Mammalian Biology

, Volume 75, Issue 1, pp 1–9 | Cite as

Spatial ecology of monito del monte (Dromiciops gliroides) in a fragmented landscape of southern Chile

  • Francisco E. FontúrbelEmail author
  • Eduardo A. Silva-Rodríguez
  • Nelson H. Cárdenas
  • Jaime E. Jiménez
Original Investigation


Habitat loss is one of the most important causes of biodiversity loss in South American temperate rainforests, where many endemic species exist. Among these is the monito del monte (Dromiciops gliroides), an arboreal marsupial with restricted distribution, and the only extant species of the order Microbiotheria. Current knowledge about monito del monte habitat use and its responses to human disturbances is scarce. To help fill this gap we investigated its habitat use and selection patterns in a fragmented landscape in southern Chile. Monito del monte individuals were abundant in a large and a small fragment, but rare or undetected in forest strips. Using telemetry data from 12 neighboring individuals in a large fragment and 2 individuals in a small fragment, we estimated their mean home range size of 1.6 ha±0.6 (1SD). Monitos del monte had a spatial overlap among individuals of 50±4%. Tracked individuals used old- and second-growth habitats as available, did not use the prairie habitats, and strongly avoided the scrublands. In the large fragment we estimated a relative population density of 21±5 individuals/ha (mean±1SD), whereas in the small fragment it was of 19±6 individuals/ha. This is, to our knowledge, the first study of the spatial ecology of the monito del monte based on telemetry data, and evidence presented here could have conservation and planning implications, not only for the target species but also its habitat.


Dromiciops gliroides Home range Habitat use Temperate forest Southern Chile 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aarts, G., MacKenzie, M., McConnell, B., Fedak, M., Matthiopoulos, J., 2007. Estimating space-use and habitat preference from wildlife telemetry data. Ecography 31, 140–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aebischer, N.J., Robertson, P.A., Kenward, R.E., 1993. Compositional analysis of habitat use from animal radio-tracking data. Ecology 74, 1313–1325.Google Scholar
  3. Aizen, M.A., 2003. Influences of animal pollination and seed dispersal on winter flowering in a temperate mistletoe. Ecology 84, 2613–2627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aizen, M.A., Vásquez, D.P., Smith-Ramírez, C., 2002. Historial natural y conservatión de los mutualismos planta-animal del bosque templado de Sudamérica austral. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 75, 79–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Amico, G., Aizen, M.A., 2000. Mistletoe seed dispersal by a marsupial. Nature 408, 929–930.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Amico, G., Rodríguez-Cabal, M.A., Aizen, M.A., 2009. The potential key seed-dispersing role of the arboreal marsupial Dromiciops gliroides. Acta Oecologica 35, 8–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Börger, L., Dalziel, B.D., Fryxell, J.M., 2008. Are there general mechanisms of animal home range behaviour? A review and prospects for future research. Ecology Letters 11, 637–650.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Castellón, T.D., Sieving, K.E., 2006a. Landscape history, fragmentation, and patch occupancy: models for a forest bird with limited dispersal. Ecological Applications 16, 2223–2234.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Castellón, T.D., Sieving, K.E., 2006b. An experimental test of matrix permeability and corridor use by an endemic understory bird. Conservation Biology 20, 135–145.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Castellón, T.D., Sieving, K.E., 2007. Sustainable patch networks and landscape connections for an endemic understory bird with limited dispersal ability. Ecological Applications 17, 2152–2163.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Chapin III, F.S., Zavaleta, E.S., Eviner, V.T., Naylor, R.L., Vitousek, P.M., Reynolds, H.L., Hooper, D.U., Lavorel, S., Sala, O.E., Hobbie, S.E. Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature 405, 234–242.Google Scholar
  12. Díaz, M., Teta, P., 2008. Dromiciops gliroides. In: IUCN (Ed.), Red List of Threatened Species. Downloaded on 23 June 2009: <>.
  13. Echeverria, C., Newton, A., Lara, A., Rey-Benayas, J.M., Coomes, D., 2007. Impact of forest fragmentation on species composition and forest structure in the temperate landscape of southern Chile. Global Ecology and Biogeography 16, 426–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Echeverria, C., Coomes, D., Salas, J., Rey-Benayas, J.M., Lara, A., Newton, A., 2006. Rapid deforestation and fragmentation of Chilean temperate forest. Biological Conservation 130, 481–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eldridge, W.D., MacNamara, M.M., Pacheco, N.V., 1987. Activity patterns and habitat utilization of pudus (Pudu puda) in south-central Chile. In: Wemmer, C.M. (Ed.), Biology and Management of the Cervidae. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp. 352–370.Google Scholar
  16. Fontúrbel, F.E., 2009. A methodological approach to assess the small mammal community diversity in the temperate rainforest of Patagonia. Mammalian Biology Scholar
  17. Fontúrbel, F.E., Jiménez, J.E., 2009. Underestimation of abundances of the monito del monte (Dromiciops gliroides) due to a sampling artifact. Journal of Mammalogy 90(6), in press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gannon, W.L., Sikes, R.S., Animal Care and Use Committee, 2007. Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research. Journal of Mammalogy 88, 809–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. García, D., Rodríguez-Cabal, M.A., Amico, G., 2009. Seed dispersal by a frugivorous marsupial shapes the spatial scale of a mistletoe population. Journal of Ecology 97, 217–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Garshelis, D.L., 2000. Delusions in habitat evaluation: measuring use, selection and importance. In: Boitani, L., Fuller, T.K. (Eds.), Research Techniques in Animal Ecology. Columbia University Press, New York, NY, pp. 111–164.Google Scholar
  21. Hershkovitz, P., 1999. Dromiciops gliroides Thomas, 1894, last of the Microbiotheria (Marsupialia), with a review of the family Microbiotheriidae. Fieldiana Zoology 93, 1–60.Google Scholar
  22. Hopkins, H.L., Kennedy, M.L., 2004. An assessment of indices of relative and absolute abundance for monitoring populations of small mammals. Wildlife Society Bulletin 32, 1289–1296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. IUCN, 2007. 2007 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: <>
  24. Jiménez, J.E., Rageot, R., 1979. Notas sobre la biología del monito del monte (Dromiciops australis Philippi 1893). Anales del Museo de Historia Natural de Valparaíso (Chile) 12, 83–88.Google Scholar
  25. Kelt, D.A., 2006. Efectos de la fragmentación del bosque lluvioso templado sobre los pequeños mamiferos. In: Grez, A.A., Simonetti, J.A., Bustamante, R.O. (Eds.), Biodiversidad en Ambientes Fragmentados de Chile: Patrones y Procesos a Diferentes Escalas. Editorial Universitaria, Santiago de Chile, pp. 115–142.Google Scholar
  26. Kernohan, B.J., Gitzen, R., Millspaugh, J.J., 1999. Analysis of animal space use and movements. In: Millspaugh, J.J., Marzluff, J.M. (Eds.), Radio Tracking and Animal Populations. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 125–166.Google Scholar
  27. Lindenmayer, D.B., Nix, H.A., 1993. Ecological principles for the design of wildlife corridors. Conservation Biology 7, 627–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lobos, G., Charrier, A., Carrasco, G., Palma, R.E., 2006. Presence of Dromiciops gliroides (Microbiotheria: Microbiotheriidae) in the deciduous forests of central Chile. Mammalian Biology 70, 376–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Marshall, L.G., 1978. Dromiciops australis. Mammalian Species 99, 1–5.Google Scholar
  30. Mech, S.G., Hallett, J.G., 2001. Evaluating the effectiveness of corridors: a genetic approach. Conservation Biology 15, 467–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nichols, J.D., Pollock, K.H., 1983. Estimation methology in contemporary small mammals capture-recapture studies. Journal of Mammalogy 64, 253–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Otis, D.L., Burnham, K.P., White, G.C., Anderson, D.R., 1978. Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations. Wildlife Monographs 62, 1–135.Google Scholar
  33. Pardini, R., Marques de Souza, S., Braga-Neto, R., Metzger, J.P., 2005. The role of forest structure, fragment size and corridors in mantaining small mammal abundance and diversity in an Atlantic forest landscape. Biological Conservation 124, 253–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Parmenter, R.R., Yater, T.L., Anderson, D.R., Burnham, K.P., Dunnum, J.L., Franklin, A.B., Friggens, M.T., Lubow, B.C., Miller, M., Olson, G.S. Small-mammal density estimation: a field comparisons of grid-based and web-based density estimators. Ecological Monographs 73, 1–26.Google Scholar
  35. Reid, S., Díaz, I., Armesto, J.J., Willson, M.F., 2004. Importance of native bamboo for understory birds in Chilean temperate forests. Auk 121, 515–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rodríguez-Cabal, M.A., 2008. Habitat assessment for a threatened marsupial in temperate forest of Patagonia. In: M.Sc. Thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 40pp.Google Scholar
  37. Rodríguez-Cabal, M.A., Aizen, M.A., Novaro, A.J., 2007. Habitat fragmentation disrupts a plant-disperser mutualism in the temperate forest of South America. Biological Conservation 139, 195–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rodríguez-Cabal, M.A., Amico, G., Novaro, A.J., Aizen, M.A., 2008. Population characteristics of Dromiciops gliroides (Phillipi, 1893), an endemic marsupial of the temperate forest of Patagonia. Mammalian Biology 73, 74–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Saavedra, B., Simonetti, J.A., 2001. New records of Dromiciops gliroides (Microbiotheria: Microbiotheriidae) and Geoxus valdivianus (Rodentia: Muridae) in central Chile: their implications for biogeography and conservation. Mammalia 65, 96–100.Google Scholar
  40. Seaman, D.E., Powell, R.A., 1996. An evaluation of the accuracy of kernel density estimators for home range analysis. Ecology 77, 2075–2085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sieving, K.E., Willson, M.F., de Santo, T.L., 1996. Habitat barriers to movement of understory birds in fragmented south-temperate rainforest. Auk 113, 944–949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sieving, K.E., Willson, M.F., de Santo, T.L., 2000. Defining corridor functions for endemic birds in fragmented south-temperate rainforest. Conservation Biology 14, 1120–1132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Smith-Ramírez, C., 2004. The Chilean coastal range: a vanishing center of biodiversity and endemism in South American temperate rainforests. Biodiversity and Conservation 13, 373–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Southwood, T.R.E., Henderson, P.A., 2000. Ecological Methods. Blackwell Science, Oxford.Google Scholar
  45. StatSoft, 2004. STATISTICA, version 7: <>.
  46. White, G.C., Burnham, K.P., 1999. Program MARK: Survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46, 120–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Withey, J.C., Bloxton, T.D., Marzluff, J.M., 1999. Effects of tagging and location error in wildlife radiotelemetry studies. In: Millspaugh, J.J., Marzluff, J.M. (Eds.), Radio Tracking and Animal Populations. Academic Press, San Diego CA, pp. 45–81.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Deutsche Gesellschaft für Säugetierkunde 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francisco E. Fontúrbel
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Eduardo A. Silva-Rodríguez
    • 3
  • Nelson H. Cárdenas
    • 4
  • Jaime E. Jiménez
    • 2
  1. 1.Laboratorio de Ecología Terrestre, Facultad de CienciasUniversidad de ChileSantiagoChile
  2. 2.Laboratorio de Vida SilvestreUniversidad de Los LagosOsornoChile
  3. 3.Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation and School of Natural Resources and EnvironmentUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  4. 4.Complejo Ecoturístico Cascadas-Proyecto IBAMUniversidad de Los LagosOsornoChile

Personalised recommendations