Advertisement

Mammalian Biology

, Volume 74, Issue 1, pp 49–58 | Cite as

Identification of semi-domesticated reindeer (Rangifer tarandus tarandus, Linnaeus 1758) and wild forest reindeer (R.t. fennicus, Lönnberg 1909) from postcranial skeletal measurements

  • Anna-Kaisa PuputtiEmail author
  • Markku Niskanen
Original Investigation

Abstract

Reindeer bones are common finds from archaeological sites from prehistoric and historic Fennoscandia. The interpretation of the reindeer bone finds, however, is often hindered by the difficulty to separate the different subspecies of reindeer using the postcranial skeletal morphology. In this paper, skeletal measurements of modern semi-domesticated reindeer and wild forest reindeer are explored with multivariate statistical methods in order to find suitable methods for subspecies identification. The results are then applied to archaeological reindeer bone finds from Northern Finland and archaeological implications of the results are discussed.

Keywords

Rangifer tarandus Zooarchaeology Identification Finland 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aaris-Sørensen, K., Mühldorff, R., Brinch Petersen, E. 2007. The Scandinavian reindeer (Rangifer tarandus L.) after the last glacial maximum: time, seasonality and human exploitation. J. Archaeol. Sci. 34, 914–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnqvist, G., Mårtenson, T. 1998. Measurement error in geometric morphometrics: empirical strategies to assess and reduce its impact on measures of shape. Acta Zoolog. Acad. Sci. Hungar. 44 (1), 73–96.Google Scholar
  3. Banfield, A.W.F. 1961. A Revision of the Reindeer and Cariboü, Genus Rangifer. National Museum of Canada Bulletin 177.Google Scholar
  4. Baxter, M.J. 1994. Exploratory Multivariate Analysis in Archaeology. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  5. Berteaux, D., Guintard, C. 1995. Osteometric study of the metapodials of Amsterdam Island feral cattle. Acta Theriol. 40 (1), 97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cardoso, H.F.V. 2008. Sample-specific (universal) metric approaches for determining the sex of immature human skeletal remains using permanent tooth dimensions. J. Archaeol. Sci. 35, 158–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. DeGusta, D., Vrba, E. 2003. A method for inferring paleohabitats from the functional morphology of bovid astragali. J. Archaeol. Sci. 30, 1009–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Goldberg, P.M. 1999. Statistical comparisons of the osteology of Southwestern Columbidae. J. Archaeol. Sci. 26, 1459–1471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hakala, A.V.K., Heikura, K., Markovsky, V.A., Bljudnik, L., Pulliainen, E., Danilov, P.I. 1996. On the taxonomy and geographical variation of the European reindeer with special reference to the wild forest reindeer, Rangifer tarandus fennicus Lönnberg 1909. Aquilo Ser. Zool. 29, 3–23.Google Scholar
  10. Halinen, P. 2005. Prehistoric Hunters of Northernmost Lapland. Settlement Patterns and Subsistence Strategies. The Finnish Antiquarian Society, Helsinki.Google Scholar
  11. Hufthammer, A.K. 1995. Age determination of reindeer (Rangifer tarandus L.). Archaeozoologia 7 (2), 33–42.Google Scholar
  12. Ingold, T. 1980. Hunters, Pastoralists and Ranchers. Reindeer Economies and Their Transformations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  13. Jungers, W.L., Falsetti, A.B., Wall, C.E. 1995. Shape, relative size and size-adjustments in morphometrics. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, vol. 38, pp. 137–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Klecka, W.R. 1980. Discriminant Analysis. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lahti, E. 2006. Bones from Sáipmi: reconstruction of the everyday life of two ancient Saami households. In: Herva, V. (Ed.), People, Material Culture and Environment in the North. Proceedings of the 22nd Nordic Archaeological Conference, University of Oulu, Oulu, pp. 284–295.Google Scholar
  16. Manly, B.F.Y. 1994. Multivariate Statistical Methods. A Primer, second ed. Chapman & Hall, London.Google Scholar
  17. Mantyla, I. 1971. Tornion kaupungin historia. 1. osa. 1621–1809. Tornion kaupunki, Tornio.Google Scholar
  18. Menard, S. 1995. Applied Logistic Regression Analysis. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.Google Scholar
  19. Nieminen, M., Helle, T. 1980. Variation in body measurements of wild and semi-domestic reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) in Fennoscandia. Ann. Zool. Fennici 17, 275–283.Google Scholar
  20. Puputti, A. 2006. Animal Husbandry and Game Exploitation in 17th Century Tornio, Northern Finland, META 1/2006, pp. 13–28.Google Scholar
  21. Puputti, A. 2007. Ruuanjatteita tunkiolla. Oulun Pikisaaren kesä n 2006 kaivausten eläinluulöydöt. Faravid 31, 9–22.Google Scholar
  22. Puputti, A., Niskanen, M. The estimation of body weight of the reindeer (Rangifer tarandus L.) from skeletal measurements. Environ. Archaeol., in press.Google Scholar
  23. Virrankoski, P. 1973. Pohjois-Pohjanmaan ja Lapin historia III. 1600-luku. Pohjois-Pohjanmaan, Kainuun ja Lapin yhteinen historiatoimikunta, Oulu.Google Scholar
  24. von den Driesch, A. 1976. Das Vermessen von Tierknochen aus Vor- und Frühgeschichtlichen Siedlungen. Univeristat München, München.Google Scholar
  25. Weinstock, J. 2000. Osteometry as a source of refined demographic information: sex ratios or reindeer, hunting strategies, and herd control in the Late Glacial site of Stellmoor, Northern Germany. J. Archaeol. Sci. 27, 1187–1195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Deutsche Gesellschaft für Säugetierkunde 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of ArchaeologyUniversity of OuluOulun yliopistoFinland

Personalised recommendations