Advertisement

Mammalian Biology

, Volume 75, Issue 4, pp 358–362 | Cite as

Population density of a coastal island population of the ocelot in Atlantic Forest, southeastern Brazil

  • Roberto Fusco-CostaEmail author
  • Bianca Ingberman
  • Hilton Thadeu Zarate do Couto
  • Eduardo Nakano-Oliveira
  • Emygdio Leite de Araujo Monteiro-Filho
Short Communication

Keywords

Leopardus pardalis Camera trap Capture-recapture Carnivore Ilha do Cardoso 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Almeida, A.P., 1946. Memória histórica da Ilha do Cardoso. Revista do Arquivo Municipal 111, 19–52.Google Scholar
  2. Barros, F., Melo, M.M.R.F., Chiea, S.A.C., Kirizawa, M., Wanderley, M.G.L., Jung-Mendaçolli, S.L., 1991. Flora fanerogâmica da Ilha do Cardoso: caracterização geral da vegetação e listagem das espécies ocorrentes. São Paulo, Hucitec.Google Scholar
  3. Crawshaw Jr., P.G., Quigley, H.B., 1989. Notes on ocelot movement and activity in the Pantanal region, Brazil. Biotropica 21, 377–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Crawshaw Jr., P.G., 1995. Comparative ecology of ocelot (Felis pardalis) and jaguar (Panthera onca) in a protected subtropical forest in Brazil and Argentina. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville, 189 pp.Google Scholar
  5. Di Bitetti, M.S., Paviolo, A., De Angelo, C., 2006. Density, habitat use and activity patterns of ocelots (Leopardus pardalis) in the Atlantic Forest of Misiones, Argentina. J. Zool. 270, 153–163.Google Scholar
  6. Di Bitetti, M.S., Paviolo, A., De Angelo, C., Di Blanco, Y.E., 2008. Local and continental correlates of the abundance of a neotropical cat, the ocelot (Leopardus pardalis). J. Trop. Ecol. 24, 189–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dillon, A., Kelly, M.J., 2007. Ocelot activity, trap success, and density in Belize: the impact of trap spacing and distance moved on density estimates. Oryx 41, 469–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dillon, A., Kelly, M.J., 2008. Ocelot home range, overlap and density: comparing radio telemetry with camera trapping. J. Zool. 275, 391–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Emmons, L., 1988. A field study of ocelots (Leopardus pardalis) in Peru. Revue D’Ecologie, La Terre et la Vie 43, 133–157.Google Scholar
  10. Funari, F.L., Struffaldi-De Vuono, Y., Salum, S.T., 1987. Balanço hídrico de duas áreas de Mata Atlântica: Reserva Biológica de Paranapiacaba e Parque Estadual da Ilha do Cardoso (Estado de São Paulo). In: Pereira, M.F.A., Massei, M.A.S. (Eds.), Anais do VI Congresso da Sociedade Botânica de São Paulo, Campinas, pp. 95–101.Google Scholar
  11. Haines, A.M., Janecka, J.E., Tewes, M.E., Grassman Jr, L.I., Morton, P., 2006. The importance of private lands for ocelot Leopardus pardalis conservation in the United States. Oryx 40, 90–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ingberman, B., Fusco-Costa, R., Monteiro-Filho, E.L.A., 2009. Population survey and demographic features of a coastal island population of Alouatta clamitans in Atlantic Forest, southeastern Brazil. Int. J. Primatol. 30, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jacob, A.A., 2002. Ecologia e conservação da jaguatirica no Parque Estadual Morro do Diabo, Pontal do Paranapanema, SP. MSc Dissertation, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, 56 pp.Google Scholar
  14. Karanth, K.U., Nichols, J.D., 1998. Estimation of tiger densities in India using photographic captures and recaptures. Ecology 79, 2852–2862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ludlow, M.E., Sunquist, M.E., 1987. Ecology and behavior of ocelots in Venezuela. Nat. Geo. Res. 3, 447–461.Google Scholar
  16. Machado, A.B.M., Martins, C.S., Drummond, G.M., 2005. Livro vermelho das espécies ameaçadas de extinção: incluindo as espécies quase ameaçadas e deficientes em dados. Fundação Biodiversitas, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.Google Scholar
  17. Maffei, L., Noss, A.J., Cuéller, E., Rumiz, D., 2005. Ocelot (Felis pardalis) population densities, activity, and ranging behaviour in the dry forests of easter Bolívia: data from camera trapping. J. Trop. Ecol. 21, 349–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Maffei, L., Noss, A.J., 2008. How small is too small? Camera trap survey areas and density estimates for ocelots in the Bolivian Chaco. Biotropica 40, 71–75.Google Scholar
  19. Mares, R., Moreno, R.S., Kays, R.W., Wikelski, M., 2008. Predispersal home range shift of an ocelot Leopardus pardalis (Carnivora: Felidae) on Barro Colorado Island, Panamá. Rev. Biol. Trop. 56, 779–787.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Melo, M.M.R.F., Montovani, W., 1994. Composição florística e estrutura de trecho de Mata Atlântica de encosta, na ilha do Cardoso (Cananéia, SP, Brasil). Boletim do Instituto de Botânica 9, 107–158.Google Scholar
  21. Murray, J.L., Gardner, G.L., 1997. Leopardus pardalis. Mamm. Species 548, 1–10.Google Scholar
  22. Nakano-Oliveira, E., 2006. Ecologia e Conservaçãode mamíferos carnívoros de Mata Atlântica na regiãodo complexo estuarino lagunar de Cananéia, Estado de São Paulo. Ph.D. Dissertation, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, 217 pp.Google Scholar
  23. Nowell, K., Jackson, P., 1996. Wild Cats: Status Survey and Action Plan. IUCN, Gland.Google Scholar
  24. Oliveira, T.G., Cassaro, K., 2005. Guia de campo dos felinos do Brasil. Instituto Pró-Carnívoros, Sociedade de Zoológicos do Brasil, Fundação Parque Zoológico de São Paulo e Pró-Vida Brasil, São Paulo.Google Scholar
  25. Otis, D.L., Burnham, K.P., White, G.C., Anderson, D.R., 1978. Statistical inference from the capture data on closed animal population. Wildl. Monogr. 62, 1–135.Google Scholar
  26. Rexstad, E., Burnham, K.P., 1991. User’s Guide for Interactive Program CATURE. Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Colorado State University, Collins.Google Scholar
  27. Sampaio, D., Souza, V.C., Oliveira, A.A., Paula-Souza, J., Rodrigues, R.R., 2005. Árvores da Restinga: Guia de Identificação. Editora Neotropica, São Paulo.Google Scholar
  28. Silver, S.C., Ostro, L.E.T., Marsh, L.K., Maffei, L., Noss, A.J., Kelly, M.J., Wallace, R.B., Gomez, H., Ayala, G., 2004. The use of camera traps for estimating jaguar Panthera onca abundance and density using capture/recapture analysis. Oryx 38, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Soisalo, M.K., Cavalcanti, S.M.C., 2006. Estimating the density of a jaguar population in the Brazilian Pantanal using camera-trap and capture-recapture sampling in combination with GPS radio-telemetry. Biol. Conserv. 129, 187–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tabarelli, M., Pinto, L.P., Silva, J.M.C., Hirota, M., Bedê, L., 2005. Challenges and opportunities for biodiversity conservation in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Conserv. Biol. 19, 695–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Thompson, W.L., White, G.C., Gowan, C., 1998. Monitoring Vertebrate Populations. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
  32. Trolle, M., Kéry, M., 2003. Estimation of ocelot density in the pantanal using capture-recapture analysis of camera-trapping data. J. Mammal. 84, 607–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Trolle, M., Kéry, M., 2005. Camera-trap study of ocelot and other secretive mammals in the northern Pantanal. Mammalia 69, 405–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. White, G.C., Anderson, D.R., Burnham, K.P., Otis, D.L., 1982. Capture-Recapture and Removal Methods for Sampling Closed Populations. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Deutsche Gesellschaft für Säugetierkunde 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roberto Fusco-Costa
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Bianca Ingberman
    • 1
  • Hilton Thadeu Zarate do Couto
    • 3
  • Eduardo Nakano-Oliveira
    • 1
  • Emygdio Leite de Araujo Monteiro-Filho
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Instituto de Pesquisas Cananeia (IPeC)CuritibaBrazil
  2. 2.Post-Graduate Program in Applied Ecology, Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de QueirozUniversidade de São Paulo (ESALQ, USP)PiracicabaBrazil
  3. 3.Departamento de Ciências Florestais, Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de QueirozUniversidade de São PauloPiracicabaBrazil
  4. 4.Departamento de Zoologia, Laboratório de Biologia e Ecologia de VertebradosUniversidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)CuritibaBrazil

Personalised recommendations