Bulletin of Mathematical Biology

, Volume 66, Issue 6, pp 1731–1753 | Cite as

Resource allocation, hyperphagia and compensatory growth

  • William S. C. GurneyEmail author
  • Roger M. Nisbet


Organisms often shown enhanced growth during recovery from starvation, and can even overtake continuously fed conspecifics (overcompensation). In an earlier paper (Ecology 84, 2777–2787), we studied the relative role played by hyperphagia and resource allocation in producing overcompensation in juvenile (non-reproductive) animals. We found that, although hyperphagia always produces growth compensation, overcompensation additionally requires protein allocation control which routes assimilate preferentially to structure during recovery. In this paper we extend our model to cover reproductively active individuals and demonstrate that growth rate overcompensation requires a similar combination of hyperphagia and allocation control which routes the part of enhanced assimilation not used for reproduction preferentially towards structural growth. We compare the properties of our dynamic energy budget model with an earlier proposal, due to Kooijman, which we extend to include hyperphagia. This formulation assumes that the rate of allocation to reserves is controlled by instantaneous feeding rate, and one would thus expect that an extension to include hyperphagia would not predict growth overcompensation. However, we show that a self-consistent representation of the hyperphagic response in Kooijman’s model overrides its fundamental dynamics, leading to preferential allocation to structural growth during recovery and hence to growth overcompensation.


Assimilation Rate Compensatory Growth Structural Mass Structural Growth Reserve Fraction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Blum, W. F. (1997). Leptin: the voice of the adipose tissue. Hormone Res. 48, 2–8.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bradley, M. C., N. Perrin and P. Calow (1991). Energy allocation in the clodoceran Daphnia magna Strauss under starvation and refeeding. Oecologia 86, 414–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Broekhuisen, N. W., W. S. C. Gurney, A. Jones and A. Bryant (1994). Modelling compensatory growth. Funct. Ecol. 8, 770–782.Google Scholar
  4. Bull, C. D. and N. B. Metcalfe (1996). Regulation of hyperphagia in response to varying energy deficits in over-wintering juvenile Atlantic salmon. J. Fish Biol. 20, 498–510.Google Scholar
  5. Friedman, J. M. (1998). Leptin, leptin receptors and the control of body weight. Nutr. Rev. 56, 38–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fujiwara, M., B. E. Kendal and R. M. Nisbet (2004). Growth autocorrelation and animal size variation. Ecol. Lett. 7, 106–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gurney, W. S. C., W. Jones, A. R. Veitch and R. M. Nisbet (2003). Resource allocation, hyperphagia and compensatory growth in juveniles. Ecology 84, 2777–2787.Google Scholar
  8. Gurney, W. S. C. and R. M. Nisbet (1998). Ecological Dynamics, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Hayward, R. S., D. B. Noltie and N. Wang (1997). Use of compensatory growth to double hybrid sunfish growth rates. Trans. Am. Fisheries Soc. 126, 316–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jobling, M. and S. J. S. Johansen (1999). The lipostat, hyperphagia and catch-up growth. Aquaculture Res. 30, 473–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kennedy, G. C. (1953). The role of depot fat in hypothalmic control of food intake in the rat. Proc. R. Soc. B 140, 578–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kooijman, S. A. L. M. (1993). Dynamic Energy Budgets in Biological Systems, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Kooijman, S. A. L. M. (2000). Dynamic Energy and Mass Budgets in Biological Systems, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Miglavs, I. and M. Jobling (1989a). Effects of feeding regime on food consumption, growth rates and tissue nucleic acid in juvenile Arctic charr, Salvelinus alpinus with particular reference to compensatory growth. J. Fish Biol. 34, 937–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Miglavs, I. and M. Jobling (1989b). The effects of feeding regime on proximate body composition and patterns of energy deposition in juvenile arctic charr, Salvelinus alpinus. J. Fish Biol. 35, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Muller, E. and R. M. Nisbet (2000). Survival and production in variable resource environments. Bull. Math. Biol. 62, 1163–1190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nisbet, R. M., E. B. Muller, K. Like and S. A. L. M. Kooijman (2000). From molecules to ecosystems through dynamic energy budgets. J. Anim. Ecol. 69, 913–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Russell, N. R. and R. J. Wooton (1992). Appetite and growth compensation in the European minnow, Phoxinus phoxinus, following short periods of food restriction. Environ. Biol. Fishes 34, 277–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Weatherly, A. H. and R. W. Gill (1981). Recovery growth following periods of restricted rations and starvation in rainbow trout Salmo gairdneri Richardson. J. Fish Biol. 18, 195–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Weigle, D. S. (1994). Appetite and the regulation of body composition. FASEB J. 8, 302–310.Google Scholar
  21. Wilson, P. N. and D. F. Osbourne (1960). Compensatory growth after under-nutrition in mammals and birds. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 37, 324–363.Google Scholar
  22. Yu, M., F. E. Robinson, M. T. Clandin and L. Bodnar (1990). Growth and body composition of broiler chickens in response to different regimes of feed restriction. Poultry Sci. 69, 2074–2081.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Mathematical Biology 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Statistics and Modelling ScienceUniversity of StrathclydeGlasgowUK
  2. 2.Fisheries Research Services, Marine LaboratoryAberdeenUK
  3. 3.Department of Ecology, Evolution and Marine BiologyUniversity of CaliforniaSanta BarbaraUSA

Personalised recommendations