. Zool. (London) 210, 599–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. ESRI. 1999. ArcView®GIS 3.2. Environmental Systems Research Institute, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Finlayson, G.R., Vieira, E.M., Priddel, D., Wheeler, R., Bentley, J., Dickman, C.R., 2008. Multi-scale patterns of habitat use by re-introduced mammals: a case study using medium-sized marsupials. Biol. Conserv. 141, 320–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fonseca, G.A.B., Redford, K.H., 1984. The mammals of IBGE’s Ecological Reserve, Brasília, and an analysis of the role of gallery forests in increasing diversity. Rev. Bras. Biol. 44, 517–523.Google Scholar
  20. Freitas, S.R., Astúa de Moraes, D., Santori, R.T., Cerqueira, R., 1997. Habitat preference and food use by Metachirus nudicaudatus and Didelphis aurita (Didelphimorphia, Didelphidae) in a restinga forest at Rio de Janeiro. Rev. Bras. Biol. 57, 93–98.Google Scholar
  21. Gannon, W.L., Sikes, R.S., The Animal Care and Use Committee of The American Society of Mammalogists, 2007. Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research. J. Mammal. 88, 809–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Garshelis, D.L., 2000. Delusions in habitat evaluation: measuring use, selection, and importance. In: Boitani, L., Fuller, T.K. (Eds.), Research Techniques in Animal Ecology: Controversies and Consequences. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 111–164.Google Scholar
  23. Graham, C., 2001. Habitat selection and activities budgets of keel-billed toucans at the landscape level. The Condor 103, 776–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gentile, R., Fernandez, F.A.S., 1999. Influence of habitat structure on a streamside small mammal community in a Brazilian rural area. Mammalia 63, 29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Holbrook, S., 1979. Vegetational affinities, arboreal activity, and coexistence of three species of rodents. J. Mammal. 60, 528–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hooge, P.N., Eichenlaub, B. 2000. Animal movement extension to Arcview. ver. 2.0. Alaska Science Center — Biological Science Office, U.S. Geological Survey, Anchorage.Google Scholar
  27. Johnson, D.H., 1980. The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology 61, 65–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jorgensen, E.E., Demarais, S., 1999. Spatial scale dependence of rodent habitat use. J. Mammal. 80, 421–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lacher Jr, T.E., Alho, C.J.R., 1989. Microhabitat use among small mammals in the Brazilian Pantanal. J. Mammal. 70, 396–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Leban, F. 1999. Resource Selection for Windows. Version 1.00 (Beta 8.4 — May 28).Google Scholar
  31. Loretto, D., Vieira, M.V., 2005. The effects of reproductive and climatic seasons on movements in the black-eared opossum (Didelphis aurita Wied-Neuwied, 1826). J. Mammal. 86, 287–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Miles, M.A., Souza, A.A., Póvoa, M.M., 1981. Mammal tracking and nest location in Brazilian forest with an improved spool-and-line device. J. Zool. (London) 195, 331–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Morris, D.W., 1987. Ecological scale and habitat use. Ecology 68, 362–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Moura, M.C., Caparelli, A.C., Freitas, S.R., Vieira, M.V., 2005. Scale-dependent habitat selection in three didelphid marsupials using the spool-and-line technique in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil. J. Trop. Ecol. 21, 337–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Patton, J.L., Costa, L.P., 2003. Molecular phylogeography and species limits in rainforest didelphid marsupials of South America. In: Jones, M., Dickman, C., Archer, M. (Eds.), Predators with Pouches: The Biology of Carnivorous Marsupials. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, pp. 63–81.Google Scholar
  36. Prevedello, J.A., Rodrigues, R.G., Monteiro-Filho, E.L.A., 2009. Vertical use of space by the marsupial Micoureus paraguayanus (Didelphimorphia, Didelphidae) in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil. Acta Theriol. 54, 259–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stapp, P., 1997. Habitat selection by an insectivorous rodent: patterns and mechanisms across multiple scales. J. Mammal. 78, 1128–1143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Steinwald, M.C., Swanson, B.J., Waser, P.M., 2006. Effects of spool-and-line tracking on small desert mammals. Southw. Nat. 51, 71–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Thompson, S.D., 1982. Microhabitat utilization and foraging behavior of bipedal and quadrupedal heteromyid rodents. Ecology 63, 1303–1312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Valenzuela, D., Ceballos, G., 2000. Habitat selection, home range and activity of the White-nosed coati (Nasua narica) in a Mexican tropical dry forest. J. Mammal. 81, 810–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Vieira, E.M., Iob, G., Briani, D.C., Palma, A.R.T., 2005. Microhabitat selection and daily movements of two rodents (Necromys lasiurus and Oryzomys scotti) in Brazilian Cerrado, as revealed by a spool-and-line device. Mammal. Biol. 70, 359–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vieira, M.V., Cunha, A.A., 2008. Scaling body mass and use of space in three species of marsupials in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil. Aust. Ecol. 33, 872–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zar, J.H., 1999. Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Deutsche Gesellschaft für Säugetierkunde 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jayme Augusto Prevedello
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Renato Garcia Rodrigues
    • 1
    • 2
  • Emygdio Leite Araujo de Monteiro-Filho
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Laboratório de Biologia e Ecologia de Vertebrados, Departamento de ZoologiaUniversidade Federal do ParanáCuritibaBrazil
  2. 2.Instituto de Pesquisas CananéiaCampinasBrazil

Personalised recommendations