Download PDF

Theoretical investigations of the dissociation of charged protein complexes in the gas phase

Articles
First Online:
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:

Abstract

A series of calculations, varying from simple electrostatic to more detailed semi-empirical based molecular dynamics ones, were carried out on charged gas phase ions of the cytochrome c′ dimer. The energetics of differing charge states, charge partitionings, and charge configurations were examined in both the low and high charge regimes. As well, preliminary free energy calculations of dissociation barriers are presented. It is shown that one must always consider distributions of charge configurations, once protein relaxation effects are taken into account, and that no single configuration dominates. All these results also indicate that in the high charge limit, the dissociation of protein complex ions is governed by electrostatic repulsion from the net charges, the consequences of which are enumerated and discussed. There are two main trends deriving from this, namely that charges will move so as to approximately maintain constant surface charge density, and that the lowest barrier to dissociation is the one that produces fragment ions with equal charges. In particular, it is shown that the charge-to-mass ratio of a fragment ion is not the key physical parameter in predicting dissociation products. In fact, from the perspective of the division of total charge, many dissociation pathways reported to be “asymmetric” in the literature should be more properly labelled as “symmetric” or “near-symmetric”. The Coulomb repulsion model assumes that the timescale for charge transfer is faster than that for protein structural changes, which in turn is faster than that for complex dissociation.

Keywords

Basic Site Shiga Toxin Dissociation Channel Potential Ener Lectrospray Ionization 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Download to read the full article text

References

  1. 1.
    Veenstra, T. D. Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry in the Study of Biomolecular Noncovalent Interactions. Biophys. Chem. 1999, 79, 63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kebarle, P. A. Brief Overview of the Present Status of the Mechanisms involved in Electrospray Mass Spectrometry. J. Mass Spectrom. 2000, 35, 804–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cole, R. B. Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry. Wiley: New York, 1997Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Smith, R. D.; Loo, J. A.; Loo, R. R. O.; Busman, M.; Udseth, H. R. Principles and Practice of Electrosparay Ionization-Mass Spectrometry for Large Polypeptides and Proteins. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 1991, 10, 359–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jurchen, J. C.; Garcia, D. E.; Williams, E. R. Gas-Phase Dissociation Pathways of Multiply Charged Peptide Clusters. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2003, 14, 1373–1386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jurchen, J. C.; Williams, E. R. Origin of Asymmetric Charge partitioning in the Dissociation of Gas-Phase Protein Homodimers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 2817–2826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Versluis, C.; van der Staaij, A.; Stokvis, E.; Heck, A. J. R.; Craene, B. Metastable Ion Formation and Disparate Charge Separation in the Gas-Phase Dissection of Protein Assemblies Studied by Orthogonal Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2001, 12, 329–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jones, C. M.; Beardsley, R. L.; Galhena, A. S.; Dagan, S.; Cheng, G.; Wysocki, V. H. Symmetrical Gas-Phase Dissociation of Noncovalent Protein Complexes via Surface Collisions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 15044–15045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Versluis, C.; Heck, A. J. R. Gas-Phase Dissociation of Hemoglobin. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 2001, 210/211, 637–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schwartz, B. L.; Bruce, J. E.; Anderson, G. A.; Hofstadler, S. A.; Rockwood, A. L.; Smith, R. D.; Chilkoti, A.; Stayton, P. S. Dissociation of Tetrameric Ions of Noncovalent Streptavidin Complexes Formed by Electrospray Ionization. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1995, 6, 459–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Iavarone, A. T.; Williams, E. R. Collisionally Activated Dissociation of Supercharged Proteins Formed by Electrospray Ionization. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 4525–4533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jurchen, J. C.; Garcia, D. E.; Williams, E. R. Further Studies on the Origins of Asymmetric Charge Partitioning in Protein Homodimers. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2004, 15, 1408–1415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sinelnikov, I.; Kitova, E. N.; Klassen, J. S.; Armstrong, G. D. Effects of Single Amino Acid Substitution on the Dissociation of Multiply Charged Multiprotein Complexes in the Gas Phase. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2007, 18, 688–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Felitsyn, N.; Kitova, E. N.; Klassen, J. S. Thermal Decomposition of a Gaseous Multiprotein Complex Studied by Blackbody Infrared Radiative Dissociation: Investigating the Origin of the Asymmetric Dissociation Behavior. Anal. Chem. 2001, 73, 4647–4661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sinelnikov, I.; Kitova, E. N.; Klassen, J. S. Influence of Coulombic Repulsion on the Dissociation Pathways and Energetics of Multiprotein Complexes in the Gas Phase. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2007, 18, 617–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Felitsyn, N.; Kitova, E. N.; Klassen, J. S. Thermal Dissociation of the Protein Homodimer Ecotin in the Gas Phase. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2002, 13, 1432–1442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Benesch, J. L. P.; Aquilina, J. A.; Ruotolo, B. T.; Sobott, F.; Robinson, C. V. Tandem Mass Spectrometry Reveals the Quaternary Organization of Macromolecular Assemblies. Chem. Biol. 2006, 13, 597–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sobott, F.; McCammon, M. G.; Robinson, C. V. Gas-Phase Dissociation Pathways of a Tetrameric Protein Complex. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 2003, 230, 193–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Benesch, J. L. P.; Sobott, F.; Robinson, C. V. Thermal Dissociation of Multimeric Protein Complexes by Using Nanoelectrospray Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 2208–2214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chowdhury, S. K.; Katta, V.; Chait, B. T. Probing Conformational Changes in Proteins by Mass Spectrometry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 9012–9013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ryce, S. A.; Wyman, R. R. Two Sphere for the Asymmetric Division of Electrically Charged Liquid Drops. Can. J. Phys. 1970, 112, 2571–2576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Csiszar, S.; Thachuk, M. Using Ellipsoids to Model Charge Distributions in Gas Phase Protein Complex Ion Dissociation. Can. J. Chem. 2004, 82, 1736–1744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Allen, M. P.; Tildesley, D. J. Computer Simulation of Liquids. Clarendon Press: New York, NY, 1989.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Haile, J. M. Molecular Dynamics Simulation: Elementary Methods. John Wiley and Sons Inc: New York, 1992.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wan, W.; Donini, O.; Reyes, C. M.; Kollman, P. A. Biomolecular Simulations: Recent Developments in Force Fields, Simulations of Enzyme Catalysis, Protein-Ligand, Protein-Protein, and Protein-Nucleic Acid Noncovalent Interactions. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 2001, 30, 211–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ren, Z.; Meyer, T.; McRee, D. E. PDB ID:1bbh: Atomic Structure of a Cytochrome c′ with an Unusual Ligand-Controlled Dimer Dissociation at 1.8 A Resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 1993, 234, 433–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Covey, T. R.; Bonner, R. F.; Shushan, B. I.; Henion, J.; Boyd, R. K. The Determination of Protein, Oligonucleotide and Peptide Molecular Weights by Ion-Spray Mass Spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 1988, 2, 249–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Miteva, M.; Demirev, P. A.; Karshikoff, A. D. Multiply-Protonated Protein Ions in the Gas Phase: Calculation of the Electrostatic Interactions between Charge Sites. J. Phys. Chem. B. 1997, 101, 9645–9650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Schnier, P. D.; Gross, D. S.; Williams, E. R. On the Maximum Charge State and Proton Transfer Reactivity of Peptide and Protein Ions Formed By Electrospray Ionization. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1995, 6, 1086–1097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Montgomery, J. A. Jr.; Vreven, T.; Kudin, K. N.; Burant, J. C.; Millam, J. M.; Iyengar, S. S.; Tomasi, J.; Barone, V.; Mennucci, B.; Cossi, M.; Scalmani, G.; Rega, N.; Petersson, G. A.; Nakatsuji, H.; Hada, M.; Ehara, M.; Toyota, K.; Fukuda, R.; Hasegawa, J.; Ishida, M.; Nakajima, T.; Honda, Y.; Kitao, O.; Nakai, H.; Klene, M.; Li, X.; Knox, J. E.; Hratchian, H. P.; Cross, J. B.; Bakken, V.; Adamo, C.; Jaramillo, J.; Gomperts, R.; Stratmann, R. E.; Yazyev, O.; Austin, A. J.; Cammi, R.; Pomelli, C.; Ochterski, J. W.; Ayala, P. Y.; Morokuma, K.; Voth, G. A.; Salvador, P.; Dannenberg, J. J.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Dapprich, S.; Daniels, A. D.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Malick, D. K.; Rabuck, A. D.; Raghavachari, K.; Foresman, J. B.; Ortiz, J. V.; Cui, Q.; Baboul, A. G.; Clifford, S.; Cioslowski, J.; Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.; Liashenko, A.; Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith, T.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng, C. Y.; Nanayakkara, A.; Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.; Johnson, B.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Gonzalez, C.; Pople, J. A. Gaussian 03, Revision B.05; Gaussian, Inc: Wallingford CT, 2004.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Harrison, A. G. The Gas-Phase Basicities and Proton Affinities of Amino Acids and Peptides. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 1997, 16, 201–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wu, Z.; Fenselau, C. Proton Affinity of Arginine Measured by the Kinetic Approach. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 1992, 6, 403–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Berendsen, H. J. C.; van der Spoel, D.; van Drunen, R. GROMACS: A Message-Passing Parallel Molecular Dynamics Implementation. Comp. Phys. Commun. 1995, 91, 43–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lindahl, E.; Hess, B.; van der Spoel, D. GROMACS 3.0: A Package for Molecular Simulation and Trajectory Analysis. J. Mol. Mod. 2001, 7, 306–317.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kaminski, G. A.; Friesner, R. A.; Tirado-Rivers, J.; Jorgensen, W. L. Evaluation and Reparametrization of the OPLS-AA Force Field for Proteins via Comparison with Accurate Quantum Chemical Calculations on Peptides. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2001, 105, 6474–6487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gogonea, V.; Shy, J. M. II; Biswas, P. K. Electronic Structure, Ionization Potential, and Electron Affinity of the Enzyme Cofactor (6R)-5,6,7,8-Tetrahydrobiopterin in the Gas Phase, Solution, and Protein Environments. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2006, 110, 22861–22871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Autenrieth, F.; Tajkhorshid, E.; Baudry, J.; Luthey-Schulten, Z. Classical Force Field Parameters for the Heme Prosthetic Group of Cytochrome c. J. Comput. Chem. 2004, 25, 1613–1622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Liu, D. C.; Nocedal, J. On the Limited Memory BFGS Method for Large Scale Optimization. Math. Prog. 1989, 48, 503–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kräutler, V.; Van Gunsteren, W. F.; Hünenberger, P. H. A Fast SHAKE Algorithm to Solve Distance Constraint Equations for Small Molecules in Molecular Dynamics Simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 2001, 22, 501–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Berendsen, H. J. C.; Postma, J. P. M.; Van Gunsteren, W. F.; DiNola, A.; Haak, J. R. Molecular Dynamics with Coupling to an External Bath. J. Chem. Phys. 1984, 81, 3684–3690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Arteca, G. A. Path-Integral Calculation of the Mean Number of Overcrossings in an Entangled Polymer Network. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 550–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Arteca, G. A.; Tapia, O. Structural Transitions in Neutral and Charged Protein in vacuo. J. Mol. Graphics Model 2001, 19, 102–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kaltashov, I. A.; Mohimen, A. Estimates of Protein Surface Areas in Solution by Electrspray Ionization Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2005, 77, 5370–5379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Van den Heuvel, R. H. H.; Van Duijn, E.; Mazon, H.; Synowsky, S. A.; Lorenzen, K.; Versluis, C.; Brouns, S. J. J.; Langridge, D.; Van der Oost, J.; Hoyes, J.; Heck, A. J. R. Improving the Performance of a Quadrupole Time-of-Flight Instrument for Macromolecular Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 7473–7483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kohtani, M.; Jones, T. C.; Sudha, R.; Jarrold, M. F. Proton Transfer-Induced Conformational Changes and Melting in Designed Peptides in the Gas Phase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 7193–7197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Dongré, A. R.; Jones, J. L.; Somogyi, A.; Wysocki, V. H. Influence of Peptide Composition, Gas-Phase Basicity, and Chemical Modification on Fragmentation Efficiency: Evidence for the Mobile Proton Model. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 8365–8374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Wysocki, V. H.; Tsaprailis, G.; Smith, L. L.; Breci, L. A. Mobile and Localized Protons: A Framework for Understanding Peptide Dissociation. J. Mass Spectrom. 2000, 35, 1399–1399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Vaisar, T.; Urban, J. Gas-phase Fragmentation of Protonated Mono-N-Methylated Peptides: Analogy with Solution-Phase Acid-Catalyzed Hydrolysis. J. Mass Spectrom. 1998, 33, 505–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Marinica, D. C.; Grégoire, G.; Desfrançois, C.; Schermann, J. P.; Borgis, D.; Gaigeot, M. P. Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics of Protonated Dialanine and Comparison to Infrared Multiphoton Dissociation Experiments. J. Phys. Chem. A 2006, 110, 8802–8810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Kulhánek, P.; Schalg, E. W.; Koča, J. A Novel Mechanism of Proton Transfer in Protonated Peptides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 13678–13679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Paizs, B.; Csonka, I. P.; Lendvay, G.; Suhai, S. Proton Mobility in Protonated Glycylglycine and N-Formylglycylglycinamide: A Combined Quantum Chemical and RKKM Study. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2001, 15, 637–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Society for Mass Spectrometry 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ChemistryUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations