Download PDF

A preconcentrator coupled to a GC/FTMS: Advantages of self-chemical ionization, mass measurement accuracy, and high mass resolving power for GC applications

  • Touradj Solouki
  • Jan E. Szulejko
  • Justin B. Bennett
  • LeRae B. Graham
Articles
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:

Abstract

Coupling of a cryogenic preconcentrator (PC) to a gas chromatograph/Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometer (GC/FT-ICR MS) is reported. To demonstrate the analytical capabilities of the PC/GC/FT-ICR MS, headspace samples containing volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emitted from detached pine tree twigs were analyzed. Sub-ppm mass measurement accuracy (MMA) for highly resolved (m/Δm50%>150 k) terpene ions was achieved. Direct PC/GC/FT-ICR MS analyses revealed that detached twigs from pine trees emit acetone, camphor, and four detectable hydrocarbon isomers with C10H16 empirical formula. The unknown analytes were identified based on accurate mass measurement and their mass spectral appearances. Authentic samples were used to confirm initially unknown identifications. Self-chemical-ionization (SCI) reactions furnished an additional dimension for rapid isomer differentiation of GC eluents in real time.

Keywords

Terpene Camphene Monoterpene Proton Affinity High Resolution Mass Spectrum 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Download to read the full article text

References

  1. 1.
    Robinson, A. EHC 155: Biomarkers and Risk Assessment: Concepts and Principles; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 1993, pp 1–82.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Smith, D.; Španel, P.; Davies, S. Trace Gas in Breath of Healthy Volunteers when Fasting and After a Protein-Calorie Meal: A Preliminary Study. J. Appl. Physiol. 1999, 87, 1584–1588.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yu, K.; Hamilton-Kemp, T. R.; Archbold, D. D.; Collins, R. W.; Newman, M. C. Volatile Compounds from Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Their Absorption by Strawberry Fruit. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 413–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Demirev, P. A.; Lin, J. S.; Pineda, F. J.; Fenselau, C. Bioinformatics and Mass Spectrometry for Microorganism Identification: Proteome-Wide Post-Translational Modifications and Database Search Algorithms for Characterization of Intact. H. Pylori. Anal. Chem. 2001, 73, 4566–4573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lee, M. L.; Smith, D. L.; Freeman, L. R. High-Resolution Gas Chromatographic Profiles of Volatile Organic Compounds Produced by Microorganisms at Refrigerated Temperatures. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1979, 37, 85–90.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Takayasu, T.; Ohshima, T.; Kondo, T.; Sato, Y. Intratracheal Gas Analysis for Volatile Substances by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry Application to Forensic Autopsies. J. Forensic Sci. 2001, 46, 98–104.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fievre, A.; Solouki, T.; Marshall, A. G.; Cooper, W. T. High-Resolution Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance Mass Spectrometry of Humic and Fulvic Acids by Laser Desorption/Ionization and Electrospray Ionization. Ener. Fuels 1997, 11, 554–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rodgers, R. P.; White, F. M.; Hendrickson, C. L.; Marshall, A. G.; Andersen, K. V. Resolution, Elemental Composition, and Simultaneous Monitoring by Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance Mass Spectrometry of Organosulfur Species Before and After Diesel Fuel Processing. Anal. Chem. 1998, 70, 4743–4750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Craig, A. G.; Speir, J. P.; Rosamilia, S.; Fursey, V.; Lirazan, M. B. [M+Fe — 5H]2− Peptide Ion Composition Verified by Fourier Transform Mass Spectrometry Accurate Mass and Tandem Mass Spectrometry Analyses. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2000, 11, 83–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Beynon, J. H. Qualitative Analysis of Organic Compounds by Mass Spectrometry. Nature 1954, 174, 735–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Szulejko, J. E.; Solouki, T. Potential Analytical Applications of Interfacing a GC to an FT-ICR MS: Fingerprinting Complex Sample Matrixes. Anal. Chem. 2002, 74, 3434–3442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    McFadden, W. Techniques of Combined Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry; Wiley: New York, 1973, pp 1–482.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Masselon, C.; Tolmachev, A. V.; Anderson, G. A.; Harkewicz, R.; Smith, R. D. Mass Measurement Errors Caused by Local Frequency Perturbations in FTICR Mass Spectrometry. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2002, 13, 99–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Burton, R. D.; Matuszak, K. P.; Watson, C. H.; Eyler, J. R. Exact Mass Measurement Using a 7 Tesla Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance Mass Spectrometer in a Good Laboratory Practices-Regulated Environment. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1999, 10, 1291–1297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hughey, C. A.; Hendrickson, C. L.; Rodgers, R. P.; Marshall, A. G.; Qian, K. Kenrdrick Mass Defect Spectrum: A Compact Visual Analysis for Ultrahigh-Resolution Broadband Mass Spectra. Anal. Chem. 2001, 73, 4676–4681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    He, F.; Hendrickson, C. L.; Marshall, A. G. Baseline Mass Resolution of Peptide Isobars: A Record for Molecular Mass Resolution. Anal. Chem. 2001, 73, 647–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ragunathan, N.; Krock, K. A.; Klawun, C.; Sasaki, T. A.; Wilkins, C. L. Gas Chromatography with Spectroscopic Detectors. J. Chromatogr. A 1999, 856, 349–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Harris, C. M. Waiting to Exhale: Meeting News from the Federation of Analytical Chemistry and Spectroscopy Societies (FACSS) Meeting PC/GC/FT-ICR MS for Exhaled Breath Analysis by Touradj Solouki, Jan Szulejko. Anal. Chem. 2001, 73, 658A-659A.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ochiai, N.; Takino, M.; Daishima, S.; Cardin, D. B. Analysis of Volatile Sulphur Compounds in Breath by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Using a Three-Stage Cryogenic Trapping Preconcentration System. J. Chromatogr. B 2001, 762, 67–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jacoby, C. B.; Remple, D. L.; Gross, M. L. A Cold Trap/Pulsed Valve GC/FTMS Interface: Ultra-Trace Analysis. Proceeding of the 38th ASMS Conference on Mass Spectrometry and Allied Topics; Tucson, AZ, 1990, pp 840–841.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yatagai, M.; Sato, T. Terpenes of Leaf Oils from Conifers. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 1986, 14, 469–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Roussis, V.; Petrakis, P. V.; Ortiz, A.; Mazomenos, B. E. Volatile Constituents of Needles of Five Pinus Species Grown in Greece. Phytochem. 1995, 39, 357–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hanover, J. W. Environmental Variation in the Monoterpenes of. Pinus monticola Dougl. Phytochem. 1966, 1966, 713–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wilkinson, R. C.; Hanover, J. W. Geographical Variation in the Monoterpene Composition of Red Spruce. Phytochem. 1972, 11, 2007–2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jüttner, F. Changes of Monoterpene Concentration in Needles of Pollution-Injured Picea abies Exhibiting Montane Yellowing. Physiol. Plant 1988, 72, 48–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schulten, H. R.; Simmleit, N.; Rump, H. H. Forest Damage: Characterization of Spruce Needles by Pyrolysis Field Ionization Mass Spectrometry. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 1986, 27, 241–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Paré, P. W.; Tumlinson, J. H. Plant Volatile Signals in Response to Herbivore Feeding. Florida Entomol. 1996, 79, 93–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Winer, A. M.; Atkinson, R.; James, N.; Pitts, J. Gaseous Nitrate Radical: Possible Nighttime Atmospheric Sink for Biogenic Organic Compounds. Science 1984, 224, 156–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rudloff, E. V. Seasonal Variation in the Composition of the Volatile Oil of the Leaves, Buds, and Twigs of White Spruce (Picea glauca). Can. J. Bot. 1972, 50, 1595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Muzika, R. M.; Campbell, C. L.; Hanover, J. W.; Smith, A. L. Comparison of Techniques for Extracting Volatile Compounds from Conifer Needles. J. Chem. Ecol. 1990, 16, 2713–2723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Dormont, L.; Roques, A.; Malosse, C. Cone and Foliage Volatiles Emitted by Pinus cembra and Some Related Conifer Species. Phytochem. 1998, 49, 1269–1277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kim, J.-C. Factors Controlling Natural VOC Emissions in a Southeastern U.S. Pine Forest. Atmosph. Environ. 2001, 35, 3279–3292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Williams, E. R.; McLafferty, F. W. One Hundred Ninety Three-nm Laser Photoionization and Photodissociation for Isomer Differentiation in Fourier-Transform Mass Spectrometry. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1990, 1, 361–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sack, T. M.; McCrery, D. A.; Gross, M. L. Gas Chromatography/Multiphoton Ionization Fourier Transform Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 1985, 57, 1290–1295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Büker, H.-H.; Grützmacher, H.-F.; Crestoni, M. E.; Ricci, A. Proton Induced Methyl Group Shifts in Gaseous Xylenium Ions. Distinguishing Isomers by Gas-phase Titration. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Processes 1997, 160, 167–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sharifi, M.; Einhorn, J. Isomeric Differentiation of Conjugated Diene Epoxides by Polar [4+ 2+] Diels-Alder Cycloaddition of Acylium Ions in an Ion Trap Mass Spectrometer. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 1999, 190/191, 253–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Dolnikowski, G. G.; Gross, M. L. Isomer Differentiation in 7,12-Dimethylbenz[α]anthracene-Pyridine Adducts by Fast Atom Bombardment Tandem Mass Spectrometry. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1991, 2, 256–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Tao, W. A.; Wu, L.; Cooks, R. G. Differentiation and Quantitation of Isomeric Dipeptides by Low-energy Dissociation of Copper(II)-bound Complexes. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2001, 12, 490–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Waridel, P.; Wolfender, J.-L.; Ndjoko, K.; Hobby, K. R.; Major, H. J.; Hostettmann, K. Evaluation of Quadrupole Time-of-Flight Tandem Mass Spectrometry and Ion-trap Multiple-Stage Mass Spectrometry for the Differentiation of C-Glycosidic Flavonoid Isomers. J. Chromatogr. A 2001, 926, 29–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mosi, A. A.; Cullen, W. R.; Eigendorf, G. K. Ion/Molecule Reactions of Perfluorotributylamine (FC43) Cations with Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in a Quadrupole Ion Trap. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 1999, 190/191, 195–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Miles, W. F.; Gurprasad, N. P.; Malis, G. P. Isomer-Specific Determination of Hexacholrodibenzo-p-Dioxins by Oxygen Negative Chemical Ionization Mass Spectrometry, Gas Chromatography, and High-Pressure Liquid Chromatography. Anal. Chem. 1985, 57, 1133–1138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Crespín, M. A.; Cárdenas, S.; Gallego, M.; Valcárcel, M. Discrimination of Structural Isomers of Chlorinated Phenols in Waters Using Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry in the Negative Chemical Ionization Mode. J. Chromatogr. A 1999, 830, 165–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hayakawa, S.; Taguchi, K.; Kotani, R.; Arakawa, K.; Morishita, N. Discrimination of Isomers of Dichlorobenzene Using Charge Inversion Mass Spectrometry. J. Mass Spectrom. Soc. Japan 2001, 49(219), 223.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Bulpitt, C.; Tsang, S. C. Detection and Differentiation of C4 Hydrocarbon Isomers Over the Pd-SnO2 Compressed Powder Sensor. Sensors and Actuators. B: Chemical. 2000, 69, 100–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Gordon, A. G. The Taxonomy and Genetics of Picea rubens and Its Relationship to Picea mariana. Can. J. Bot. 1976, 54, 781–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Brooks, J. E.; Pierce, H. D.; Borden, J. H.; Lister, G. R. Seasonal Variation in Foliar and Bud Monoterpenes in Sitka Spruce. Can. J. Bot. 1987, 65, 1249–1252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Sack, T. M.; Gross, M. L. Pulsed Valve Interface for Gas Chromatography/Fourier Transform Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 1983, 55, 2419–2421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Solouki, T.; Fort, R.; Alomary, A.; Fattahi, A. Gas-Phase Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange Reactions of a Model Peptide: FT-ICR and Computional Analyses of Metal Induced Conformational Mutations. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2001, 12, 1272–1285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Dudley, B. Perfumery Chemicals from Pinene. Chem. Ind. 1964, 2, 263–267.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Janson, R.; deServes, C. Acetone and Monoterpene Emissions from the Boreal Forest in Northern Europe. Atmosph. Environ. 2001, 35, 4629–4637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Goldstein, A. H.; Schade, G. W. Quantifying Biogenic and Anthropogenic Contributions to Acetone Mixing Ratios in a Rural Environment. Atmosph. Environ. 2000, 34, 4997–5006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Lide, D. R.; Frederikse, H. P. R. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 77th ed. CRC Press Inc.: Baton Rouge, LA, 1996/1997 Sections 6–112.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Szulejko, J. E.; Bennett, J. B.; Graham, L. B.; Solouki, T. Kinetic Analysis of Metastable Decay and Ion-Molecule Reactions for Selected Terpene Isomers: Cold and Hot Ions. Proceedings of the 51st ASMS Conference on Mass Spectrometry and Allied Topics; Montreal, QC, Canada, 2003; p 2138.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Szulejko, J. E., Solouki, T. Self-Chemical Ionization of Camphene and α-Pinene Isomers. Ionic Excited States, Acidities, Neutral Proton Affinities and Other Thermochemical Considerations, unpublished.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Bennett, J. B.; Graham, L. B.; Szulejko, J. E.; Solouki, T. Differentiation of Terpene Isomers Based on Unimolecular and Ion-Neutral Reactions. Proceedings of the 4th North American FT-ICR MS Conference; Marshall, CA, April, 2003.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Ebmeyer, F. Theoretical Investigations Towards an Understanding of the α-Pinene/Camphene Rearrangement. J. Molec. Struct. (Theochem.) 2002, 582, 251–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Society for Mass Spectrometry 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Touradj Solouki
    • 1
  • Jan E. Szulejko
    • 1
  • Justin B. Bennett
    • 1
  • LeRae B. Graham
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ChemistryUniversity of MaineOronoUSA

Personalised recommendations