On the distributions of ion/neutral molecule clusters in electrospray and laser spray—A cluster division model for the electrospray process

Articles

Abstract

The clustering of a medium-sized, involatile, neutral molecule, octyl β-D-glucopyranoside (OG), with Na+, Ca2+, and Yb3+ (Mz+) ions in electrospray (ESI) was investigated using laser spray (LSI). Extensive distributions of [(Mz+)i (OG)a]n+-clusters, extending beyond 50 kDa, were observed. The distributions were highly stable and reproducible and changed only marginally when concentrations of electrolyte or neutral compound were varied by orders of magnitude. Compared with ESI, laser spray yielded superior intensities, particularly of the larger clusters. The cluster distributions demonstrated a range of remarkable features. In particular, the Yb3+/OG cluster distribution was unusual. For example, no clusters with 35–52 or with 110–116 OG molecules were observed. The distribution pattern revealed that the clusters were formed as a result of cluster dissociations, such as [(Yb3+)3(OG) ∼110W]9+→[(Yb3+)2(OG)∼90W]6++[(Yb3+)1(OG) ∼20W]3+, where W represents the water content at the time of dissociation. Based on this study, a cluster division model for electrospray of aqueous solutions of strongly solvated ions is proposed: the Rayleigh droplet disintegration process, which is well-established for the initial stages of electrospray, maintains its general character as it proceeds through a final regime of multiply charged cluster dissociations to the singly and multiply charged ions in mass spectrometry. In the dissociation of multiply charged clusters, the size of each daughter cluster is roughly proportional to the square of the cluster charge. Observed cluster distributions are consistent with a mixture of symmetric and asymmetric cluster dissociations.

References

  1. 1.
    Whitehouse, C. M.; Dreyer, R. N.; Yamashita, M.; Fenn, J. B. Electrospray interface for liquid chromatographs and mass spectrometers. Anal. Chem. 1985, 57, 675–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yamashita, M.; Fenn, J. B. Negative-ion production with the electrospray ion-source. J. Phys. Chem. 1984, 88, 4671–4675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bruins, A. P.; Covey, T. R.; Henion, J. D. Ion spray interface for combined liquid chromatography/atmospheric pressure ionization mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 1987, 59, 2642–2646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rayleigh, L. On the equilibrium of liquid conducting masses charged with electricity. Phil. Mag. 1882, 14, 184–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Smith, J. N.; Flagan, R. C.; Beauchamp, J. L. Droplet evaporation and discharge dynamics in electrospray ionization. J. Phys. Chem. A 2002, 106, 9957–9967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grimm, R. L.; Beauchamp, J. L. Evaporation and discharge dynamics of highly charged droplets of heptane, octane, and p-xylene generated by electrospray ionization. Anal. Chem. 2002, 74, 6291–6297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gomez, A.; Tang, K. Q. Charge and fission of droplets in electrostatic sprays. Phys. Fluids 1994, 6, 404–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kebarle, P.; Tang, L. From ions in solution to ions in the gas-phase—the mechanism of electrospray mass-spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 1993, 65, A972-A986.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kebarle, P. A brief overview of the present status of the mechanisms involved in electrospray mass spectrometry. J. Mass Spectrom. 2000, 35, 804–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cech, N. B.; Enke, C. G. Practical implications of some recent studies in electrospray ionization fundamentals. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 2001, 20, 362–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Enke, C. G. A predictive model for matrix and analyte effects in electrospray ionization of singly-charged ionic analytes. Anal. Chem. 1997, 69, 4885–4893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Iribarne, J. V.; Thomson, B. A. Evaporation of small ions from charged droplets. J. Chem. Phys. 1976, 64, 2287–2294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Thomson, B. A.; Iribarne, J. V. Field-induced ion evaporation from liquid surfaces at atmospheric-pressure. J. Chem. Phys. 1979, 71, 4451–4463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Thomson, B. A.; Iribarne, J. V.; Dziedzic, P. J. Liquid ion evaporation mass-spectrometry mass-spectrometry for the detection of polar and labile molecules. Anal. Chem. 1982, 54, 2219–2224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dole, M.; Mack, L. L.; Hines, R. L.; Mobley, R. C.; Ferguson, L. P.; Alice, M. B. Molecular beams of macro-ions. J. Chem. Phys. 1968, 49, 2240–2249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kebarle, P.; Peschke, M. On the mechanisms by which the charged droplets produced by electrospray lead to gas phase ions. Anal. Chim. Acta 2000, 406, 11–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gamero-Castano, M.; de la Mora, J. F. Kinetics of small ion evaporation from the charge and mass distribution of multiply charged clusters in electrosprays. J. Mass Spectrom. 2000, 35, 790–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    de la Mora, J. F. Electrospray ionization of large multiply charged species proceeds via Dole’s charged residue mechanism. Anal. Chim. Acta 2000, 406, 93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gamero-Castano, M.; de la Mora, J. F. Modulations in the abundance of salt clusters in electrosprays. Anal. Chem. 2000, 72, 1426–1429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gamero-Castano, M.; de la Mora, J. F. Mechanisms of electrospray ionization of singly and multiply charged salt clusters. Anal. Chim. Acta 2000, 406, 67–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gamero-Castano, M.; de la Mora, J. F. Direct measurement of ion evaporation kinetics from electrified liquid surfaces. J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 113, 815–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hiraoka, K. Laser spray: Electric field-assisted matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization. J. Mass Spectrom. 2004, 39, 341–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Takamizawa, A.; Fujimaki, S.; Sunner, J.; Hiraoka, K. Denaturation of lysozyme and myoglobin in laser spray. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2005, 16, 860–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fenn, J. B.; Mann, M.; Meng, C. K.; Wong, S. F.; Whitehouse, C. M. Electrospray ionization for mass spectrometry of large biomolecules. Science 1989, 246, 64–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wong, S. F.; Meng, C. K.; Fenn, J. B. Multiple charging in electrospray ionization of poly(ethylene glycols). J. Phys. Chem. 1988, 92, 546–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fenn, J. B.; Mann, M.; Meng, C. K.; Wong, S. F.; Whitehouse, C. M. Electrospray ionization—principles and practice. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 1990, 9, 37–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Meng, C. K.; Fenn, J. B. Formation of charged clusters during electrospray ionization of organic solute species. Org. Mass Spectrom. 1991, 26, 542–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zook, D. R.; Bruins, A. P. On cluster ions, ion transmission, and linear dynamic range limitations in electrospray (ion spray) mass spectrometry. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Processes 1997, 162, 129–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zhou, S. L.; Hamburger, M. Formation of sodium cluster ions in electrospray mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 1996, 10, 797–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hop, C. E. C. A. Generation of high molecular weight cluster ions by electrospray ionization: Implications for mass calibration. J. Mass Spectrom. 1996, 31, 1314–1316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wang, G. D.; Cole, R. B. Solvation energy and gas-phase stability influences on alkali metal cluster ion formation in electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 1998, 70, 873–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Charles, L.; Pepin, D.; Gonnet, F.; Tabet, F. C. Effects of liquid phase composition on salt cluster formation in positive ion mode electrospray mass spectrometry: Implications for clustering mechanism in electrospray. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2001, 12, 1077–1084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hao, C. Y.; March, R. E. Electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometric study of salt cluster ions. Part 2. Salts of polyatomic acid groups and of multivalent metals. J. Mass Spectrom. 2001, 36, 509–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hao, C. Y.; March, R. E.; Croley, T. R.; Smith, J. C.; Rafferty, S. P. Electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometric study of salt cluster ions: Part 1. Investigations of alkali metal chloride and sodium salt cluster ions. J. Mass Spectrom. 2001, 36, 79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Siuzdak, G.; Bothner, B. Gas-phase micelles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1995, 34, 2053–2055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Nohara, D.; Ohkoshi, T.; Sakai, T. The possibility of the direct measurement of micelle weight by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 1998, 12, 1933–1935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Nohara, D.; Bitoh, M. Observation of micelle solution of decyltrimethylammonium bromide by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. J. Mass Spectrom. 2000, 35, 1434–1437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Cacace, F.; de Petris, G.; Giglio, E.; Punzo, F.; Troiani, A. Bile salt aggregates in the gas phase: An electrospray ionization mass spectrometric study. Chem. A Eur. J. 2002, 8, 1925–1933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Rodriguez, M. A.; Yost, R. A. Interpretation of electrospray/ion trap mass spectra of bile acids and other surfactants. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2000, 14, 1398–1403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Nohara, D.; Kajiura, T.; Takeda, K. Determination of micelle mass by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. J. Mass Spectrom. 2005, 40, 489–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Schalley, C. A. Supramolecular chemistry goes gas phase: The mass spectrometric examination of noncovalent interactions in host-guest chemistry and molecular recognition. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 2000, 194, 11–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Dreisewerd, K. The desorption process in MALDI. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 395–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Karas, M.; Kruger, R. Ion formation in MALDI: The cluster ionization mechanism. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 427–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Sunner, J.; Morales, A.; Kebarle, P. Kinetic modeling of fast atom bombardment spectra of glycerol. Anal. Chem. 1988, 60, 98–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Sunner, J.; Ikonomou, M. G.; Kebarle, P. SIMS spectra of alcohols and the phase explosion model of desorption ionization. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Processes 1988, 82, 221–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Society for Mass Spectrometry 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemistry and BiochemistryMontana State UniversityBozemanUSA
  2. 2.School of Pharmacy and Biomedical SciencesUniversity of PortsmouthPortsmouthUK
  3. 3.Clean Energy Research CenterUniversity of YamanashiKofuJapan

Personalised recommendations