Mammalian Biology

, Volume 73, Issue 6, pp 423–429 | Cite as

Is habitat selection by the Cabrera vole (Microtus cabrerae) related to food preferences?

  • Inês T. RosárioEmail author
  • Paulo E. Cardoso
  • Maria da Luz Mathias
Original Investigation


The Cabrera vole (Microtus cabrerae) is an Iberian endemism considered threatened both in Portugal and Spain. This vole is often referred to as a tall perennial grassland community specialist. However, a recent study revealed that the Cabrera vole exploits a wide variety of grasslands in south Portugal. The major aim of the present study was to test the palatability of 21 plant species of this region occurring within or outside typical perennial grassland colonies in order to assess vole’s food preferences. Results showed a major consumption of monocotyledons and annual plants (such as Festuca ampla, Agrostis castellana, Brachypodium distachyon, B. phoenicoides and Vulpia geniculata), but no relationship was found between diet selection and perennial grassland plant communities. The preference of voles for annual species, occurring more abundantly outside the colonies, raises the hypothesis that the establishment of a colony might be determined by plant species abundance and persistence over the year, rather than by their palatability. This seems to be particularly evident in this region, where summer meteorological conditions make vegetation unavailable outside the colonies.


Microtus cabrerae Palatability Plants growth strategy Grassland communities Food preferences 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ayanz, A.S.M. 1994. El topillo de cabrera, una reliquia faunística de la peninsula Ibérica. Quercus, 14–18.Google Scholar
  2. Ayanz, A.S.M. 1992. Inventario De La Población Española De Topillo De Cabrera (Microtus cabrerae Thomas, 1906). Madrid: Project 200/G91072010, Ministerio de Agricultura, Pescas y Alimentatión.Google Scholar
  3. Basey, J.M., Jenkins, S.H. 1993. Production of chemical defences in relation to plant growth rate. Oikos 68, 323–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Batzli, G.O. 1985. Nutrition. In: Tamarin, R.H. (Ed.), Biology of New World Microtus. The American Society of Mammalogists, Boston, pp. 779–811.Google Scholar
  5. Batzli, G.O., Lesieutre, C. 1991. The influence of high quality food on habitat use by artic microtine rodents. Oikos 60, 299–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Batzli, G.O., Pitelka, F.A. 1971. Condition and diet of cycling populations of the California vole, Microtus californicus. J. Mammol. 52, 141–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Batzli, G.O., Pitelka, F.A. 1983. Nutritional ecology of microtine rodenst: food habits of lemmings near Barrow, Alaska. J. Mammol. 64, 648–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berger, P.J., Sanders, E.H., Gardner, P.D., Negus, N.C. 1977. Phenolic plant compounds functioning as reproductive inhibitors in Microtus montanus. Science 195, 575–577.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blanco, J.C., Gonzalez, J.L. 1992. Red Book of Spanish Vertebrates. Madrid: Instituto para la conservación de la naturaleza.Google Scholar
  10. Blondel, J., Aronson, J. 1999. Biology and Wildlife of the Mediterranean Region. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Bryant, J.P., Chapin, F.S.I., Klein, D.R. 1983. Carbon/nutrient balance of boreal plants in relation to vertebrate herbivory. Oikos 40, 357–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cabral, M., Almeida, J., Almeida, P., Delinger, T., Ferrand Almeida, N., Oliveira, M., Palmeirim, J., Queiroz, A., Rogado, L., Santos-Reis, M. 2005. Portuguese Red Data Book. Lisboa: Instituto da Conservação da Natureza.Google Scholar
  13. Cole, F.R., Batzli, G.O. 1979. Nutrition and population dynamics of the prairie vole, Microtus ochrogaster, in central Illinois. J. Anim. Ecol. 48, 455–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Coley, P.D. 1988. Effect of plant growth rate and leaf lifetime on the amount and type of anti-herbivore defense. Oecologia 74, 531–536.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Coley, P.D., Bryant, J.P., Chapin, F.S.I. 1985. Resource availability and plant anti-herbivore defense. Science 230, 895–899.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Correia, A.I., Nisa, S. 1999. Flora vascular. In: Santos-Reis, M., Correia, A.I. (Eds.), Caracterização Da Flora e Da Fauna Do Montado Da Herdade Da Ribeira Abaixo (Grândola-Baixo Alentejo). CBA, Lisboa, pp. 47–60.Google Scholar
  17. Ericson, L., Oksanen, L. 1987. The impact of controlled grazing by Clethrionomys rufocanus on experimental guilds of boreal forest floor herbs. Oikos 50, 403–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fernandez-Salvador, R. 1998. Topillo de Cabrera, Microtus cabrerae Thomas, 1906. Galemys 10, 5–18.Google Scholar
  19. Gadhi, C.A., Benharref, A., Jana, M., Basile, A.M., Content-Audonneau, N., Fortier, B. 2001. Antidermatophitic properties of extracts from the leaves of Aristolochia paucinervis Pomel. J. Ethnopharmacol. 75, 209–211.Google Scholar
  20. Gali-Muhtasib, H.U., Smith, C.C. 1992. The effect of silica in grasses on the feeding behavior of the prairie vole, Microtus ochrogaster. Ecology 73, 1724–1729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Getz, L.L. 1985. Habitats. In: Tamarin, R.H. (Ed.), Biology of New World Microtus. The American Society of Mammalogists, Boston, pp. 286–309.Google Scholar
  22. Goldberg, M., Tabroff, N.R., Tamarin, R.H. 1980. Nutrient variation in beach grass in relation to beach vole feeding. Ecology 61, 1029–1033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hartley, S.E., Nelson, K., Gorman, M. 1995. The effect of fertiliser and shading on plant chemical composition and palatability to Orkney voles, Microtus arvalis orcadensis. Oikos 72, 79–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hjältén, J., Danell, K., Ericson, L. 1996. Food selection by two vole species in relation to plant growth strategies and plant chemistry. Oikos 76, 181–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lindroth, R.L., Batzli, G.O. 1984. Food habits of the meadow vole (Microtus pennsylvanicus) in bluegrass and prairie habitats. J. Mammol. 65, 600–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Marquis, R.J., Batzli, G.O. 1989. Influence of chemical factors on palatability of forage to voles. J. Mammol. 70, 503–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mathias, M.L., Ramalhinho, M.G. 1999. Insectívores e Roedores. In: Santos-Reis, M., Correia, A.I. (Eds.), Caracterização Da Flora e Da Fauna Do Montado Da Herdade Da Ribeira Abaixo (Grândola-Baixo Alentejo). CBA, Lisboa, pp. 241–248.Google Scholar
  28. Mathias, M.L., Klunderb, M., Santos, S.M. 2003. Metabolism and thermoregulation in the Cabrera vole (Rodentia: Microtus cabrerae). Comp. Biochem. Physiol., Part A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 136, 441–446.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Monamy, V., Fox, B.J. 2000. Small mammal succession is determined by vegetation density rather than time elapsed since disturbance. Aust. Ecol. 25, 580–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mauritzen, M., Bergers, P.J.M., Andreassen, H.B., Barendse, R. 1999. Root vole movement patterns: do ditches function as habitat corridors? J. Appl. Ecol. 36, 409–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Natividade, J.V. 1950. Subericultura. Lisboa: Ministério da Agricultura, Pescas e Alimentação.Google Scholar
  32. Palomo, L.J., Gisbert, J. 2002. Atlas De Los Mamíferos Terrestres De España. Madrid: Direction General de Conservation de la Naturaleza-SECEM-SECEMU.Google Scholar
  33. Pita, R., Mira, A., Beja, P. 2006. Conserving the cabrera vole, microtus cabrerae, in intensively used mediterranean landscapes. Agric. Ecosystems Environ. 115, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pusenius, J., Ostfeld, R.S. 2002. Mammalian predator scent, vegetation cover and tree seedling predation by meadow voles. Ecography 25, 481–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. R Development Core Team 2008. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
  36. Rivas-Martínez, S., Arregui, J.L. 1999. Bioclimatology of the iberian peninsula. Itenera Geobot. 13, 41–47.Google Scholar
  37. Rivas-Martínez, S., Díaz, T.E., Fernández-González, F., Izco, J., Loidi, J., Lousã, M., Penas, À. 2002a. Vascular plant communities of Spain and Portugal (addenda to the syntaxonomical checklist of 2001, Part I. Itenera Geobot. 15, 5–432.Google Scholar
  38. Rivas-Martínez, S., Díaz, T.E., Fernández-González, F., Izco, J., Loidi, J., Lousã, M., Penas, À. 2002b. Vascular plant communities of Spain and Portugal (addenda to the syntaxonomical checklist of 2001, Part II. Itenera Geobot. 15, 433–922.Google Scholar
  39. Rothstein, B.E., Tamarin, R.H. 1977. Feeding behavior of the insular beach vole, Microtus breweri. J. Mammol. 58, 84–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Santos, S.M., Rosário, I.T., Mathias, M.L. 2005. Microhabitat preference of the cabrera vole in a Mediterranean cork oak woodland of southern Portugal. Vie et Milieu 55, 53–59.Google Scholar
  41. Santos, S.M., Klunder, M., Mathias, M.L. 2004. Food consumption and energy assimilation in the Cabrera vole Microtus cabrerae (rodentia). Vie et Milieu 54, 27–30.Google Scholar
  42. Santos, S.M., Mathias, M.L., Mira, A., Simões, M.P. 2007. Vegetation structure and composition of road verge and meadow sites colonized by Cabrera vole (Microtus cabrerae Thomas). Pol. J. Ecol.Google Scholar
  43. Santos, S.M., Simoes, M.P., Mathias, M.L., Mira, A. 2006. Vegetation analysis in colonies of an endangered rodent, the Cabrera vole (Microtus cabrerae), in southern Portugal. Ecol. Res. 21, 197–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Santos-Reis, M., Correia, A.I. 1999. Caracterização Da Flora e Fauna Do Montado Da Herdade Da Ribeira Abaixo. CBA, Lisboa.Google Scholar
  45. Soriguer, R.C., Amat, J.A. 1988. Feeding of Cabrera vole in West-central Spain. Acta Theriol. 33, 586–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Villalba, J.J., Provenza, F.D., Bryant, J.P. 2002. Consequences of the interaction between nutrients and plant secondary metabolites on herbivore selectivity: benefits or detriments for plants? Oikos 97, 282–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Deutsche Gesellschaft für Säugetierkunde 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Inês T. Rosário
    • 1
    Email author
  • Paulo E. Cardoso
    • 2
  • Maria da Luz Mathias
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculdade de Ciências de LisboaCentro de Biologia Ambiental and Departamento de Biologia AnimalLisboaPortugal
  2. 2.Bio3Estudos e Projectos em Biologia e Valorização de Recursos NaturaisLda. Charneca de CaparicaPortugal

Personalised recommendations